Prevalences of comorbid anxiety disorder and daily smartphone-based self-reported anxiety in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Background Around 40% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) additionally have anxiety disorder. The prevalence of anxiety in patients with newly diagnosed BD and their first-degree relatives (UR) has not been investigated. Objective To investigate (1) the prevalence of a comorbid anxiety diagnosis in patients with newly diagnosed BD and their UR, (2) sociodemographic and clinical differences between patients with and without a comorbid anxiety diagnosis and (3) the association between smartphone-based patient-reported anxiety and observer-based ratings of anxiety and functioning, respectively. Methods We recruited 372 patients with BD and 116 of their UR. Daily smartphone-based data were provided from 125 patients. SCAN was used to assess comorbid anxiety diagnoses. Findings In patients with BD, the prevalence of a comorbid anxiety disorder was 11.3% (N=42) and 10.3% and 5.9% in partial and full remission, respectively. In UR, the prevalence was 6.9%. Patients with a comorbid anxiety disorder had longer illness duration (p=0.016) and higher number of affective episodes (p=0.011). Smartphone-based patient-reported anxiety symptoms were associated with ratings of anxiety and impaired functioning (p<0.001). Limitations The SCAN interviews to diagnose comorbid anxiety disorder were carried out regardless of the participants' mood state. Clinical implications The lower prevalence of anxiety in newly diagnosed BD than in later stages of BD indicates that anxiety increases with progression of BD. Comorbid anxiety seems associated with poorer clinical outcomes and functioning and smartphones are clinically useful for monitoring anxiety symptoms. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02888262).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEvidence-Based Mental Health
Vol/bind24
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)137-144
Antal sider8
ISSN1362-0347
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Funding The study was funded by grants from the Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Council for Independent Research, Medical Sciences (DFF–4183–00570), Weimans Fund, Markedmodningsfonden (the market development fund, 2015-310), Gangstedfonden (A29594), Helsefonden (16-B-0063), Innovation Fund Denmark (the Innovation Fund, Denmark, 5164-00001B), Copenhagen Center for Health Technology, EU H2020 ITN (EU project 722561), Augustinusfonden (16-0083) and Lundbeck Foundation (R215-2015-4121).

Funding Information:
The study was funded by grants from the Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Council for Independent Research, Medical Sciences (DFF-4183-00570), Weimans Fund, Markedmodningsfonden (the market development fund, 2015-310), Gangstedfonden (A29594), Helsefonden (16-B-0063), Innovation Fund Denmark (the Innovation Fund, Denmark, 5164-00001B), Copenhagen Center for Health Technology, EU H2020 ITN (EU project 722561), Augustinusfonden (16-0083) and Lundbeck Foundation (R215-2015-4121)

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

ID: 302375399