Myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with chronic hepatitis C before and after direct-acting antiviral treatment—a pilot study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 518 KB, PDF-dokument

Introduction: Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease which may be due to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction caused by the chronic infection. In this prospective pilot study, we assessed, for the first time among patients with CHC the myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) by Rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) before and after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment and compared them with biomarkers of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Methods: We included 10 patients with CHC who received 8 or 12 weeks of DAA treatment. To obtain the MPR, a cardiac 82Rb PET/CT scan at rest and adenosine-induced stress was performed at baseline and between 12 and 24 weeks post DAA treatment. Additionally, markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after DAA treatment. Results: All 10 patients achieved cure and the median age was 50 (range: 40–62 years). The median MPR before treatment was 3.1 (range: 2.3–4.8) compared to 2.9 (range: 2.2–4.1) after DAA treatment p = 0.63. Also, cure after DAA treatment was not associated with an overall significant decrease in markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. Discussion: Cure after DAA treatment in patients with CHC did not improve coronary microvascular function nor did it lead to a decrease in soluble markers of cardiovascular risk in the given time frame where the patients were followed. It should be noted, that MPR before DAA treatment was in the normal range. Considering the small sample size and short follow-up time, further studies are warranted to determine if viral clearance has an effect on coronary microvascular function and endothelial dysfunction.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Vol/bind42
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)389-395
ISSN1475-0961
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We thank all the participants for their contribution to this study. We would also like to thank technician Katrine Qvist at Cluster for Molecular Imaging, University of Copenhagen for analysis of biomarkers and the staff at the Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, for their skilful assistance. This study was supported by grants from The Capital Region of Denmark's Research Foundation (C. S; 2020‐A6936) and Hvidovre Hospital Research Foundation (C. S). All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.

ID: 321836974