From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Standard

From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis. / Bech, P; Christensen, E M; Vinberg, M; Bech-Andersen, G; Kessing, L V; Bech-Andersen, Gabriele.

I: Journal of Affective Disorders, Bind 132, 22.02.2011, s. 48-54.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Harvard

Bech, P, Christensen, EM, Vinberg, M, Bech-Andersen, G, Kessing, LV & Bech-Andersen, G 2011, 'From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis', Journal of Affective Disorders, bind 132, s. 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017

APA

Bech, P., Christensen, E. M., Vinberg, M., Bech-Andersen, G., Kessing, L. V., & Bech-Andersen, G. (2011). From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 132, 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017

Vancouver

Bech P, Christensen EM, Vinberg M, Bech-Andersen G, Kessing LV, Bech-Andersen G. From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2011 feb. 22;132:48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017

Author

Bech, P ; Christensen, E M ; Vinberg, M ; Bech-Andersen, G ; Kessing, L V ; Bech-Andersen, Gabriele. / From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis. I: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2011 ; Bind 132. s. 48-54.

Bibtex

@article{c14a2a2036674de29efd5ef326c80ed3,
title = "From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) was developed to identify subthreshold bipolarity in patients with major depression. An HCL-32 version with fewer items has been suggested. METHODS: Principal component analysis (PCA) without rotation was used to identify active/elevated mood versus risk-taking/irritable behaviour in the HCL-32. Using the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale as index of clinical validity a shorter version was developed. Item response theory analysis was used to evaluate whether the total score of the HCL-32 was sufficient to measure subthreshold bipolarity. The short 13-item Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) was used for comparison. RESULTS: In accordance with the SCID-II criteria, we included 59 bipolar I and 63 unipolar (depressed) outpatients who had recently been discharged from inpatient treatment. In the HCL-32, PCA identified the two contrasting factors: active/elevated mood versus risk-taking/irritable behaviour. The clinical validation analysis focussed on 20 HCL items as the most acceptable (HCL-20). Item response analysis accepted that the total scores of the HCL-32/HCL-20 were a sufficient statistic, as was the total score of the MDQ. Among the unipolar (depressed) patients not responding to their antidepressive medication, subtreshold bipolarity was identified in 55% of patients using the HCL-20, 36% using the HCL-32, but only 18% using the MDQ. LIMITATIONS: Only outpatients recently discharged from inpatient treatment were studied. A further limitation is that 9.5% of the unipolar patients had only suffered from one episode, which, however had led to hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: The HCL-20 was found to identify subthreshold bipolarity in up to 55% of inpatients with major depressive disorder not responding to antidepressive medication.",
author = "P Bech and Christensen, {E M} and M Vinberg and G Bech-Andersen and Kessing, {L V} and Gabriele Bech-Andersen",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2011",
month = feb,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "48--54",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From items to syndromes in the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): Psychometric validation and clinical validity analysis

AU - Bech, P

AU - Christensen, E M

AU - Vinberg, M

AU - Bech-Andersen, G

AU - Kessing, L V

AU - Bech-Andersen, Gabriele

N1 - Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2011/2/22

Y1 - 2011/2/22

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) was developed to identify subthreshold bipolarity in patients with major depression. An HCL-32 version with fewer items has been suggested. METHODS: Principal component analysis (PCA) without rotation was used to identify active/elevated mood versus risk-taking/irritable behaviour in the HCL-32. Using the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale as index of clinical validity a shorter version was developed. Item response theory analysis was used to evaluate whether the total score of the HCL-32 was sufficient to measure subthreshold bipolarity. The short 13-item Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) was used for comparison. RESULTS: In accordance with the SCID-II criteria, we included 59 bipolar I and 63 unipolar (depressed) outpatients who had recently been discharged from inpatient treatment. In the HCL-32, PCA identified the two contrasting factors: active/elevated mood versus risk-taking/irritable behaviour. The clinical validation analysis focussed on 20 HCL items as the most acceptable (HCL-20). Item response analysis accepted that the total scores of the HCL-32/HCL-20 were a sufficient statistic, as was the total score of the MDQ. Among the unipolar (depressed) patients not responding to their antidepressive medication, subtreshold bipolarity was identified in 55% of patients using the HCL-20, 36% using the HCL-32, but only 18% using the MDQ. LIMITATIONS: Only outpatients recently discharged from inpatient treatment were studied. A further limitation is that 9.5% of the unipolar patients had only suffered from one episode, which, however had led to hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: The HCL-20 was found to identify subthreshold bipolarity in up to 55% of inpatients with major depressive disorder not responding to antidepressive medication.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) was developed to identify subthreshold bipolarity in patients with major depression. An HCL-32 version with fewer items has been suggested. METHODS: Principal component analysis (PCA) without rotation was used to identify active/elevated mood versus risk-taking/irritable behaviour in the HCL-32. Using the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale as index of clinical validity a shorter version was developed. Item response theory analysis was used to evaluate whether the total score of the HCL-32 was sufficient to measure subthreshold bipolarity. The short 13-item Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) was used for comparison. RESULTS: In accordance with the SCID-II criteria, we included 59 bipolar I and 63 unipolar (depressed) outpatients who had recently been discharged from inpatient treatment. In the HCL-32, PCA identified the two contrasting factors: active/elevated mood versus risk-taking/irritable behaviour. The clinical validation analysis focussed on 20 HCL items as the most acceptable (HCL-20). Item response analysis accepted that the total scores of the HCL-32/HCL-20 were a sufficient statistic, as was the total score of the MDQ. Among the unipolar (depressed) patients not responding to their antidepressive medication, subtreshold bipolarity was identified in 55% of patients using the HCL-20, 36% using the HCL-32, but only 18% using the MDQ. LIMITATIONS: Only outpatients recently discharged from inpatient treatment were studied. A further limitation is that 9.5% of the unipolar patients had only suffered from one episode, which, however had led to hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: The HCL-20 was found to identify subthreshold bipolarity in up to 55% of inpatients with major depressive disorder not responding to antidepressive medication.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.017

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21349588

VL - 132

SP - 48

EP - 54

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -

ID: 34103460