Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort. / Gramkow, Mathias Holsey; Clemmensen, Frederikke Kragh; Waldemar, Gunhild; Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers; Frederiksen, Kristian Steen.

In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Vol. 456, 122856, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gramkow, MH, Clemmensen, FK, Waldemar, G, Hasselbalch, SG & Frederiksen, KS 2024, 'Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort', Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 456, 122856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2023.122856

APA

Gramkow, M. H., Clemmensen, F. K., Waldemar, G., Hasselbalch, S. G., & Frederiksen, K. S. (2024). Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 456, [122856]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2023.122856

Vancouver

Gramkow MH, Clemmensen FK, Waldemar G, Hasselbalch SG, Frederiksen KS. Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2024;456. 122856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2023.122856

Author

Gramkow, Mathias Holsey ; Clemmensen, Frederikke Kragh ; Waldemar, Gunhild ; Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers ; Frederiksen, Kristian Steen. / Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort. In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2024 ; Vol. 456.

Bibtex

@article{07952f9b17f0421d88622e55e8d82fa5,
title = "Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort",
abstract = "Background: Quantitative light reflex pupillometry (qLRP) may be a promising digital biomarker in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), as neuropathological changes have been found in the midbrain structures governing the light reflex. Studies investigating test-retest reliability and short-term, intra-subject variability of qLRP in these patient groups are missing. Our objective was therefore to investigate the test-retest reliability and short-term, intra-subject variability of qLRP in a memory clinic setting, where patients with neurodegenerative disease are frequently evaluated. Methods: Test-retest reliability study. We recruited patients from a tertiary memory clinic and qLRP was carried out at a baseline visit and then repeated on day 3–14 and on day 21–35 using a hand-held pupillometer. We evaluated the test-retest reliability of qLRP by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and intra-subject, short-term variability by fitting linear mixed models. We compared ICCs for subgroups based on age, sex, disease severity (MCI vs. mild dementia), AD diagnosis, and amount of neurodegeneration (cerebrospinal fluid-total tau levels). Results: In total, 40 patients (mean age 72 years, 15 female, 22 with mild dementia) were included in the study. We found good-excellent reliability (ICC range 0.86–0.93) for most qLRP parameters. qLRP parameters exhibited limited intra-subject variability and we found no large sources of variability when examining subgroups. Conclusion: qLRP was found to have acceptable test-retest reliability and the study results pave the way for research using longitudinal or cross-sectional measurements to assess the construct in identifying and prognosticating neurodegenerative diseases.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Light reflex, Memory clinic, Neurodegeneration, Quantitative pupillometry, Test-retest",
author = "Gramkow, {Mathias Holsey} and Clemmensen, {Frederikke Kragh} and Gunhild Waldemar and Hasselbalch, {Steen Gregers} and Frederiksen, {Kristian Steen}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.jns.2023.122856",
language = "English",
volume = "456",
journal = "Journal of the Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0022-510X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest reliability and short-term variability of quantitative light reflex pupillometry in a mixed memory clinic cohort

AU - Gramkow, Mathias Holsey

AU - Clemmensen, Frederikke Kragh

AU - Waldemar, Gunhild

AU - Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers

AU - Frederiksen, Kristian Steen

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Background: Quantitative light reflex pupillometry (qLRP) may be a promising digital biomarker in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), as neuropathological changes have been found in the midbrain structures governing the light reflex. Studies investigating test-retest reliability and short-term, intra-subject variability of qLRP in these patient groups are missing. Our objective was therefore to investigate the test-retest reliability and short-term, intra-subject variability of qLRP in a memory clinic setting, where patients with neurodegenerative disease are frequently evaluated. Methods: Test-retest reliability study. We recruited patients from a tertiary memory clinic and qLRP was carried out at a baseline visit and then repeated on day 3–14 and on day 21–35 using a hand-held pupillometer. We evaluated the test-retest reliability of qLRP by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and intra-subject, short-term variability by fitting linear mixed models. We compared ICCs for subgroups based on age, sex, disease severity (MCI vs. mild dementia), AD diagnosis, and amount of neurodegeneration (cerebrospinal fluid-total tau levels). Results: In total, 40 patients (mean age 72 years, 15 female, 22 with mild dementia) were included in the study. We found good-excellent reliability (ICC range 0.86–0.93) for most qLRP parameters. qLRP parameters exhibited limited intra-subject variability and we found no large sources of variability when examining subgroups. Conclusion: qLRP was found to have acceptable test-retest reliability and the study results pave the way for research using longitudinal or cross-sectional measurements to assess the construct in identifying and prognosticating neurodegenerative diseases.

AB - Background: Quantitative light reflex pupillometry (qLRP) may be a promising digital biomarker in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), as neuropathological changes have been found in the midbrain structures governing the light reflex. Studies investigating test-retest reliability and short-term, intra-subject variability of qLRP in these patient groups are missing. Our objective was therefore to investigate the test-retest reliability and short-term, intra-subject variability of qLRP in a memory clinic setting, where patients with neurodegenerative disease are frequently evaluated. Methods: Test-retest reliability study. We recruited patients from a tertiary memory clinic and qLRP was carried out at a baseline visit and then repeated on day 3–14 and on day 21–35 using a hand-held pupillometer. We evaluated the test-retest reliability of qLRP by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and intra-subject, short-term variability by fitting linear mixed models. We compared ICCs for subgroups based on age, sex, disease severity (MCI vs. mild dementia), AD diagnosis, and amount of neurodegeneration (cerebrospinal fluid-total tau levels). Results: In total, 40 patients (mean age 72 years, 15 female, 22 with mild dementia) were included in the study. We found good-excellent reliability (ICC range 0.86–0.93) for most qLRP parameters. qLRP parameters exhibited limited intra-subject variability and we found no large sources of variability when examining subgroups. Conclusion: qLRP was found to have acceptable test-retest reliability and the study results pave the way for research using longitudinal or cross-sectional measurements to assess the construct in identifying and prognosticating neurodegenerative diseases.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Light reflex

KW - Memory clinic

KW - Neurodegeneration

KW - Quantitative pupillometry

KW - Test-retest

U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2023.122856

DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2023.122856

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38154247

AN - SCOPUS:85182283538

VL - 456

JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

SN - 0022-510X

M1 - 122856

ER -

ID: 380217302