Severe toxicity free survival: physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Severe toxicity free survival : physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia. / Ponte di Legno Severe Toxicity Working Group.

I: The Lancet Haematology, Bind 8, Nr. 7, 07.2021, s. e513-e523.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ponte di Legno Severe Toxicity Working Group 2021, 'Severe toxicity free survival: physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia', The Lancet Haematology, bind 8, nr. 7, s. e513-e523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00136-8

APA

Ponte di Legno Severe Toxicity Working Group (2021). Severe toxicity free survival: physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia. The Lancet Haematology, 8(7), e513-e523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00136-8

Vancouver

Ponte di Legno Severe Toxicity Working Group. Severe toxicity free survival: physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia. The Lancet Haematology. 2021 jul.;8(7):e513-e523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00136-8

Author

Ponte di Legno Severe Toxicity Working Group. / Severe toxicity free survival : physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia. I: The Lancet Haematology. 2021 ; Bind 8, Nr. 7. s. e513-e523.

Bibtex

@article{4940cffb10ce4d7fae24fd907219dd33,
title = "Severe toxicity free survival: physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia",
abstract = "5-year overall survival rates have surpassed 90% for childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia, but survivors are at risk for permanent health sequelae. Although event-free survival appropriately represents the outcome for cancers with poor overall survival, this metric is inadequate when cure rates are high but challenged by serious, persistent complications. Accordingly, a group of experts in paediatric haematology–oncology, representative of 17 international acute lymphocytic leukaemia study groups, launched an initiative to construct a measure, designated severe toxicity-free survival (STFS), to quantify the occurrence of physician-prioritised toxicities to be integrated with standard cancer outcome reporting. Five generic inclusion criteria (not present before cancer diagnosis, symptomatic, objectifiable, of unacceptable severity, permanent, or requiring unacceptable treatments) were used to assess 855 health conditions, which resulted in inclusion of 21 severe toxicities. Consensus definitions were reached through a modified Delphi process supplemented by two additional plenary meetings. The 21 severe toxicities include severe adverse health conditions that substantially affect activities of daily living and are refractory to therapy (eg, refractory seizures), are without therapeutic options (eg, blindness), or require substantially invasive treatment (eg, cardiac transplantation). Incorporation of STFS assessment into clinical trials has the potential to improve and diversify treatment strategies, focusing not only on traditional outcome events and overall survival but also the frequencies of the most severe toxicities. The two major aims of this Review were to: prioritise and define unacceptable long-term toxicity for patients with childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia, and define how these toxicities should be combined into a composite quantity to be integrated with other reported outcomes. Although STFS quantifies the clinically unacceptable health tradeoff for cure using childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia as a model disease, the prioritised severe toxicities are based on generic considerations of relevance to any other cancer diagnosis and age group.",
author = "Liv Andr{\'e}s-Jensen and Andishe Attarbaschi and Edit Bardi and Shlomit Barzilai-Birenboim and Deepa Bhojwani and Hagleitner, {Melanie M.} and Christina Halsey and Arja Harila-Saari and {van Litsenburg}, {Raphaele R.L.} and Hudson, {Melissa M.} and Sima Jeha and Motohiro Kato and Leontien Kremer and Wojciech Mlynarski and Anja M{\"o}ricke and Rob Pieters and Caroline Piette and Elizabeth Raetz and Leila Ronceray and Claudia Toro and {Grazia Valsecchi}, Maria and Lynda Vrooman and Sigal Weinreb and Naomi Winick and Kjeld Schmiegelow and Adams, {Madeline R.} and Liv Andres-Jensen and Katja Baust and Tineke Boesten and Gabriele Calaminus and Rachel Conyers and Darlington, {Anne Sophie} and {de Ville}, Ma{\"e}lle and Gabriele Escherich and Melanie Hagleitner and Hou, {Jen Yin} and Huang, {Ting Huan} and Melissa Hudson and Meriel Jenney and Maryna Krawczuk-Rybak and Leontine Kremer and Melchior Lautem and Liu, {Hse Che} and {Lopez Lopez}, Elixabet and Marion Mateos and Katarzyna Muszynska-Roslan and Riitta Niinimaki and Toby Trahair and Valsecchi, {Maria Grazia} and {van der Sluis}, Inge and {Ponte di Legno Severe Toxicity Working Group}",
note = "Funding Information: ER reports grants from Pfizer and has been on a data and safety monitoring board for Celgene, outside the submitted work. KS reports personal fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Servier, Amgen, and Medscape, and personal fees and grants from Servier, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests. Funding Information: The study presented in this Review was funded by the Danish Cancer Society and the Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation. The funder of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and final responsibility to submit for publication. We thank all who have contributed to discussions, scrutinising of literature, development of working documents and initial definitions. All contributors are mentioned in the appendix (pp 2–3) . All authors have access to all the data presented in this Review. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00136-8",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "e513--e523",
journal = "The Lancet Haematology",
issn = "2352-3026",
publisher = "The Lancet Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Severe toxicity free survival

T2 - physician-derived definitions of unacceptable long-term toxicities following acute lymphocytic leukaemia

AU - Andrés-Jensen, Liv

AU - Attarbaschi, Andishe

AU - Bardi, Edit

AU - Barzilai-Birenboim, Shlomit

AU - Bhojwani, Deepa

AU - Hagleitner, Melanie M.

AU - Halsey, Christina

AU - Harila-Saari, Arja

AU - van Litsenburg, Raphaele R.L.

AU - Hudson, Melissa M.

AU - Jeha, Sima

AU - Kato, Motohiro

AU - Kremer, Leontien

AU - Mlynarski, Wojciech

AU - Möricke, Anja

AU - Pieters, Rob

AU - Piette, Caroline

AU - Raetz, Elizabeth

AU - Ronceray, Leila

AU - Toro, Claudia

AU - Grazia Valsecchi, Maria

AU - Vrooman, Lynda

AU - Weinreb, Sigal

AU - Winick, Naomi

AU - Schmiegelow, Kjeld

AU - Adams, Madeline R.

AU - Andres-Jensen, Liv

AU - Baust, Katja

AU - Boesten, Tineke

AU - Calaminus, Gabriele

AU - Conyers, Rachel

AU - Darlington, Anne Sophie

AU - de Ville, Maëlle

AU - Escherich, Gabriele

AU - Hagleitner, Melanie

AU - Hou, Jen Yin

AU - Huang, Ting Huan

AU - Hudson, Melissa

AU - Jenney, Meriel

AU - Krawczuk-Rybak, Maryna

AU - Kremer, Leontine

AU - Lautem, Melchior

AU - Liu, Hse Che

AU - Lopez Lopez, Elixabet

AU - Mateos, Marion

AU - Muszynska-Roslan, Katarzyna

AU - Niinimaki, Riitta

AU - Trahair, Toby

AU - Valsecchi, Maria Grazia

AU - van der Sluis, Inge

AU - Ponte di Legno Severe Toxicity Working Group

N1 - Funding Information: ER reports grants from Pfizer and has been on a data and safety monitoring board for Celgene, outside the submitted work. KS reports personal fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Servier, Amgen, and Medscape, and personal fees and grants from Servier, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests. Funding Information: The study presented in this Review was funded by the Danish Cancer Society and the Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation. The funder of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and final responsibility to submit for publication. We thank all who have contributed to discussions, scrutinising of literature, development of working documents and initial definitions. All contributors are mentioned in the appendix (pp 2–3) . All authors have access to all the data presented in this Review. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - 5-year overall survival rates have surpassed 90% for childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia, but survivors are at risk for permanent health sequelae. Although event-free survival appropriately represents the outcome for cancers with poor overall survival, this metric is inadequate when cure rates are high but challenged by serious, persistent complications. Accordingly, a group of experts in paediatric haematology–oncology, representative of 17 international acute lymphocytic leukaemia study groups, launched an initiative to construct a measure, designated severe toxicity-free survival (STFS), to quantify the occurrence of physician-prioritised toxicities to be integrated with standard cancer outcome reporting. Five generic inclusion criteria (not present before cancer diagnosis, symptomatic, objectifiable, of unacceptable severity, permanent, or requiring unacceptable treatments) were used to assess 855 health conditions, which resulted in inclusion of 21 severe toxicities. Consensus definitions were reached through a modified Delphi process supplemented by two additional plenary meetings. The 21 severe toxicities include severe adverse health conditions that substantially affect activities of daily living and are refractory to therapy (eg, refractory seizures), are without therapeutic options (eg, blindness), or require substantially invasive treatment (eg, cardiac transplantation). Incorporation of STFS assessment into clinical trials has the potential to improve and diversify treatment strategies, focusing not only on traditional outcome events and overall survival but also the frequencies of the most severe toxicities. The two major aims of this Review were to: prioritise and define unacceptable long-term toxicity for patients with childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia, and define how these toxicities should be combined into a composite quantity to be integrated with other reported outcomes. Although STFS quantifies the clinically unacceptable health tradeoff for cure using childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia as a model disease, the prioritised severe toxicities are based on generic considerations of relevance to any other cancer diagnosis and age group.

AB - 5-year overall survival rates have surpassed 90% for childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia, but survivors are at risk for permanent health sequelae. Although event-free survival appropriately represents the outcome for cancers with poor overall survival, this metric is inadequate when cure rates are high but challenged by serious, persistent complications. Accordingly, a group of experts in paediatric haematology–oncology, representative of 17 international acute lymphocytic leukaemia study groups, launched an initiative to construct a measure, designated severe toxicity-free survival (STFS), to quantify the occurrence of physician-prioritised toxicities to be integrated with standard cancer outcome reporting. Five generic inclusion criteria (not present before cancer diagnosis, symptomatic, objectifiable, of unacceptable severity, permanent, or requiring unacceptable treatments) were used to assess 855 health conditions, which resulted in inclusion of 21 severe toxicities. Consensus definitions were reached through a modified Delphi process supplemented by two additional plenary meetings. The 21 severe toxicities include severe adverse health conditions that substantially affect activities of daily living and are refractory to therapy (eg, refractory seizures), are without therapeutic options (eg, blindness), or require substantially invasive treatment (eg, cardiac transplantation). Incorporation of STFS assessment into clinical trials has the potential to improve and diversify treatment strategies, focusing not only on traditional outcome events and overall survival but also the frequencies of the most severe toxicities. The two major aims of this Review were to: prioritise and define unacceptable long-term toxicity for patients with childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia, and define how these toxicities should be combined into a composite quantity to be integrated with other reported outcomes. Although STFS quantifies the clinically unacceptable health tradeoff for cure using childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia as a model disease, the prioritised severe toxicities are based on generic considerations of relevance to any other cancer diagnosis and age group.

U2 - 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00136-8

DO - 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00136-8

M3 - Review

C2 - 34171282

AN - SCOPUS:85108333882

VL - 8

SP - e513-e523

JO - The Lancet Haematology

JF - The Lancet Haematology

SN - 2352-3026

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 273070629