Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector. / Hansen, Henrik; Rand, John; Trifkovic, Neda.

2021. s. 1-22.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Hansen, H, Rand, J & Trifkovic, N 2021 'Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector' s. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/979-2

APA

Hansen, H., Rand, J., & Trifkovic, N. (2021). Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector. (s. 1-22). WIDER Working Paper Bind 2021 Nr. 41 https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/979-2

Vancouver

Hansen H, Rand J, Trifkovic N. Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector. 2021, s. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/979-2

Author

Hansen, Henrik ; Rand, John ; Trifkovic, Neda. / Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector. 2021. s. 1-22 (WIDER Working Paper; Nr. 41, Bind 2021).

Bibtex

@techreport{48a72a583f9f4f7db498016181f06364,
title = "Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector",
abstract = "Employer-provided benefits are independent elements in the compensation packages that make up firms{\textquoteright} payment strategies. Such benefits are aimed at attracting and retaining preferred employees and improving incentives. In Myanmar, there are two employee benefit systems: (1) an unregulated traditional system in which firms offer their employees in-kind benefits such as meals and accommodation; and (2) a modern mandatory system in which firms are requiredby law to offer payment schemes such as payment-while-absent and compensation for accidents. Using a survey of matched employers and employees in the manufacturing sector in Myanmar, we identify firms and workers that supply and demand the two types of employee benefits. We showthat traditional benefits are widely supplied and demanded, while modern benefits are supplied by fewer firms and provided to fewer workers. We analyse the relative importance of a range of observable firm and worker attributes that may be associated with the supply and demand for the benefits. We find that firms that provide accommodation appear to attract young, unmarried,uneducated workers who are often migrants, and who, on average, receive lower wages compared to similar workers who do not receive equal in-kind payments. Large firms are more likely to offer the modern benefits and highly educated workers are more likely to demand them. Moreover, workers who receive modern benefits tend to stay longer with the firm and the benefit appears not to have an adverse impact on their wage level. Our findings indicate that both types of benefits contribute to sorting in the labour market. Therefore, both must be considered when labour laws are amended. Moreover, if increased minimum wages are accompanied by reduced provision of traditional in-kind benefits to low-wage workers, then there is a real risk that inequality in consumption will increase even though wage inequality decreases.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, compensation packages, employee benefits, labour law, Myanmar",
author = "Henrik Hansen and John Rand and Neda Trifkovic",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/979-2",
language = "English",
series = "WIDER Working Paper",
number = "41",
pages = "1--22",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector

AU - Hansen, Henrik

AU - Rand, John

AU - Trifkovic, Neda

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Employer-provided benefits are independent elements in the compensation packages that make up firms’ payment strategies. Such benefits are aimed at attracting and retaining preferred employees and improving incentives. In Myanmar, there are two employee benefit systems: (1) an unregulated traditional system in which firms offer their employees in-kind benefits such as meals and accommodation; and (2) a modern mandatory system in which firms are requiredby law to offer payment schemes such as payment-while-absent and compensation for accidents. Using a survey of matched employers and employees in the manufacturing sector in Myanmar, we identify firms and workers that supply and demand the two types of employee benefits. We showthat traditional benefits are widely supplied and demanded, while modern benefits are supplied by fewer firms and provided to fewer workers. We analyse the relative importance of a range of observable firm and worker attributes that may be associated with the supply and demand for the benefits. We find that firms that provide accommodation appear to attract young, unmarried,uneducated workers who are often migrants, and who, on average, receive lower wages compared to similar workers who do not receive equal in-kind payments. Large firms are more likely to offer the modern benefits and highly educated workers are more likely to demand them. Moreover, workers who receive modern benefits tend to stay longer with the firm and the benefit appears not to have an adverse impact on their wage level. Our findings indicate that both types of benefits contribute to sorting in the labour market. Therefore, both must be considered when labour laws are amended. Moreover, if increased minimum wages are accompanied by reduced provision of traditional in-kind benefits to low-wage workers, then there is a real risk that inequality in consumption will increase even though wage inequality decreases.

AB - Employer-provided benefits are independent elements in the compensation packages that make up firms’ payment strategies. Such benefits are aimed at attracting and retaining preferred employees and improving incentives. In Myanmar, there are two employee benefit systems: (1) an unregulated traditional system in which firms offer their employees in-kind benefits such as meals and accommodation; and (2) a modern mandatory system in which firms are requiredby law to offer payment schemes such as payment-while-absent and compensation for accidents. Using a survey of matched employers and employees in the manufacturing sector in Myanmar, we identify firms and workers that supply and demand the two types of employee benefits. We showthat traditional benefits are widely supplied and demanded, while modern benefits are supplied by fewer firms and provided to fewer workers. We analyse the relative importance of a range of observable firm and worker attributes that may be associated with the supply and demand for the benefits. We find that firms that provide accommodation appear to attract young, unmarried,uneducated workers who are often migrants, and who, on average, receive lower wages compared to similar workers who do not receive equal in-kind payments. Large firms are more likely to offer the modern benefits and highly educated workers are more likely to demand them. Moreover, workers who receive modern benefits tend to stay longer with the firm and the benefit appears not to have an adverse impact on their wage level. Our findings indicate that both types of benefits contribute to sorting in the labour market. Therefore, both must be considered when labour laws are amended. Moreover, if increased minimum wages are accompanied by reduced provision of traditional in-kind benefits to low-wage workers, then there is a real risk that inequality in consumption will increase even though wage inequality decreases.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - compensation packages

KW - employee benefits

KW - labour law

KW - Myanmar

U2 - 10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/979-2

DO - 10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/979-2

M3 - Working paper

T3 - WIDER Working Paper

SP - 1

EP - 22

BT - Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector

ER -

ID: 291607647