Survival and adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation at left ventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,49 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Christiaan F.J. Antonides
  • Yunus C. Yalcin
  • Kevin M. Veen
  • Rahatullah Muslem
  • Theo M.M.H. De By
  • Ad J.J.C. Bogers
  • Gustafsson, Finn
  • Kadir Caliskan

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for mortality and cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) and is common in patients with heart failure. This study evaluated survival and adverse events in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and a history of AF in the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support. METHODS: Patients with a continuous-flow LVAD, AF or sinus rhythm (SR) and a follow-up were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses for survival (including a propensity-scored matched analysis), freedom from CVA, pump thrombosis, bleeding and a composite of pump thrombosis/CVA were performed. To correct for covariate imbalance, a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was performed after propensity score (PS) matching the groups. Finally, a Cox regression was performed for predictors of lower survival. RESULTS: Overall, 1821 patients (83% male) were included, with a median age of 57 years and a median follow-up of 13.1 months (interquartile range: 4.3-27.7). Preoperative Electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm was AF in 421 (23.1%) and SR in 1400 (76.9%) patients. Patients with pre-LVAD AF had a lower ≤90-day (81.9% vs 87.1%, P = 0.0047) and 4-year (35.4% vs 44.2%, P = 0.0083) survival compared to SR. KM analysis with PS matching groups revealed a trend (P = 0.087) towards decreased survival. Univariable analyses confirmed pre-LVAD AF as a predictor for mortality, but the multivariable analysis did not. No difference in the rate of adverse events was found. An analysis of patients at 24 months revealed a higher rate of CVAs for pre-LVAD AF patients (77% vs 94.3%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-LVAD AF undergoing LVAD implantation had a worse survival. However, after performing a multivariate analysis, and PS matching analysis, AF was no longer significant, indicating a worser preoperative condition in these patients. Concerning thrombo-embolic events, only patients with pre-LVAD AF alive beyond 24 months have a higher risk of CVAs.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Vol/bind61
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)1164-1175
Antal sider12
ISSN1010-7940
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

ID: 308362105