Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy : a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial. / Vejlgaard, Maja; Maibom, Sophia Liff; Joensen, Ulla Nordström; Thind, Peter Ole; Rohrsted, Malene; Aasvang, Eske Kvanner; Kehlet, Henrik; Røder, Martin Andreas.

I: World Journal of Urology, Bind 40, Nr. 7, 2022, s. 1669-1677.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Vejlgaard, M, Maibom, SL, Joensen, UN, Thind, PO, Rohrsted, M, Aasvang, EK, Kehlet, H & Røder, MA 2022, 'Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial', World Journal of Urology, bind 40, nr. 7, s. 1669-1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04029-9

APA

Vejlgaard, M., Maibom, S. L., Joensen, U. N., Thind, P. O., Rohrsted, M., Aasvang, E. K., Kehlet, H., & Røder, M. A. (2022). Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial. World Journal of Urology, 40(7), 1669-1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04029-9

Vancouver

Vejlgaard M, Maibom SL, Joensen UN, Thind PO, Rohrsted M, Aasvang EK o.a. Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial. World Journal of Urology. 2022;40(7):1669-1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04029-9

Author

Vejlgaard, Maja ; Maibom, Sophia Liff ; Joensen, Ulla Nordström ; Thind, Peter Ole ; Rohrsted, Malene ; Aasvang, Eske Kvanner ; Kehlet, Henrik ; Røder, Martin Andreas. / Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy : a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial. I: World Journal of Urology. 2022 ; Bind 40, Nr. 7. s. 1669-1677.

Bibtex

@article{e040d6239420499894833aaa5d7beeb4,
title = "Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aims to examine quality of life (QoL) before and after radical cystectomy (RC) and compare robot-assisted laparoscopy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Methods: This study is a predefined secondary analysis of a single-centre, double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to iRARC with ileal conduit (n = 25) or ORC with ileal conduit (n = 25). Patients were followed 90 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was patient-reported QoL using the EORTC Cancer-30 and muscle-invasive bladder cancer BLM-30 QoL questionnaires before and after RC. Differences between randomisation arms as well as changes over time were evaluated. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90 day complication rates, 90 day readmission rates, and 90 day days-alive-and-out-of-hospital and their relationship to QoL. Results: All patients underwent the allocated treatment. We found no difference in QoL, complication rates, readmission rates, and days-alive-and-out-of-hospital between randomisation arms. An overall improvement in QoL was found in the following domains: future perspectives, emotional functioning, and social functioning. Sexual functioning worsened postoperatively. There was no association between having experienced a major complication or lengthy hospitalisation and worse postoperative QoL. Conclusion: The QoL does not appear to depend on surgical technique. Apart from sexual functioning, patients report stable or improved QoL within the first 90 postoperative days.",
keywords = "Bladder cancer, Patient-reported outcomes, Quality of life, Radical cystectomy, Randomised controlled trial, Robotic surgery",
author = "Maja Vejlgaard and Maibom, {Sophia Liff} and Joensen, {Ulla Nordstr{\"o}m} and Thind, {Peter Ole} and Malene Rohrsted and Aasvang, {Eske Kvanner} and Henrik Kehlet and R{\o}der, {Martin Andreas}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1007/s00345-022-04029-9",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1669--1677",
journal = "World Journal of Urology",
issn = "0724-4983",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life and secondary outcomes for open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy

T2 - a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial

AU - Vejlgaard, Maja

AU - Maibom, Sophia Liff

AU - Joensen, Ulla Nordström

AU - Thind, Peter Ole

AU - Rohrsted, Malene

AU - Aasvang, Eske Kvanner

AU - Kehlet, Henrik

AU - Røder, Martin Andreas

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Purpose: This study aims to examine quality of life (QoL) before and after radical cystectomy (RC) and compare robot-assisted laparoscopy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Methods: This study is a predefined secondary analysis of a single-centre, double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to iRARC with ileal conduit (n = 25) or ORC with ileal conduit (n = 25). Patients were followed 90 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was patient-reported QoL using the EORTC Cancer-30 and muscle-invasive bladder cancer BLM-30 QoL questionnaires before and after RC. Differences between randomisation arms as well as changes over time were evaluated. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90 day complication rates, 90 day readmission rates, and 90 day days-alive-and-out-of-hospital and their relationship to QoL. Results: All patients underwent the allocated treatment. We found no difference in QoL, complication rates, readmission rates, and days-alive-and-out-of-hospital between randomisation arms. An overall improvement in QoL was found in the following domains: future perspectives, emotional functioning, and social functioning. Sexual functioning worsened postoperatively. There was no association between having experienced a major complication or lengthy hospitalisation and worse postoperative QoL. Conclusion: The QoL does not appear to depend on surgical technique. Apart from sexual functioning, patients report stable or improved QoL within the first 90 postoperative days.

AB - Purpose: This study aims to examine quality of life (QoL) before and after radical cystectomy (RC) and compare robot-assisted laparoscopy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Methods: This study is a predefined secondary analysis of a single-centre, double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to iRARC with ileal conduit (n = 25) or ORC with ileal conduit (n = 25). Patients were followed 90 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was patient-reported QoL using the EORTC Cancer-30 and muscle-invasive bladder cancer BLM-30 QoL questionnaires before and after RC. Differences between randomisation arms as well as changes over time were evaluated. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90 day complication rates, 90 day readmission rates, and 90 day days-alive-and-out-of-hospital and their relationship to QoL. Results: All patients underwent the allocated treatment. We found no difference in QoL, complication rates, readmission rates, and days-alive-and-out-of-hospital between randomisation arms. An overall improvement in QoL was found in the following domains: future perspectives, emotional functioning, and social functioning. Sexual functioning worsened postoperatively. There was no association between having experienced a major complication or lengthy hospitalisation and worse postoperative QoL. Conclusion: The QoL does not appear to depend on surgical technique. Apart from sexual functioning, patients report stable or improved QoL within the first 90 postoperative days.

KW - Bladder cancer

KW - Patient-reported outcomes

KW - Quality of life

KW - Radical cystectomy

KW - Randomised controlled trial

KW - Robotic surgery

U2 - 10.1007/s00345-022-04029-9

DO - 10.1007/s00345-022-04029-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35590011

AN - SCOPUS:85130475232

VL - 40

SP - 1669

EP - 1677

JO - World Journal of Urology

JF - World Journal of Urology

SN - 0724-4983

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 315475989