The pre-supplementary motor area achieves inhibitory control by modulating response thresholds

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,39 MB, PDF-dokument

The pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) is central for the initiation and inhibition of voluntary action. For the execution of action, the pre-SMA optimises the decision of which action to choose by adjusting the thresholds for the required evidence for each choice. However, it remains unclear how the pre-SMA contributes to action inhibition. Here, we use computational modelling of a stop/no-go task, performed by an adult with a focal lesion in the pre-SMA, and 52 age-matched controls. We show that the patient required more time to successfully inhibit an action (longer stop-signal reaction time) but was faster in terms of go reaction times. Computational modelling revealed that the patient's failure to stop was explained by a significantly lower response threshold for initiating an action, as compared to controls, suggesting that the patient needed less evidence before committing to an action. A similarly specific impairment was also observed for the decision of which action to choose. Together, our results suggest that dynamic threshold modulation may be a general mechanism by which the pre-SMA exerts its control over voluntary action.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCortex
Vol/bind152
Sider (fra-til)98-108
Antal sider11
ISSN0010-9452
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience for sharing the data acquired in healthy controls. This work was supported by the James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative (Scholar Award to JBR in Understanding Human Cognition) and the Wellcome Trust ( 103838 ). NW is funded by a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) , Academic Clinical Fellowship ( ACF-2019-14-013 ). JBR is supported by the Medical Research Council intramural programme ( SUAG/051 G101400 ). FHH was supported by a Cambridge Trust Vice-Chancellor's Award and Fitzwilliam College Scholarship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS , the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care .

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)

ID: 314064074