Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report

Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report : A computational approach. / Kyllingsbæk, Søren; Sy, Jocelyn L; Giesbrecht, Barry.

I: Neuropsychologia, Bind 49, Nr. 6, 01.05.2011, s. 1487–1497.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kyllingsbæk, S, Sy, JL & Giesbrecht, B 2011, 'Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach', Neuropsychologia, bind 49, nr. 6, s. 1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039

APA

Kyllingsbæk, S., Sy, J. L., & Giesbrecht, B. (2011). Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039

Vancouver

Kyllingsbæk S, Sy JL, Giesbrecht B. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach. Neuropsychologia. 2011 maj 1;49(6):1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039

Author

Kyllingsbæk, Søren ; Sy, Jocelyn L ; Giesbrecht, Barry. / Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report : A computational approach. I: Neuropsychologia. 2011 ; Bind 49, Nr. 6. s. 1487–1497.

Bibtex

@article{2b9671a50363447688e2576e921b4c19,

title = "Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach",

abstract = "The allocation of visual processing capacity is a key topic in studies and theories of visual attention. The load theory of Lavie (1995) proposes that allocation happens in two steps where processing resources are first allocated to task-relevant stimuli and secondly remaining capacity 'spills over' to task-irrelevant distractors. In contrast, the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) proposed by Bundesen (1990) assumes that allocation happens in a single step where processing capacity is allocated to all stimuli, both task-relevant and task-irrelevant, in proportion to their relative attentional weight. Here we present data from two partial report experiments where we varied the number and discriminability of the task-irrelevant stimuli (Experiment 1) and perceptual load (Experiment 2). The TVA fitted the data of the two experiments well thus favoring the simple explanation with a single step of capacity allocation. We also show that the effects of varying perceptual load can only be explained by a combined effect of allocation of processing capacity as well as limits in visual working memory. Finally, we link the results to processing capacity understood at the neural level based on the neural theory of visual attention by Bundesen et al. (2005).",

author = "S{\o}ren Kyllingsb{\ae}k and Sy, {Jocelyn L} and Barry Giesbrecht",

year = "2011",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "1487–1497",

journal = "Neuropsychologia",

issn = "0028-3932",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report

T2 - A computational approach

AU - Kyllingsbæk, Søren

AU - Sy, Jocelyn L

AU - Giesbrecht, Barry

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - The allocation of visual processing capacity is a key topic in studies and theories of visual attention. The load theory of Lavie (1995) proposes that allocation happens in two steps where processing resources are first allocated to task-relevant stimuli and secondly remaining capacity 'spills over' to task-irrelevant distractors. In contrast, the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) proposed by Bundesen (1990) assumes that allocation happens in a single step where processing capacity is allocated to all stimuli, both task-relevant and task-irrelevant, in proportion to their relative attentional weight. Here we present data from two partial report experiments where we varied the number and discriminability of the task-irrelevant stimuli (Experiment 1) and perceptual load (Experiment 2). The TVA fitted the data of the two experiments well thus favoring the simple explanation with a single step of capacity allocation. We also show that the effects of varying perceptual load can only be explained by a combined effect of allocation of processing capacity as well as limits in visual working memory. Finally, we link the results to processing capacity understood at the neural level based on the neural theory of visual attention by Bundesen et al. (2005).

AB - The allocation of visual processing capacity is a key topic in studies and theories of visual attention. The load theory of Lavie (1995) proposes that allocation happens in two steps where processing resources are first allocated to task-relevant stimuli and secondly remaining capacity 'spills over' to task-irrelevant distractors. In contrast, the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) proposed by Bundesen (1990) assumes that allocation happens in a single step where processing capacity is allocated to all stimuli, both task-relevant and task-irrelevant, in proportion to their relative attentional weight. Here we present data from two partial report experiments where we varied the number and discriminability of the task-irrelevant stimuli (Experiment 1) and perceptual load (Experiment 2). The TVA fitted the data of the two experiments well thus favoring the simple explanation with a single step of capacity allocation. We also show that the effects of varying perceptual load can only be explained by a combined effect of allocation of processing capacity as well as limits in visual working memory. Finally, we link the results to processing capacity understood at the neural level based on the neural theory of visual attention by Bundesen et al. (2005).

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21145901

VL - 49

SP - 1487

EP - 1497

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 32639931