Limb girdle muscular dystrophies: classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Limb girdle muscular dystrophies : classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies. / Vissing, John.

I: Current Opinion in Neurology, Bind 29, Nr. 5, 10.2016, s. 635-641.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Vissing, J 2016, 'Limb girdle muscular dystrophies: classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies', Current Opinion in Neurology, bind 29, nr. 5, s. 635-641. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000375

APA

Vissing, J. (2016). Limb girdle muscular dystrophies: classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies. Current Opinion in Neurology, 29(5), 635-641. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000375

Vancouver

Vissing J. Limb girdle muscular dystrophies: classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2016 okt.;29(5):635-641. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000375

Author

Vissing, John. / Limb girdle muscular dystrophies : classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies. I: Current Opinion in Neurology. 2016 ; Bind 29, Nr. 5. s. 635-641.

Bibtex

@article{fc035d4543814f1dac1dc8d8c15e1eca,
title = "Limb girdle muscular dystrophies: classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical spectrum of limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs), the pitfalls of the current classification system for LGMDs, and emerging therapies for these conditions.RECENT FINDINGS: Close to half of all LGMD subtypes have been discovered within the last 6 years of the 21-year-period in which the current classification system for LGMD has existed. The number of letters for annotation of new recessive LGMD conditions is exhausted, and multiple already classified LGMDs do not strictly fulfill diagnostic criteria for LGMD or are registered in other classification systems for muscle disease. On the contrary, diseases that fulfill classical criteria for LGMD have found no place in the LGMD classification system. These shortcomings call for revision/creation of a new classification system for LGMD. The rapidly expanding gene sequencing capabilities have helped to speed up new LGMD discoveries, and unveiled pheno-/genotype relations. Parallel to this progress in identifying new LGMD subtypes, emerging therapies for LGMDs are under way, but no disease-specific treatment is yet available for nonexperimental use.SUMMARY: The field of LGMD is rapidly developing from a diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoint, but a uniform and universally agreed classification system for LGMDs is needed.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "John Vissing",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1097/WCO.0000000000000375",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "635--641",
journal = "Current Opinion in Neurology",
issn = "1350-7540",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limb girdle muscular dystrophies

T2 - classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies

AU - Vissing, John

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical spectrum of limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs), the pitfalls of the current classification system for LGMDs, and emerging therapies for these conditions.RECENT FINDINGS: Close to half of all LGMD subtypes have been discovered within the last 6 years of the 21-year-period in which the current classification system for LGMD has existed. The number of letters for annotation of new recessive LGMD conditions is exhausted, and multiple already classified LGMDs do not strictly fulfill diagnostic criteria for LGMD or are registered in other classification systems for muscle disease. On the contrary, diseases that fulfill classical criteria for LGMD have found no place in the LGMD classification system. These shortcomings call for revision/creation of a new classification system for LGMD. The rapidly expanding gene sequencing capabilities have helped to speed up new LGMD discoveries, and unveiled pheno-/genotype relations. Parallel to this progress in identifying new LGMD subtypes, emerging therapies for LGMDs are under way, but no disease-specific treatment is yet available for nonexperimental use.SUMMARY: The field of LGMD is rapidly developing from a diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoint, but a uniform and universally agreed classification system for LGMDs is needed.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical spectrum of limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs), the pitfalls of the current classification system for LGMDs, and emerging therapies for these conditions.RECENT FINDINGS: Close to half of all LGMD subtypes have been discovered within the last 6 years of the 21-year-period in which the current classification system for LGMD has existed. The number of letters for annotation of new recessive LGMD conditions is exhausted, and multiple already classified LGMDs do not strictly fulfill diagnostic criteria for LGMD or are registered in other classification systems for muscle disease. On the contrary, diseases that fulfill classical criteria for LGMD have found no place in the LGMD classification system. These shortcomings call for revision/creation of a new classification system for LGMD. The rapidly expanding gene sequencing capabilities have helped to speed up new LGMD discoveries, and unveiled pheno-/genotype relations. Parallel to this progress in identifying new LGMD subtypes, emerging therapies for LGMDs are under way, but no disease-specific treatment is yet available for nonexperimental use.SUMMARY: The field of LGMD is rapidly developing from a diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoint, but a uniform and universally agreed classification system for LGMDs is needed.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000375

DO - 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000375

M3 - Review

C2 - 27490667

VL - 29

SP - 635

EP - 641

JO - Current Opinion in Neurology

JF - Current Opinion in Neurology

SN - 1350-7540

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 174861190