Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters. / Lillesø, Jens-Peter Barnekow; Harwood, C.; Derero, Abayneh; Graudal, Lars; Roshetko, J.M.; Kindt, R.; Moestrup, Søren; Omondi, W.O.; Holtne, N.; Mbora, A.; van Breugel, Paulo; Dawson, I.K.; Jamnadass, R.; Egelyng, Henrik.

I: Development Policy Review, Bind 36, Nr. Supplement S1, 2018, s. O89-O112.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lillesø, J-PB, Harwood, C, Derero, A, Graudal, L, Roshetko, JM, Kindt, R, Moestrup, S, Omondi, WO, Holtne, N, Mbora, A, van Breugel, P, Dawson, IK, Jamnadass, R & Egelyng, H 2018, 'Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters', Development Policy Review, bind 36, nr. Supplement S1, s. O89-O112. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12233

APA

Lillesø, J-P. B., Harwood, C., Derero, A., Graudal, L., Roshetko, J. M., Kindt, R., Moestrup, S., Omondi, W. O., Holtne, N., Mbora, A., van Breugel, P., Dawson, I. K., Jamnadass, R., & Egelyng, H. (2018). Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters. Development Policy Review, 36(Supplement S1), O89-O112. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12233

Vancouver

Lillesø J-PB, Harwood C, Derero A, Graudal L, Roshetko JM, Kindt R o.a. Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters. Development Policy Review. 2018;36(Supplement S1):O89-O112. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12233

Author

Lillesø, Jens-Peter Barnekow ; Harwood, C. ; Derero, Abayneh ; Graudal, Lars ; Roshetko, J.M. ; Kindt, R. ; Moestrup, Søren ; Omondi, W.O. ; Holtne, N. ; Mbora, A. ; van Breugel, Paulo ; Dawson, I.K. ; Jamnadass, R. ; Egelyng, Henrik. / Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters. I: Development Policy Review. 2018 ; Bind 36, Nr. Supplement S1. s. O89-O112.

Bibtex

@article{fa86741f74eb415d80c20fe6bd7713fc,
title = "Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters",
abstract = "Rethinking the logic of institutional environments aiming to facilitate agroforestry smallholders in economic development, this paper compares smallholder input supply systems for crop and tree seeds in Sub-Saharan Africa and reflects on two basic challenges: (i) how to develop a large number of relevant tree crops for different agroecologies; (ii) how to reach smallholders in rural areas. Policy options for improving agroforestry input supply systems are discussed, whereby our article concludes with suggestions how sectoral approaches for crop seed systems can be modified to agroforestry seed-seedling systems. Biophysical differences have practical implications for how the logic of the {\textquoteleft}African green revolution{\textquoteright} would be translated into a corresponding revolution for agroforestry.",
author = "Lilles{\o}, {Jens-Peter Barnekow} and C. Harwood and Abayneh Derero and Lars Graudal and J.M. Roshetko and R. Kindt and S{\o}ren Moestrup and W.O. Omondi and N. Holtne and A. Mbora and {van Breugel}, Paulo and I.K. Dawson and R. Jamnadass and Henrik Egelyng",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/dpr.12233",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "O89--O112",
journal = "Development Policy Review",
issn = "0950-6764",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "Supplement S1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed system matters

AU - Lillesø, Jens-Peter Barnekow

AU - Harwood, C.

AU - Derero, Abayneh

AU - Graudal, Lars

AU - Roshetko, J.M.

AU - Kindt, R.

AU - Moestrup, Søren

AU - Omondi, W.O.

AU - Holtne, N.

AU - Mbora, A.

AU - van Breugel, Paulo

AU - Dawson, I.K.

AU - Jamnadass, R.

AU - Egelyng, Henrik

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Rethinking the logic of institutional environments aiming to facilitate agroforestry smallholders in economic development, this paper compares smallholder input supply systems for crop and tree seeds in Sub-Saharan Africa and reflects on two basic challenges: (i) how to develop a large number of relevant tree crops for different agroecologies; (ii) how to reach smallholders in rural areas. Policy options for improving agroforestry input supply systems are discussed, whereby our article concludes with suggestions how sectoral approaches for crop seed systems can be modified to agroforestry seed-seedling systems. Biophysical differences have practical implications for how the logic of the ‘African green revolution’ would be translated into a corresponding revolution for agroforestry.

AB - Rethinking the logic of institutional environments aiming to facilitate agroforestry smallholders in economic development, this paper compares smallholder input supply systems for crop and tree seeds in Sub-Saharan Africa and reflects on two basic challenges: (i) how to develop a large number of relevant tree crops for different agroecologies; (ii) how to reach smallholders in rural areas. Policy options for improving agroforestry input supply systems are discussed, whereby our article concludes with suggestions how sectoral approaches for crop seed systems can be modified to agroforestry seed-seedling systems. Biophysical differences have practical implications for how the logic of the ‘African green revolution’ would be translated into a corresponding revolution for agroforestry.

U2 - 10.1111/dpr.12233

DO - 10.1111/dpr.12233

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - O89-O112

JO - Development Policy Review

JF - Development Policy Review

SN - 0950-6764

IS - Supplement S1

ER -

ID: 157247072