Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark. / Lehmann, Lisa Mølgaard; Borzęcka, Magdalena; Żyłowska, Katarzyna; Pisanelli, Andrea; Russo, Giuseppe; Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur.

I: Energies, Bind 13, Nr. 4, 849, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lehmann, LM, Borzęcka, M, Żyłowska, K, Pisanelli, A, Russo, G & Ghaley, BB 2020, 'Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark', Energies, bind 13, nr. 4, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040849

APA

Lehmann, L. M., Borzęcka, M., Żyłowska, K., Pisanelli, A., Russo, G., & Ghaley, B. B. (2020). Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark. Energies, 13(4), [849]. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040849

Vancouver

Lehmann LM, Borzęcka M, Żyłowska K, Pisanelli A, Russo G, Ghaley BB. Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark. Energies. 2020;13(4). 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040849

Author

Lehmann, Lisa Mølgaard ; Borzęcka, Magdalena ; Żyłowska, Katarzyna ; Pisanelli, Andrea ; Russo, Giuseppe ; Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur. / Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark. I: Energies. 2020 ; Bind 13, Nr. 4.

Bibtex

@article{8769fc981d5643548b53dc53d83893b8,
title = "Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark",
abstract = "Given the environmental footprints of the conventional agriculture, it is imperative to test and validate alternative production systems, with lower environmental impacts to mitigate and adapt our production systems. In this study, we identified six production systems, four in Italy and two in Denmark, to assess the environmental footprint for comparison among the production systems and additionally with conventional production systems. SimaPro 8.4 software was used to carry out the life cycle impact assessment. Among other indicators, three significantly important indicators, namely global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication, were used as the proxy for life cycle impact assessment. In Italy, the production systems compared were silvopastoral, organic, traditional, and conventional olive production systems, whereas in Denmark, combined food and energy production system was compared with the conventional wheat production system. Among the six production systems, conventional wheat production system in Denmark accounted for highest global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication. In Italy, global warming potential was highest in traditional agroforestry and lowest in the silvopastoral system whereas acidification and eutrophication were lowest in the traditional production system with high acidification effects from the silvopastoral system. In Italy, machinery use contributed the highest greenhouse gas emissions in silvopastoral and organic production systems, while the large contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizer was recorded in the traditional and conventional production systems. In Denmark, the combined food and energy system had lower environmental impacts compared to the conventional wheat production system according to the three indicators. For both systems in Denmark, the main contribution to greenhouse gas emission was due to fertilizer and manure application. The study showed that integrated food and non-food systems are more environmentally friendly and less polluting compared to the conventional wheat production system in Denmark with use of chemical fertilizers and irrigation. The study can contribute to informed decision making by the land managers and policy makers for promotion of environmentally friendly food and non-food production practices, to meet the European Union targets of providing biomass-based materials and energy to contribute to the bio-based economy in Europe and beyond.",
keywords = "Acidification, Agroforestry, Conventional wheat, Eutrophication, Global warming potential, Life cycle assessment, Olive trees, Silvopastoral",
author = "Lehmann, {Lisa M{\o}lgaard} and Magdalena Borz{\c e}cka and Katarzyna {\.Z}y{\l}owska and Andrea Pisanelli and Giuseppe Russo and Ghaley, {Bhim Bahadur}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3390/en13040849",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Energies",
issn = "1996-1073",
publisher = "M D P I AG",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental impact assessments of integrated food and non-food production systems in Italy and Denmark

AU - Lehmann, Lisa Mølgaard

AU - Borzęcka, Magdalena

AU - Żyłowska, Katarzyna

AU - Pisanelli, Andrea

AU - Russo, Giuseppe

AU - Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Given the environmental footprints of the conventional agriculture, it is imperative to test and validate alternative production systems, with lower environmental impacts to mitigate and adapt our production systems. In this study, we identified six production systems, four in Italy and two in Denmark, to assess the environmental footprint for comparison among the production systems and additionally with conventional production systems. SimaPro 8.4 software was used to carry out the life cycle impact assessment. Among other indicators, three significantly important indicators, namely global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication, were used as the proxy for life cycle impact assessment. In Italy, the production systems compared were silvopastoral, organic, traditional, and conventional olive production systems, whereas in Denmark, combined food and energy production system was compared with the conventional wheat production system. Among the six production systems, conventional wheat production system in Denmark accounted for highest global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication. In Italy, global warming potential was highest in traditional agroforestry and lowest in the silvopastoral system whereas acidification and eutrophication were lowest in the traditional production system with high acidification effects from the silvopastoral system. In Italy, machinery use contributed the highest greenhouse gas emissions in silvopastoral and organic production systems, while the large contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizer was recorded in the traditional and conventional production systems. In Denmark, the combined food and energy system had lower environmental impacts compared to the conventional wheat production system according to the three indicators. For both systems in Denmark, the main contribution to greenhouse gas emission was due to fertilizer and manure application. The study showed that integrated food and non-food systems are more environmentally friendly and less polluting compared to the conventional wheat production system in Denmark with use of chemical fertilizers and irrigation. The study can contribute to informed decision making by the land managers and policy makers for promotion of environmentally friendly food and non-food production practices, to meet the European Union targets of providing biomass-based materials and energy to contribute to the bio-based economy in Europe and beyond.

AB - Given the environmental footprints of the conventional agriculture, it is imperative to test and validate alternative production systems, with lower environmental impacts to mitigate and adapt our production systems. In this study, we identified six production systems, four in Italy and two in Denmark, to assess the environmental footprint for comparison among the production systems and additionally with conventional production systems. SimaPro 8.4 software was used to carry out the life cycle impact assessment. Among other indicators, three significantly important indicators, namely global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication, were used as the proxy for life cycle impact assessment. In Italy, the production systems compared were silvopastoral, organic, traditional, and conventional olive production systems, whereas in Denmark, combined food and energy production system was compared with the conventional wheat production system. Among the six production systems, conventional wheat production system in Denmark accounted for highest global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication. In Italy, global warming potential was highest in traditional agroforestry and lowest in the silvopastoral system whereas acidification and eutrophication were lowest in the traditional production system with high acidification effects from the silvopastoral system. In Italy, machinery use contributed the highest greenhouse gas emissions in silvopastoral and organic production systems, while the large contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizer was recorded in the traditional and conventional production systems. In Denmark, the combined food and energy system had lower environmental impacts compared to the conventional wheat production system according to the three indicators. For both systems in Denmark, the main contribution to greenhouse gas emission was due to fertilizer and manure application. The study showed that integrated food and non-food systems are more environmentally friendly and less polluting compared to the conventional wheat production system in Denmark with use of chemical fertilizers and irrigation. The study can contribute to informed decision making by the land managers and policy makers for promotion of environmentally friendly food and non-food production practices, to meet the European Union targets of providing biomass-based materials and energy to contribute to the bio-based economy in Europe and beyond.

KW - Acidification

KW - Agroforestry

KW - Conventional wheat

KW - Eutrophication

KW - Global warming potential

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Olive trees

KW - Silvopastoral

U2 - 10.3390/en13040849

DO - 10.3390/en13040849

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85079547204

VL - 13

JO - Energies

JF - Energies

SN - 1996-1073

IS - 4

M1 - 849

ER -

ID: 237844030