The rejection of knowing
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The rejection of knowing. / Zeuthen, Katrine Egede.
I: Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, Bind 45, Nr. 2, 09.08.2022, s. 106-115.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The rejection of knowing
AU - Zeuthen, Katrine Egede
PY - 2022/8/9
Y1 - 2022/8/9
N2 - Cases of child sexual trauma are rarely understood in ways that lead to a clear separation of an internal and external reality. The child’s as well as the professionals’ meaning making process requires time, patience and listening rather than isolated structured observations, a process that opposes an empirical paradigm dictating what reality is, where to look for it and how. Just as the myth of King Oedipus deals with the significance of the outer reality and how it affects the inner world, various developments of psychoanalytic theory and practice have through time unfolded different descriptions of how we should understand the relation between our analysands’ outer world, and the world they present to us in the analytic room. Through case-material from two child analyses with children addicted to sexual excitement and with the theories of Laplanche and Lacan and the myth of Oedipus, the paper argues that the children’s expressions represent the enigmatic approach of the other as always being inside and also outside – always for real and in fantasy. Because children cannot find the answer in themselves, they act in realized ways that put the analyst to work in a position of not knowing.
AB - Cases of child sexual trauma are rarely understood in ways that lead to a clear separation of an internal and external reality. The child’s as well as the professionals’ meaning making process requires time, patience and listening rather than isolated structured observations, a process that opposes an empirical paradigm dictating what reality is, where to look for it and how. Just as the myth of King Oedipus deals with the significance of the outer reality and how it affects the inner world, various developments of psychoanalytic theory and practice have through time unfolded different descriptions of how we should understand the relation between our analysands’ outer world, and the world they present to us in the analytic room. Through case-material from two child analyses with children addicted to sexual excitement and with the theories of Laplanche and Lacan and the myth of Oedipus, the paper argues that the children’s expressions represent the enigmatic approach of the other as always being inside and also outside – always for real and in fantasy. Because children cannot find the answer in themselves, they act in realized ways that put the analyst to work in a position of not knowing.
U2 - 10.1080/01062301.2023.2260614
DO - 10.1080/01062301.2023.2260614
M3 - Journal article
VL - 45
SP - 106
EP - 115
JO - Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review
JF - Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review
SN - 0106-2301
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 234146191