Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery: a Delphi study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery : a Delphi study. / Møller, Louise; Hertz, Peter; Grande, Ulla; Aukdal, Janne; Fredensborg, Britt; Kristensen, Helle; Petersson, Jane; Konge, Lars; Bjerrum, Flemming.

I: Surgical Endoscopy, Bind 37, 2023, s. 2729–2748.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Møller, L, Hertz, P, Grande, U, Aukdal, J, Fredensborg, B, Kristensen, H, Petersson, J, Konge, L & Bjerrum, F 2023, 'Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery: a Delphi study', Surgical Endoscopy, bind 37, s. 2729–2748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09751-4

APA

Møller, L., Hertz, P., Grande, U., Aukdal, J., Fredensborg, B., Kristensen, H., Petersson, J., Konge, L., & Bjerrum, F. (2023). Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery: a Delphi study. Surgical Endoscopy, 37, 2729–2748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09751-4

Vancouver

Møller L, Hertz P, Grande U, Aukdal J, Fredensborg B, Kristensen H o.a. Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery: a Delphi study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2023;37:2729–2748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09751-4

Author

Møller, Louise ; Hertz, Peter ; Grande, Ulla ; Aukdal, Janne ; Fredensborg, Britt ; Kristensen, Helle ; Petersson, Jane ; Konge, Lars ; Bjerrum, Flemming. / Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery : a Delphi study. I: Surgical Endoscopy. 2023 ; Bind 37. s. 2729–2748.

Bibtex

@article{ad42838718d5493fa6e977c63816965c,
title = "Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery: a Delphi study",
abstract = "Background: Currently, no generally accepted curriculum for operating room nurses (OR nurses) working with robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) exists. OR nurses working with RAS require different competencies than regular OR nurses, e.g. knowledge of the robotic system and equipment and specific emergency undocking procedures. The objective of this study was to identify learning goals for a curriculum for OR nurses working with RAS and to investigate which learning methods should be used. Methods: A three-round Delphi approach, with an additional survey, was used in this study. Four OR nurses from every department in gynecology, urology, and surgical gastroenterology doing RAS in Denmark were invited to participate. Results: The response rates were 93%, 81%, and 79%, respectively, in the three rounds of the Delphi survey and 68% in the additional survey. After the processing of data, a list of 57 learning goals, sorted under 11 domains, was produced. 41 learning goals were rated Relevant, Very relevant, or Essential spread over 10 of the 11 domains. The top 3 learning goals rated as Essential: Identify the most common injuries related to patient positioning during robotic-assisted surgery and know how to avoid them, Connect, calibrate and handle the scope, Perform an emergency undocking procedure. The panel rated Supervised training during surgery on patients as the most relevant learning method, followed by Dry lab and Team training. Conclusions: The learning goals identified in this study, can be used as the basis for a curriculum for OR nurses working with RAS. During the processing, it became clear that there is a need to further investigate issues such as communication challenges, awareness of emergency procedures, and differences in the skills required depending on the role of the RAS nurse.",
keywords = "Curriculum development, Delphi, Education, Nurse, Robotic-assisted surgery",
author = "Louise M{\o}ller and Peter Hertz and Ulla Grande and Janne Aukdal and Britt Fredensborg and Helle Kristensen and Jane Petersson and Lars Konge and Flemming Bjerrum",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-022-09751-4",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "2729–2748",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery

T2 - a Delphi study

AU - Møller, Louise

AU - Hertz, Peter

AU - Grande, Ulla

AU - Aukdal, Janne

AU - Fredensborg, Britt

AU - Kristensen, Helle

AU - Petersson, Jane

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Bjerrum, Flemming

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: Currently, no generally accepted curriculum for operating room nurses (OR nurses) working with robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) exists. OR nurses working with RAS require different competencies than regular OR nurses, e.g. knowledge of the robotic system and equipment and specific emergency undocking procedures. The objective of this study was to identify learning goals for a curriculum for OR nurses working with RAS and to investigate which learning methods should be used. Methods: A three-round Delphi approach, with an additional survey, was used in this study. Four OR nurses from every department in gynecology, urology, and surgical gastroenterology doing RAS in Denmark were invited to participate. Results: The response rates were 93%, 81%, and 79%, respectively, in the three rounds of the Delphi survey and 68% in the additional survey. After the processing of data, a list of 57 learning goals, sorted under 11 domains, was produced. 41 learning goals were rated Relevant, Very relevant, or Essential spread over 10 of the 11 domains. The top 3 learning goals rated as Essential: Identify the most common injuries related to patient positioning during robotic-assisted surgery and know how to avoid them, Connect, calibrate and handle the scope, Perform an emergency undocking procedure. The panel rated Supervised training during surgery on patients as the most relevant learning method, followed by Dry lab and Team training. Conclusions: The learning goals identified in this study, can be used as the basis for a curriculum for OR nurses working with RAS. During the processing, it became clear that there is a need to further investigate issues such as communication challenges, awareness of emergency procedures, and differences in the skills required depending on the role of the RAS nurse.

AB - Background: Currently, no generally accepted curriculum for operating room nurses (OR nurses) working with robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) exists. OR nurses working with RAS require different competencies than regular OR nurses, e.g. knowledge of the robotic system and equipment and specific emergency undocking procedures. The objective of this study was to identify learning goals for a curriculum for OR nurses working with RAS and to investigate which learning methods should be used. Methods: A three-round Delphi approach, with an additional survey, was used in this study. Four OR nurses from every department in gynecology, urology, and surgical gastroenterology doing RAS in Denmark were invited to participate. Results: The response rates were 93%, 81%, and 79%, respectively, in the three rounds of the Delphi survey and 68% in the additional survey. After the processing of data, a list of 57 learning goals, sorted under 11 domains, was produced. 41 learning goals were rated Relevant, Very relevant, or Essential spread over 10 of the 11 domains. The top 3 learning goals rated as Essential: Identify the most common injuries related to patient positioning during robotic-assisted surgery and know how to avoid them, Connect, calibrate and handle the scope, Perform an emergency undocking procedure. The panel rated Supervised training during surgery on patients as the most relevant learning method, followed by Dry lab and Team training. Conclusions: The learning goals identified in this study, can be used as the basis for a curriculum for OR nurses working with RAS. During the processing, it became clear that there is a need to further investigate issues such as communication challenges, awareness of emergency procedures, and differences in the skills required depending on the role of the RAS nurse.

KW - Curriculum development

KW - Delphi

KW - Education

KW - Nurse

KW - Robotic-assisted surgery

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-022-09751-4

DO - 10.1007/s00464-022-09751-4

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36471061

AN - SCOPUS:85143339312

VL - 37

SP - 2729

EP - 2748

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

ER -

ID: 340886593