Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches : a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis. / Axelsen, M B; Boesen, M; Bliddal, H; Jacobsson, Lth; Hansen, M S; Østergaard, M.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, Bind 49, Nr. 2, 2020, s. 105-111.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Axelsen, MB, Boesen, M, Bliddal, H, Jacobsson, L, Hansen, MS & Østergaard, M 2020, 'Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis', Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, bind 49, nr. 2, s. 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2019.1639820

APA

Axelsen, M. B., Boesen, M., Bliddal, H., Jacobsson, L., Hansen, M. S., & Østergaard, M. (2020). Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 49(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2019.1639820

Vancouver

Axelsen MB, Boesen M, Bliddal H, Jacobsson L, Hansen MS, Østergaard M. Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 2020;49(2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2019.1639820

Author

Axelsen, M B ; Boesen, M ; Bliddal, H ; Jacobsson, Lth ; Hansen, M S ; Østergaard, M. / Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches : a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis. I: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 2020 ; Bind 49, Nr. 2. s. 105-111.

Bibtex

@article{96c0dcfe791143ebaca00cff344accda,
title = "Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis",
abstract = "Objective: The aim was to explore dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as an early marker of therapeutic response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP). Method: In 40 RA patients initiating CZP (27 patients) or 2 weeks of placebo (PCB) followed by CZP (13 patients), DCE-MRI of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints was performed at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. Using semi-automated software, three methods for drawing volume regions of interest (ROIs) in MCP2-5 and PIP2-5 were applied: 'Standard' (slices: all; joints: MCP2-5 together and PIP2-5 together), 'Detailed' (slices: slices with high-quality visualization; joints: as Standard), and 'Single-joint' (slices: as Detailed; joints: each joint separately). The number of enhancing voxels (Nvoxel), initial rate of enhancement (IRE), and maximum enhancement (ME) were extracted and analysed for each method. Results: Nvoxel in MCP2-5, and IRE and ME in PIP2-5 decreased statistically significantly (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.02-0.03) after 16 weeks of treatment for the Standard method. Nvoxel and ME decreased significantly more in the CZP group than in the PCB group after 1 week of treatment, but not at later time-points. There were no significant changes for DCE-MRI parameters for the Detailed and Single-joint methods. Conclusions: Certain DCE-MRI parameters detected decreased inflammation during CZP treatment in RA patients. Using specific criteria for ROIs, as in the Detailed and Single-joint methods, decreased the statistical power and could not show any changes over time.",
author = "Axelsen, {M B} and M Boesen and H Bliddal and Lth Jacobsson and Hansen, {M S} and M {\O}stergaard",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/03009742.2019.1639820",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "105--111",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology",
issn = "0300-9742",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsiveness of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging approaches

T2 - a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis

AU - Axelsen, M B

AU - Boesen, M

AU - Bliddal, H

AU - Jacobsson, Lth

AU - Hansen, M S

AU - Østergaard, M

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Objective: The aim was to explore dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as an early marker of therapeutic response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP). Method: In 40 RA patients initiating CZP (27 patients) or 2 weeks of placebo (PCB) followed by CZP (13 patients), DCE-MRI of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints was performed at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. Using semi-automated software, three methods for drawing volume regions of interest (ROIs) in MCP2-5 and PIP2-5 were applied: 'Standard' (slices: all; joints: MCP2-5 together and PIP2-5 together), 'Detailed' (slices: slices with high-quality visualization; joints: as Standard), and 'Single-joint' (slices: as Detailed; joints: each joint separately). The number of enhancing voxels (Nvoxel), initial rate of enhancement (IRE), and maximum enhancement (ME) were extracted and analysed for each method. Results: Nvoxel in MCP2-5, and IRE and ME in PIP2-5 decreased statistically significantly (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.02-0.03) after 16 weeks of treatment for the Standard method. Nvoxel and ME decreased significantly more in the CZP group than in the PCB group after 1 week of treatment, but not at later time-points. There were no significant changes for DCE-MRI parameters for the Detailed and Single-joint methods. Conclusions: Certain DCE-MRI parameters detected decreased inflammation during CZP treatment in RA patients. Using specific criteria for ROIs, as in the Detailed and Single-joint methods, decreased the statistical power and could not show any changes over time.

AB - Objective: The aim was to explore dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as an early marker of therapeutic response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP). Method: In 40 RA patients initiating CZP (27 patients) or 2 weeks of placebo (PCB) followed by CZP (13 patients), DCE-MRI of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints was performed at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. Using semi-automated software, three methods for drawing volume regions of interest (ROIs) in MCP2-5 and PIP2-5 were applied: 'Standard' (slices: all; joints: MCP2-5 together and PIP2-5 together), 'Detailed' (slices: slices with high-quality visualization; joints: as Standard), and 'Single-joint' (slices: as Detailed; joints: each joint separately). The number of enhancing voxels (Nvoxel), initial rate of enhancement (IRE), and maximum enhancement (ME) were extracted and analysed for each method. Results: Nvoxel in MCP2-5, and IRE and ME in PIP2-5 decreased statistically significantly (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.02-0.03) after 16 weeks of treatment for the Standard method. Nvoxel and ME decreased significantly more in the CZP group than in the PCB group after 1 week of treatment, but not at later time-points. There were no significant changes for DCE-MRI parameters for the Detailed and Single-joint methods. Conclusions: Certain DCE-MRI parameters detected decreased inflammation during CZP treatment in RA patients. Using specific criteria for ROIs, as in the Detailed and Single-joint methods, decreased the statistical power and could not show any changes over time.

U2 - 10.1080/03009742.2019.1639820

DO - 10.1080/03009742.2019.1639820

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31524046

VL - 49

SP - 105

EP - 111

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology

SN - 0300-9742

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 232975481