Phylogenomic analyses of the genus Drosophila reveals genomic signals of climate adaptation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,67 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Fang Li
  • Rahul V. Rane
  • Victor Luria
  • Zijun Xiong
  • Jiawei Chen
  • Zimai Li
  • Renee A. Catullo
  • Philippa C. Griffin
  • Michele Schiffer
  • Stephen Pearce
  • Siu Fai Lee
  • Kerensa McElroy
  • Ann Stocker
  • Jennifer Shirriffs
  • Fiona Cockerell
  • Chris Coppin
  • Carla M. Sgrò
  • Amir Karger
  • John W. Cain
  • Jessica A. Weber
  • Gabriel Santpere
  • Marc W. Kirschner
  • Ary A. Hoffmann
  • John G. Oakeshott

Many Drosophila species differ widely in their distributions and climate niches, making them excellent subjects for evolutionary genomic studies. Here, we have developed a database of high-quality assemblies for 46 Drosophila species and one closely related Zaprionus. Fifteen of the genomes were newly sequenced, and 20 were improved with additional sequencing. New or improved annotations were generated for all 47 species, assisted by new transcriptomes for 19. Phylogenomic analyses of these data resolved several previously ambiguous relationships, especially in the melanogaster species group. However, it also revealed significant phylogenetic incongruence among genes, mainly in the form of incomplete lineage sorting in the subgenus Sophophora but also including asymmetric introgression in the subgenus Drosophila. Using the phylogeny as a framework and taking into account these incongruences, we then screened the data for genome-wide signals of adaptation to different climatic niches. First, phylostratigraphy revealed relatively high rates of recent novel gene gain in three temperate pseudoobscura and five desert-adapted cactophilic mulleri subgroup species. Second, we found differing ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions in several hundred orthologues between climate generalists and specialists, with significant higher trends for those in tropical and lower trends for those in temperate-continental specialists respectively than those in the climate generalists. Finally, resequencing natural populations of 13 species revealed tropics-restricted species generally had smaller population sizes, lower genome diversity and more deleterious mutations than the more widespread species. We conclude that adaptation to different climates in the genus Drosophila has been associated with large-scale and multifaceted genomic changes.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftMolecular Ecology Resources
Vol/bind22
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1559-1581
Antal sider23
ISSN1755-098X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We thank Madeleine Gane and Mark Schutze for assistance in species collection and inbreeding programs, Lea Rako and Kelly Richardson for assistance with stock maintenance and inbreeding, Lars Jermiin for advice on the phylogenomics and Shane McEvey for help in accessing collection records for the niche calculations. We are also grateful for the insights of three anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this manuscript. The work was supported by Australia’s Science and Industry Endowment Fund and the Australian Research Council and their Laureate Fellowship Scheme. This work was also supported by Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB31020000), International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 152453KYSB20170002), Carlsberg foundation (CF16‐0663), Villum Foundation (No. 25900) to G.Z. The project that gave rise to some of the results received the support of a fellowship from “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434, to G.S.). The fellowship code is LCF/BQ/PI19/11690010. G.S. is also supported by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain (PID2019‐104700GA‐I00). V.L. and M.W.K. acknowledge funding support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH grants R01 HD073104 and R01 HD091846, to M.W.K.). V.L. thanks Anne O’Donnell‐Luria for discussions and also for support from the William Randolph Hearst Fund Award and a Boston Children’s Hospital Career Development Fellowship (to A.O.L.).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 287072895