Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry. / Garder, I. M.; Gómez-Muñoz, B.; Stoumann Jensen, L.; Regueiro, I.

I: Waste Management, Bind 166, 2023, s. 86-95.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Garder, IM, Gómez-Muñoz, B, Stoumann Jensen, L & Regueiro, I 2023, 'Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry', Waste Management, bind 166, s. 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.050

APA

Garder, I. M., Gómez-Muñoz, B., Stoumann Jensen, L., & Regueiro, I. (2023). Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry. Waste Management, 166, 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.050

Vancouver

Garder IM, Gómez-Muñoz B, Stoumann Jensen L, Regueiro I. Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry. Waste Management. 2023;166:86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.050

Author

Garder, I. M. ; Gómez-Muñoz, B. ; Stoumann Jensen, L. ; Regueiro, I. / Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry. I: Waste Management. 2023 ; Bind 166. s. 86-95.

Bibtex

@article{83a4ea1ae9cf41e6aefa3580dfa27eaf,
title = "Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry",
abstract = "Bioacidification of animal slurry has proven to be a good alternative to traditional acidification with sulfuric acid for reducing ammonia emissions. However, the fertiliser value of the bioacidified slurry is yet to be determined before a whole-system assessment can be made. The N fertiliser value of pig slurry either untreated or bioacidified with glucose and/or fermented brown juice (BJ) was investigated in a pot experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) grown in a greenhouse. The slurry treatments were either pre-acidified with sulfuric acid to pH 6.5 or 5.5 before bioacidification, or bioacidified without pre-acidification. Plant growth was good in all treatments, but the bioacidified treatments showed a lower mineral fertiliser equivalence (MFE) value than the non-bioacidified treatments. Average MFE values were 71 %, 62 %, 59 % and 41 % for the non-bioacidified (noC), glucose (glu), glucose and brown juice (glu + BJ20) and brown juice (BJ50) treatments respectively. This reduction was most likely caused by immobilisation of N due to the addition of easily available C from the substrates. The fertiliser value was not affected by the pH, C/N ratio and C content of the treatments, while a positive correlation was found with NH4 + -N content. Pre-acidification positively affected MFE, probably due to higher nutrient availability. Further studies on the effect of different inclusion rates of substrates for bioacidification and the effect of application method on the fertiliser value, as well as studies under field conditions, are needed before recommendations can be made about bioacidification as an alternative to traditional acidification.",
author = "Garder, {I. M.} and B. G{\'o}mez-Mu{\~n}oz and {Stoumann Jensen}, L. and I. Regueiro",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s)",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.050",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "86--95",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nitrogen fertiliser value of bioacidified slurry

AU - Garder, I. M.

AU - Gómez-Muñoz, B.

AU - Stoumann Jensen, L.

AU - Regueiro, I.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Bioacidification of animal slurry has proven to be a good alternative to traditional acidification with sulfuric acid for reducing ammonia emissions. However, the fertiliser value of the bioacidified slurry is yet to be determined before a whole-system assessment can be made. The N fertiliser value of pig slurry either untreated or bioacidified with glucose and/or fermented brown juice (BJ) was investigated in a pot experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) grown in a greenhouse. The slurry treatments were either pre-acidified with sulfuric acid to pH 6.5 or 5.5 before bioacidification, or bioacidified without pre-acidification. Plant growth was good in all treatments, but the bioacidified treatments showed a lower mineral fertiliser equivalence (MFE) value than the non-bioacidified treatments. Average MFE values were 71 %, 62 %, 59 % and 41 % for the non-bioacidified (noC), glucose (glu), glucose and brown juice (glu + BJ20) and brown juice (BJ50) treatments respectively. This reduction was most likely caused by immobilisation of N due to the addition of easily available C from the substrates. The fertiliser value was not affected by the pH, C/N ratio and C content of the treatments, while a positive correlation was found with NH4 + -N content. Pre-acidification positively affected MFE, probably due to higher nutrient availability. Further studies on the effect of different inclusion rates of substrates for bioacidification and the effect of application method on the fertiliser value, as well as studies under field conditions, are needed before recommendations can be made about bioacidification as an alternative to traditional acidification.

AB - Bioacidification of animal slurry has proven to be a good alternative to traditional acidification with sulfuric acid for reducing ammonia emissions. However, the fertiliser value of the bioacidified slurry is yet to be determined before a whole-system assessment can be made. The N fertiliser value of pig slurry either untreated or bioacidified with glucose and/or fermented brown juice (BJ) was investigated in a pot experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) grown in a greenhouse. The slurry treatments were either pre-acidified with sulfuric acid to pH 6.5 or 5.5 before bioacidification, or bioacidified without pre-acidification. Plant growth was good in all treatments, but the bioacidified treatments showed a lower mineral fertiliser equivalence (MFE) value than the non-bioacidified treatments. Average MFE values were 71 %, 62 %, 59 % and 41 % for the non-bioacidified (noC), glucose (glu), glucose and brown juice (glu + BJ20) and brown juice (BJ50) treatments respectively. This reduction was most likely caused by immobilisation of N due to the addition of easily available C from the substrates. The fertiliser value was not affected by the pH, C/N ratio and C content of the treatments, while a positive correlation was found with NH4 + -N content. Pre-acidification positively affected MFE, probably due to higher nutrient availability. Further studies on the effect of different inclusion rates of substrates for bioacidification and the effect of application method on the fertiliser value, as well as studies under field conditions, are needed before recommendations can be made about bioacidification as an alternative to traditional acidification.

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.050

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.050

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37163971

AN - SCOPUS:85158030320

VL - 166

SP - 86

EP - 95

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

ER -

ID: 357732360