Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial. / Hansen, Anders Bach Bergstrøm; Gerstoft, J.; Kirk, O.; Mathiesen, L.; Pedersen, C.; Nielsen, H.; Jensen-Fangel, S.; Sørensen, Henrik Toft; Obel, N.

I: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Bind 61, Nr. 1, 2008, s. 87-94.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansen, ABB, Gerstoft, J, Kirk, O, Mathiesen, L, Pedersen, C, Nielsen, H, Jensen-Fangel, S, Sørensen, HT & Obel, N 2008, 'Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, bind 61, nr. 1, s. 87-94.

APA

Hansen, A. B. B., Gerstoft, J., Kirk, O., Mathiesen, L., Pedersen, C., Nielsen, H., Jensen-Fangel, S., Sørensen, H. T., & Obel, N. (2008). Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 87-94.

Vancouver

Hansen ABB, Gerstoft J, Kirk O, Mathiesen L, Pedersen C, Nielsen H o.a. Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2008;61(1):87-94.

Author

Hansen, Anders Bach Bergstrøm ; Gerstoft, J. ; Kirk, O. ; Mathiesen, L. ; Pedersen, C. ; Nielsen, H. ; Jensen-Fangel, S. ; Sørensen, Henrik Toft ; Obel, N. / Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial. I: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2008 ; Bind 61, Nr. 1. s. 87-94.

Bibtex

@article{26facc4005ba11deb05e000ea68e967b,
title = "Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected patients initiating equivalent regimens within and outside a randomized controlled trial (RCT). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The Danish Protease Inhibitor Study (DAPIS) was a national multicenter RCT comparing initial treatment with indinavir, ritonavir, or saquinavir/ritonavir during 96 weeks. From the Danish HIV Cohort Study we identified all patients initiating one of these protease-inhibitor-based HAART regimens: 425 patients within DAPIS and 677 outside the trial. We compared viral load, CD4 count response, and mortality. RESULTS: At weeks 96 and 240, trial participants were more likely than nonparticipants to have undetectable viral load (adjusted odds ratio [adOR] 1.28 [95% CI=0.94-1.74] and 1.70 [95% CI=1.16-2.50]) and a CD4 increase > or =100 cells/microl (adOR 1.37 [95% CI=1.03-1.82] and 1.53 [95% CI=1.04-2.25]). For antiretroviral-experienced, but not for antiretroviral-naive patients, trial participants had a lower risk of death (mortality rate ratio [MRR]=0.46 [95% CI=0.27-0.77]) than nonparticipants. This effect was moderated in adjusted analyses (MRR=0.60 [0.33-1.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to nontrial patients, trial participants had better response to HAART. The differences were small defying the notion that results obtained in RCTs are unachievable in routine clinical practice Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1",
author = "Hansen, {Anders Bach Bergstr{\o}m} and J. Gerstoft and O. Kirk and L. Mathiesen and C. Pedersen and H. Nielsen and S. Jensen-Fangel and S{\o}rensen, {Henrik Toft} and N. Obel",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "87--94",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unmeasured confounding caused slightly better response to HAART within than outside a randomized controlled trial

AU - Hansen, Anders Bach Bergstrøm

AU - Gerstoft, J.

AU - Kirk, O.

AU - Mathiesen, L.

AU - Pedersen, C.

AU - Nielsen, H.

AU - Jensen-Fangel, S.

AU - Sørensen, Henrik Toft

AU - Obel, N.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected patients initiating equivalent regimens within and outside a randomized controlled trial (RCT). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The Danish Protease Inhibitor Study (DAPIS) was a national multicenter RCT comparing initial treatment with indinavir, ritonavir, or saquinavir/ritonavir during 96 weeks. From the Danish HIV Cohort Study we identified all patients initiating one of these protease-inhibitor-based HAART regimens: 425 patients within DAPIS and 677 outside the trial. We compared viral load, CD4 count response, and mortality. RESULTS: At weeks 96 and 240, trial participants were more likely than nonparticipants to have undetectable viral load (adjusted odds ratio [adOR] 1.28 [95% CI=0.94-1.74] and 1.70 [95% CI=1.16-2.50]) and a CD4 increase > or =100 cells/microl (adOR 1.37 [95% CI=1.03-1.82] and 1.53 [95% CI=1.04-2.25]). For antiretroviral-experienced, but not for antiretroviral-naive patients, trial participants had a lower risk of death (mortality rate ratio [MRR]=0.46 [95% CI=0.27-0.77]) than nonparticipants. This effect was moderated in adjusted analyses (MRR=0.60 [0.33-1.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to nontrial patients, trial participants had better response to HAART. The differences were small defying the notion that results obtained in RCTs are unachievable in routine clinical practice Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected patients initiating equivalent regimens within and outside a randomized controlled trial (RCT). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The Danish Protease Inhibitor Study (DAPIS) was a national multicenter RCT comparing initial treatment with indinavir, ritonavir, or saquinavir/ritonavir during 96 weeks. From the Danish HIV Cohort Study we identified all patients initiating one of these protease-inhibitor-based HAART regimens: 425 patients within DAPIS and 677 outside the trial. We compared viral load, CD4 count response, and mortality. RESULTS: At weeks 96 and 240, trial participants were more likely than nonparticipants to have undetectable viral load (adjusted odds ratio [adOR] 1.28 [95% CI=0.94-1.74] and 1.70 [95% CI=1.16-2.50]) and a CD4 increase > or =100 cells/microl (adOR 1.37 [95% CI=1.03-1.82] and 1.53 [95% CI=1.04-2.25]). For antiretroviral-experienced, but not for antiretroviral-naive patients, trial participants had a lower risk of death (mortality rate ratio [MRR]=0.46 [95% CI=0.27-0.77]) than nonparticipants. This effect was moderated in adjusted analyses (MRR=0.60 [0.33-1.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to nontrial patients, trial participants had better response to HAART. The differences were small defying the notion that results obtained in RCTs are unachievable in routine clinical practice Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 61

SP - 87

EP - 94

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 10921057