Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring? Debatten om verdens første genredigerede mennesker.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Formidling

Standard

Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring? Debatten om verdens første genredigerede mennesker. / Scott-Fordsmand, Helene; Heðinsdóttir, Katla.

I: Bibliotek for Laeger, Bind 211, Nr. 2, 04.06.2019, s. 148-157.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Formidling

Harvard

Scott-Fordsmand, H & Heðinsdóttir, K 2019, 'Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring? Debatten om verdens første genredigerede mennesker.', Bibliotek for Laeger, bind 211, nr. 2, s. 148-157. <https://ugeskriftet.dk/bfl/er-der-noget-galt-i-bioteknologisk-forbedring>

APA

Scott-Fordsmand, H., & Heðinsdóttir, K. (2019). Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring? Debatten om verdens første genredigerede mennesker. Bibliotek for Laeger, 211(2), 148-157. https://ugeskriftet.dk/bfl/er-der-noget-galt-i-bioteknologisk-forbedring

Vancouver

Scott-Fordsmand H, Heðinsdóttir K. Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring? Debatten om verdens første genredigerede mennesker. Bibliotek for Laeger. 2019 jun. 4;211(2):148-157.

Author

Scott-Fordsmand, Helene ; Heðinsdóttir, Katla. / Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring? Debatten om verdens første genredigerede mennesker. I: Bibliotek for Laeger. 2019 ; Bind 211, Nr. 2. s. 148-157.

Bibtex

@article{35cfb2496f8143999d9bde5db0d9dfa9,
title = "Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring?: Debatten om verdens f{\o}rste genredigerede mennesker.",
abstract = "In November 2018, news of the genetically edited newborns, Nana and Lulu, spread across the world. Scientists and ethicists almost unanimously condemned the experiment which led to their existence, as risk factors of using the CRISPR-technology are largely unknown and the possible scenarios it may bring about are ethically unaccounted for. Considering this event, this article briefly investigates the problem of human enhancement. A common public objection to enhancement technologies is that human beings should not “play God”. However, this statement is often philosophically neglected, perhaps because of its religious connotations. By exploring the existential-hermeneutical thoughts of Martin Heidegger, we provide a philosophical ground for such an argument, and conclude that there are good reasons for a continuous critical debate about emerging biotechnologies.",
author = "Helene Scott-Fordsmand and Katla He{\dh}insd{\'o}ttir",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "4",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "211",
pages = "148--157",
journal = "Bibliotek for Laeger",
issn = "0906-5407",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Er der noget galt i bioteknologisk forbedring?

T2 - Debatten om verdens første genredigerede mennesker.

AU - Scott-Fordsmand, Helene

AU - Heðinsdóttir, Katla

PY - 2019/6/4

Y1 - 2019/6/4

N2 - In November 2018, news of the genetically edited newborns, Nana and Lulu, spread across the world. Scientists and ethicists almost unanimously condemned the experiment which led to their existence, as risk factors of using the CRISPR-technology are largely unknown and the possible scenarios it may bring about are ethically unaccounted for. Considering this event, this article briefly investigates the problem of human enhancement. A common public objection to enhancement technologies is that human beings should not “play God”. However, this statement is often philosophically neglected, perhaps because of its religious connotations. By exploring the existential-hermeneutical thoughts of Martin Heidegger, we provide a philosophical ground for such an argument, and conclude that there are good reasons for a continuous critical debate about emerging biotechnologies.

AB - In November 2018, news of the genetically edited newborns, Nana and Lulu, spread across the world. Scientists and ethicists almost unanimously condemned the experiment which led to their existence, as risk factors of using the CRISPR-technology are largely unknown and the possible scenarios it may bring about are ethically unaccounted for. Considering this event, this article briefly investigates the problem of human enhancement. A common public objection to enhancement technologies is that human beings should not “play God”. However, this statement is often philosophically neglected, perhaps because of its religious connotations. By exploring the existential-hermeneutical thoughts of Martin Heidegger, we provide a philosophical ground for such an argument, and conclude that there are good reasons for a continuous critical debate about emerging biotechnologies.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 211

SP - 148

EP - 157

JO - Bibliotek for Laeger

JF - Bibliotek for Laeger

SN - 0906-5407

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 234414577