Bibliografisk note

This commentary is based on, Jørgen Blomqvist, Morten Rosenmeier and Jens Schovsbo, “‘Ej blot til lyst’ – parodiprincippet i dansk ophavsret”, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2023 – forthcoming), which contains extensive discussions and detailed references to Scandinavian judgments and literature. We focus on the copyright law aspects of the case, but it also involved the use of the Marketing Practices Act (which was denied).