Systematic review and meta-analysis: assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Systematic review and meta-analysis : assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index. / Lo, B; Prosberg, M V; Gluud, L L; Chan, W; Leong, R W; van der List, E; van der Have, M; Sarter, H; Gower-Rousseau, C; Peyrin-Biroulet, L; Vind, I; Burisch, J.

I: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Bind 47, Nr. 1, 01.2018, s. 6-15.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lo, B, Prosberg, MV, Gluud, LL, Chan, W, Leong, RW, van der List, E, van der Have, M, Sarter, H, Gower-Rousseau, C, Peyrin-Biroulet, L, Vind, I & Burisch, J 2018, 'Systematic review and meta-analysis: assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index', Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, bind 47, nr. 1, s. 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14373

APA

Lo, B., Prosberg, M. V., Gluud, L. L., Chan, W., Leong, R. W., van der List, E., van der Have, M., Sarter, H., Gower-Rousseau, C., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Vind, I., & Burisch, J. (2018). Systematic review and meta-analysis: assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 47(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14373

Vancouver

Lo B, Prosberg MV, Gluud LL, Chan W, Leong RW, van der List E o.a. Systematic review and meta-analysis: assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2018 jan.;47(1):6-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14373

Author

Lo, B ; Prosberg, M V ; Gluud, L L ; Chan, W ; Leong, R W ; van der List, E ; van der Have, M ; Sarter, H ; Gower-Rousseau, C ; Peyrin-Biroulet, L ; Vind, I ; Burisch, J. / Systematic review and meta-analysis : assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index. I: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2018 ; Bind 47, Nr. 1. s. 6-15.

Bibtex

@article{0fc0004ee4ba4619bdf1f8248925f712,
title = "Systematic review and meta-analysis: assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index (IBD-DI) has recently been developed for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).AIM: To assess the severity of disability and associated factors using the IBD-DI, and review the validity of the IBD-DI as a tool.METHOD: Systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Patients included had UC or CD and were classified as active, in remission, or needing surgery, biological and/or steroid treatment. We included studies assessing disability using the IBD-DI and that were captured by electronic and manual searches (January 2017). The possibility of bias was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.RESULTS: Nine studies were included with 3167 patients. Comparatively, patients with active disease had higher disability rates than those in remission (SMD [CI95] = 1.49[1.11, 1.88], I(2) = 94%, P<.01), while patients on biological treatment had lower disability rates than those receiving corticosteroid treatment (SMD [CI95] = -0.22[-0.36, -0.08], I(2) = 0%, P<.01). Disease activity and unemployment were found to be associated factors. The IBD-DI scored {"}good{"} for internal consistency, {"}fair{"} to {"}excellent{"} for intra-rater reliability and {"}excellent{"} for inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was {"}moderately strong{"} to {"}very strong{"} and structural validity was found to be mainly unidimensional. The IBD-DI had excellent responsiveness, while its interpretability was only useful on a group level.CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant association between disease activity, treatment received and disability; although significant heterogeneity was found. The IBD-DI is reliable and valid, but further studies are needed to measure its interpretability.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review",
author = "B Lo and Prosberg, {M V} and Gluud, {L L} and W Chan and Leong, {R W} and {van der List}, E and {van der Have}, M and H Sarter and C Gower-Rousseau and L Peyrin-Biroulet and I Vind and J Burisch",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/apt.14373",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "6--15",
journal = "Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Supplement",
issn = "0953-0673",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review and meta-analysis

T2 - assessment of factors affecting disability in inflammatory bowel disease and the reliability of the inflammatory bowel disease disability index

AU - Lo, B

AU - Prosberg, M V

AU - Gluud, L L

AU - Chan, W

AU - Leong, R W

AU - van der List, E

AU - van der Have, M

AU - Sarter, H

AU - Gower-Rousseau, C

AU - Peyrin-Biroulet, L

AU - Vind, I

AU - Burisch, J

N1 - © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index (IBD-DI) has recently been developed for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).AIM: To assess the severity of disability and associated factors using the IBD-DI, and review the validity of the IBD-DI as a tool.METHOD: Systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Patients included had UC or CD and were classified as active, in remission, or needing surgery, biological and/or steroid treatment. We included studies assessing disability using the IBD-DI and that were captured by electronic and manual searches (January 2017). The possibility of bias was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.RESULTS: Nine studies were included with 3167 patients. Comparatively, patients with active disease had higher disability rates than those in remission (SMD [CI95] = 1.49[1.11, 1.88], I(2) = 94%, P<.01), while patients on biological treatment had lower disability rates than those receiving corticosteroid treatment (SMD [CI95] = -0.22[-0.36, -0.08], I(2) = 0%, P<.01). Disease activity and unemployment were found to be associated factors. The IBD-DI scored "good" for internal consistency, "fair" to "excellent" for intra-rater reliability and "excellent" for inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was "moderately strong" to "very strong" and structural validity was found to be mainly unidimensional. The IBD-DI had excellent responsiveness, while its interpretability was only useful on a group level.CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant association between disease activity, treatment received and disability; although significant heterogeneity was found. The IBD-DI is reliable and valid, but further studies are needed to measure its interpretability.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index (IBD-DI) has recently been developed for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).AIM: To assess the severity of disability and associated factors using the IBD-DI, and review the validity of the IBD-DI as a tool.METHOD: Systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Patients included had UC or CD and were classified as active, in remission, or needing surgery, biological and/or steroid treatment. We included studies assessing disability using the IBD-DI and that were captured by electronic and manual searches (January 2017). The possibility of bias was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.RESULTS: Nine studies were included with 3167 patients. Comparatively, patients with active disease had higher disability rates than those in remission (SMD [CI95] = 1.49[1.11, 1.88], I(2) = 94%, P<.01), while patients on biological treatment had lower disability rates than those receiving corticosteroid treatment (SMD [CI95] = -0.22[-0.36, -0.08], I(2) = 0%, P<.01). Disease activity and unemployment were found to be associated factors. The IBD-DI scored "good" for internal consistency, "fair" to "excellent" for intra-rater reliability and "excellent" for inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was "moderately strong" to "very strong" and structural validity was found to be mainly unidimensional. The IBD-DI had excellent responsiveness, while its interpretability was only useful on a group level.CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant association between disease activity, treatment received and disability; although significant heterogeneity was found. The IBD-DI is reliable and valid, but further studies are needed to measure its interpretability.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1111/apt.14373

DO - 10.1111/apt.14373

M3 - Review

C2 - 28994131

VL - 47

SP - 6

EP - 15

JO - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Supplement

JF - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Supplement

SN - 0953-0673

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 186086843