Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer : a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial. / Bjerre, Eik Dybboe; Weller, Sarah; Poulsen, Mads Hvid; Madsen, Soren Sorensen; Bjerre, Rie Dybboe; ostergren, Peter Busch; Borre, Michael; Brasso, Klaus; Midtgaard, Julie.

I: Sports Medicine - Open, Bind 7, Nr. 1, 27, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bjerre, ED, Weller, S, Poulsen, MH, Madsen, SS, Bjerre, RD, ostergren, PB, Borre, M, Brasso, K & Midtgaard, J 2021, 'Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial', Sports Medicine - Open, bind 7, nr. 1, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00318-6

APA

Bjerre, E. D., Weller, S., Poulsen, M. H., Madsen, S. S., Bjerre, R. D., ostergren, P. B., Borre, M., Brasso, K., & Midtgaard, J. (2021). Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial. Sports Medicine - Open, 7(1), [27]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00318-6

Vancouver

Bjerre ED, Weller S, Poulsen MH, Madsen SS, Bjerre RD, ostergren PB o.a. Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial. Sports Medicine - Open. 2021;7(1). 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00318-6

Author

Bjerre, Eik Dybboe ; Weller, Sarah ; Poulsen, Mads Hvid ; Madsen, Soren Sorensen ; Bjerre, Rie Dybboe ; ostergren, Peter Busch ; Borre, Michael ; Brasso, Klaus ; Midtgaard, Julie. / Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer : a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial. I: Sports Medicine - Open. 2021 ; Bind 7, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{fd9dc8b7c0ba4349b8da92ef7f7242fe,
title = "Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background Skeletal metastatic disease excludes many cancer patients from participating in exercise and physical activity due to safety concerns. Empirical evidence from high-quality trials is warranted to guide clinicians and patients. Objective To evaluate the safety and potential benefits of high-impact aerobic exercise in patients with prostate cancer with skeletal metastases. Design Exploratory subgroup analysis of a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel randomised controlled trial. Setting The trial recruited 214 patients from five hospital urological departments in Denmark. Participants Patients with prostate cancer with skeletal metastases (n = 41). Intervention Six months of football training twice weekly at a local club or usual care. Both groups received brief information on physical activity recommendations at the time of randomisation. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Safety, defined as falls, fractures and hospital admissions. Effects were evaluated on the primary outcome (prostate cancer-specific quality of life) and secondary outcomes (lean body mass, fat mass, hip and spine bone mineral density, and general physical and mental health). Results The original trial comprised 214 participants, 41 of whom had skeletal metastases at enrolment. Of these, 22 were allocated to football and 19 to usual care. The trial retention rate was 95% at 12 weeks and 88% at 6 months. Football participants attended 13 sessions on average at 12 weeks and 23 at 6 months. There were two falls, one in each group after 6 months, and no fractures. There were four unplanned hospital admissions in the study period, all four in the usual care group. Statistically significant between-group difference was observed in the primary outcome change in prostate cancer-specific quality of life at 12 weeks (7.6 points [95% CI 0.5 to 15.0]; P = 0.038). No statistical changes were found in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion The analysis showed that football training was safe in patients with skeletal metastatic prostate cancer and significantly improved quality of life. Larger analyses and/or trials are warranted to confirm the safety of exercise more broadly in cancer patients with skeletal metastatic disease.",
keywords = "Soccer, Cancer survivor, Community, Exercise, Rehabilitation",
author = "Bjerre, {Eik Dybboe} and Sarah Weller and Poulsen, {Mads Hvid} and Madsen, {Soren Sorensen} and Bjerre, {Rie Dybboe} and ostergren, {Peter Busch} and Michael Borre and Klaus Brasso and Julie Midtgaard",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1186/s40798-021-00318-6",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Sports Medicine - Open",
issn = "2199-1170",
publisher = "Springer Open",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and Effects of Football in Skeletal Metastatic Prostate Cancer

T2 - a Subgroup Analysis of the FC Prostate Community Randomised Controlled Trial

AU - Bjerre, Eik Dybboe

AU - Weller, Sarah

AU - Poulsen, Mads Hvid

AU - Madsen, Soren Sorensen

AU - Bjerre, Rie Dybboe

AU - ostergren, Peter Busch

AU - Borre, Michael

AU - Brasso, Klaus

AU - Midtgaard, Julie

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background Skeletal metastatic disease excludes many cancer patients from participating in exercise and physical activity due to safety concerns. Empirical evidence from high-quality trials is warranted to guide clinicians and patients. Objective To evaluate the safety and potential benefits of high-impact aerobic exercise in patients with prostate cancer with skeletal metastases. Design Exploratory subgroup analysis of a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel randomised controlled trial. Setting The trial recruited 214 patients from five hospital urological departments in Denmark. Participants Patients with prostate cancer with skeletal metastases (n = 41). Intervention Six months of football training twice weekly at a local club or usual care. Both groups received brief information on physical activity recommendations at the time of randomisation. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Safety, defined as falls, fractures and hospital admissions. Effects were evaluated on the primary outcome (prostate cancer-specific quality of life) and secondary outcomes (lean body mass, fat mass, hip and spine bone mineral density, and general physical and mental health). Results The original trial comprised 214 participants, 41 of whom had skeletal metastases at enrolment. Of these, 22 were allocated to football and 19 to usual care. The trial retention rate was 95% at 12 weeks and 88% at 6 months. Football participants attended 13 sessions on average at 12 weeks and 23 at 6 months. There were two falls, one in each group after 6 months, and no fractures. There were four unplanned hospital admissions in the study period, all four in the usual care group. Statistically significant between-group difference was observed in the primary outcome change in prostate cancer-specific quality of life at 12 weeks (7.6 points [95% CI 0.5 to 15.0]; P = 0.038). No statistical changes were found in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion The analysis showed that football training was safe in patients with skeletal metastatic prostate cancer and significantly improved quality of life. Larger analyses and/or trials are warranted to confirm the safety of exercise more broadly in cancer patients with skeletal metastatic disease.

AB - Background Skeletal metastatic disease excludes many cancer patients from participating in exercise and physical activity due to safety concerns. Empirical evidence from high-quality trials is warranted to guide clinicians and patients. Objective To evaluate the safety and potential benefits of high-impact aerobic exercise in patients with prostate cancer with skeletal metastases. Design Exploratory subgroup analysis of a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel randomised controlled trial. Setting The trial recruited 214 patients from five hospital urological departments in Denmark. Participants Patients with prostate cancer with skeletal metastases (n = 41). Intervention Six months of football training twice weekly at a local club or usual care. Both groups received brief information on physical activity recommendations at the time of randomisation. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Safety, defined as falls, fractures and hospital admissions. Effects were evaluated on the primary outcome (prostate cancer-specific quality of life) and secondary outcomes (lean body mass, fat mass, hip and spine bone mineral density, and general physical and mental health). Results The original trial comprised 214 participants, 41 of whom had skeletal metastases at enrolment. Of these, 22 were allocated to football and 19 to usual care. The trial retention rate was 95% at 12 weeks and 88% at 6 months. Football participants attended 13 sessions on average at 12 weeks and 23 at 6 months. There were two falls, one in each group after 6 months, and no fractures. There were four unplanned hospital admissions in the study period, all four in the usual care group. Statistically significant between-group difference was observed in the primary outcome change in prostate cancer-specific quality of life at 12 weeks (7.6 points [95% CI 0.5 to 15.0]; P = 0.038). No statistical changes were found in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion The analysis showed that football training was safe in patients with skeletal metastatic prostate cancer and significantly improved quality of life. Larger analyses and/or trials are warranted to confirm the safety of exercise more broadly in cancer patients with skeletal metastatic disease.

KW - Soccer

KW - Cancer survivor

KW - Community

KW - Exercise

KW - Rehabilitation

U2 - 10.1186/s40798-021-00318-6

DO - 10.1186/s40798-021-00318-6

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33877496

VL - 7

JO - Sports Medicine - Open

JF - Sports Medicine - Open

SN - 2199-1170

IS - 1

M1 - 27

ER -

ID: 261271175