Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings. / Aminu, Olubunmi R.; Lembo, Tiziana; Zadoks, Ruth N.; Biek, Roman; Lewis, Suzanna; Kiwelu, Ireen; Mmbaga, Blandina T.; Mshanga, Deogratius; Shirima, Gabriel; Denwood, Matt; Forde, Taya L.

I: P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases, Bind 14, Nr. 9, e0008655, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Aminu, OR, Lembo, T, Zadoks, RN, Biek, R, Lewis, S, Kiwelu, I, Mmbaga, BT, Mshanga, D, Shirima, G, Denwood, M & Forde, TL 2020, 'Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings', P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases, bind 14, nr. 9, e0008655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655

APA

Aminu, O. R., Lembo, T., Zadoks, R. N., Biek, R., Lewis, S., Kiwelu, I., Mmbaga, B. T., Mshanga, D., Shirima, G., Denwood, M., & Forde, T. L. (2020). Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings. P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases, 14(9), [e0008655]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655

Vancouver

Aminu OR, Lembo T, Zadoks RN, Biek R, Lewis S, Kiwelu I o.a. Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings. P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020;14(9). e0008655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655

Author

Aminu, Olubunmi R. ; Lembo, Tiziana ; Zadoks, Ruth N. ; Biek, Roman ; Lewis, Suzanna ; Kiwelu, Ireen ; Mmbaga, Blandina T. ; Mshanga, Deogratius ; Shirima, Gabriel ; Denwood, Matt ; Forde, Taya L. / Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings. I: P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020 ; Bind 14, Nr. 9.

Bibtex

@article{014b014ec46e49b3a2670dd32f458063,
title = "Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings",
abstract = "Anthrax threatens human and animal health, and people's livelihoods in many rural communities in Africa and Asia. In these areas, anthrax surveillance is challenged by a lack of tools for on-site detection. Furthermore, cultural practices and infrastructure may affect sample availability and quality. Practical yet accurate diagnostic solutions are greatly needed to quantify anthrax impacts. We validated microscopic and molecular methods for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in field-collected blood smears and identified alternative samples suitable for anthrax confirmation in the absence of blood smears. We investigated livestock mortalities suspected to be caused by anthrax in northern Tanzania. Field-prepared blood smears (n = 152) were tested by microscopy using four staining techniques as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Bayesian latent class analysis. Median sensitivity (91%, CI 95% [84-96%]) and specificity (99%, CI 95% [96-100%]) of microscopy using azure B were comparable to those of the recommended standard, polychrome methylene blue, PMB (92%, CI 95% [84-97%] and 98%, CI 95% [95-100%], respectively), but azure B is more available and convenient. Other commonly-used stains performed poorly. Blood smears could be obtained for <50% of suspected anthrax cases due to local customs and conditions. However, PCR on DNA extracts from skin, which was almost always available, had high sensitivity and specificity (95%, CI 95% [90-98%] and 95%, CI 95% [87-99%], respectively), even after extended storage at ambient temperature. Azure B microscopy represents an accurate diagnostic test for animal anthrax that can be performed with basic laboratory infrastructure and in the field. When blood smears are unavailable, PCR using skin tissues provides a valuable alternative for confirmation. Our findings lead to a practical diagnostic approach for anthrax in low-resource settings that can support surveillance and control efforts for anthrax-endemic countries globally.",
author = "Aminu, {Olubunmi R.} and Tiziana Lembo and Zadoks, {Ruth N.} and Roman Biek and Suzanna Lewis and Ireen Kiwelu and Mmbaga, {Blandina T.} and Deogratius Mshanga and Gabriel Shirima and Matt Denwood and Forde, {Taya L.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases (Online)",
issn = "1935-2735",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings

AU - Aminu, Olubunmi R.

AU - Lembo, Tiziana

AU - Zadoks, Ruth N.

AU - Biek, Roman

AU - Lewis, Suzanna

AU - Kiwelu, Ireen

AU - Mmbaga, Blandina T.

AU - Mshanga, Deogratius

AU - Shirima, Gabriel

AU - Denwood, Matt

AU - Forde, Taya L.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Anthrax threatens human and animal health, and people's livelihoods in many rural communities in Africa and Asia. In these areas, anthrax surveillance is challenged by a lack of tools for on-site detection. Furthermore, cultural practices and infrastructure may affect sample availability and quality. Practical yet accurate diagnostic solutions are greatly needed to quantify anthrax impacts. We validated microscopic and molecular methods for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in field-collected blood smears and identified alternative samples suitable for anthrax confirmation in the absence of blood smears. We investigated livestock mortalities suspected to be caused by anthrax in northern Tanzania. Field-prepared blood smears (n = 152) were tested by microscopy using four staining techniques as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Bayesian latent class analysis. Median sensitivity (91%, CI 95% [84-96%]) and specificity (99%, CI 95% [96-100%]) of microscopy using azure B were comparable to those of the recommended standard, polychrome methylene blue, PMB (92%, CI 95% [84-97%] and 98%, CI 95% [95-100%], respectively), but azure B is more available and convenient. Other commonly-used stains performed poorly. Blood smears could be obtained for <50% of suspected anthrax cases due to local customs and conditions. However, PCR on DNA extracts from skin, which was almost always available, had high sensitivity and specificity (95%, CI 95% [90-98%] and 95%, CI 95% [87-99%], respectively), even after extended storage at ambient temperature. Azure B microscopy represents an accurate diagnostic test for animal anthrax that can be performed with basic laboratory infrastructure and in the field. When blood smears are unavailable, PCR using skin tissues provides a valuable alternative for confirmation. Our findings lead to a practical diagnostic approach for anthrax in low-resource settings that can support surveillance and control efforts for anthrax-endemic countries globally.

AB - Anthrax threatens human and animal health, and people's livelihoods in many rural communities in Africa and Asia. In these areas, anthrax surveillance is challenged by a lack of tools for on-site detection. Furthermore, cultural practices and infrastructure may affect sample availability and quality. Practical yet accurate diagnostic solutions are greatly needed to quantify anthrax impacts. We validated microscopic and molecular methods for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in field-collected blood smears and identified alternative samples suitable for anthrax confirmation in the absence of blood smears. We investigated livestock mortalities suspected to be caused by anthrax in northern Tanzania. Field-prepared blood smears (n = 152) were tested by microscopy using four staining techniques as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Bayesian latent class analysis. Median sensitivity (91%, CI 95% [84-96%]) and specificity (99%, CI 95% [96-100%]) of microscopy using azure B were comparable to those of the recommended standard, polychrome methylene blue, PMB (92%, CI 95% [84-97%] and 98%, CI 95% [95-100%], respectively), but azure B is more available and convenient. Other commonly-used stains performed poorly. Blood smears could be obtained for <50% of suspected anthrax cases due to local customs and conditions. However, PCR on DNA extracts from skin, which was almost always available, had high sensitivity and specificity (95%, CI 95% [90-98%] and 95%, CI 95% [87-99%], respectively), even after extended storage at ambient temperature. Azure B microscopy represents an accurate diagnostic test for animal anthrax that can be performed with basic laboratory infrastructure and in the field. When blood smears are unavailable, PCR using skin tissues provides a valuable alternative for confirmation. Our findings lead to a practical diagnostic approach for anthrax in low-resource settings that can support surveillance and control efforts for anthrax-endemic countries globally.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655

DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32925904

AN - SCOPUS:85091653304

VL - 14

JO - P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases (Online)

JF - P L o S Neglected Tropical Diseases (Online)

SN - 1935-2735

IS - 9

M1 - e0008655

ER -

ID: 249426307