Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark. / Amsalu, Dareskedar Workie; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl; Lundhede, Thomas.

I: European Journal of Forest Research, Bind 133, Nr. 4, 2014, s. 611-622.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Amsalu, DW, Jacobsen, JB & Lundhede, T 2014, 'Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark', European Journal of Forest Research, bind 133, nr. 4, s. 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0789-3

APA

Amsalu, D. W., Jacobsen, J. B., & Lundhede, T. (2014). Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark. European Journal of Forest Research, 133(4), 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0789-3

Vancouver

Amsalu DW, Jacobsen JB, Lundhede T. Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark. European Journal of Forest Research. 2014;133(4):611-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0789-3

Author

Amsalu, Dareskedar Workie ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Lundhede, Thomas. / Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark. I: European Journal of Forest Research. 2014 ; Bind 133, Nr. 4. s. 611-622.

Bibtex

@article{7775296fe72d46a0badb5b3c0507b457,
title = "Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark",
abstract = "The present study is a cost-benefit analysis of converting the current rotational forestry (RF) of Norway spruce stand into near-natural forestry (NNF) of beech, based on two representative soil conditions and visitors popular case areas in Denmark, considering welfare economic values of timber, recreation provision, and groundwater recharge. The study answers the major research question of how large the welfare economic values of recreation and groundwater benefits of the conversion are as compared with timber benefits. The net present values (NPV) of the benefits were calculated for an infinite time horizon at a 3 % discount rate. The results reveal that converting into NNF would result in a NPV of at least 6,832 € ha−1 from use values of recreation and water benefit on a site with good soil and a high visitor frequency, as is typical in the eastern part of Denmark. On a site in the west of the country, with poor growth conditions and a lower visitor frequency, the gain is still substantial, namely 5,581 € ha−1. These benefits though come at a cost of 3,375 and 6,206 € ha−1 from timber production, respectively. This means that the economic value of use values of recreation and water benefits outweighs the loss of timber on good soil conditions but not on poor soil conditions.",
author = "Amsalu, {Dareskedar Workie} and Jacobsen, {Jette Bredahl} and Thomas Lundhede",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10342-014-0789-3",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "611--622",
journal = "European Journal of Forest Research",
issn = "1612-4669",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark

AU - Amsalu, Dareskedar Workie

AU - Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl

AU - Lundhede, Thomas

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The present study is a cost-benefit analysis of converting the current rotational forestry (RF) of Norway spruce stand into near-natural forestry (NNF) of beech, based on two representative soil conditions and visitors popular case areas in Denmark, considering welfare economic values of timber, recreation provision, and groundwater recharge. The study answers the major research question of how large the welfare economic values of recreation and groundwater benefits of the conversion are as compared with timber benefits. The net present values (NPV) of the benefits were calculated for an infinite time horizon at a 3 % discount rate. The results reveal that converting into NNF would result in a NPV of at least 6,832 € ha−1 from use values of recreation and water benefit on a site with good soil and a high visitor frequency, as is typical in the eastern part of Denmark. On a site in the west of the country, with poor growth conditions and a lower visitor frequency, the gain is still substantial, namely 5,581 € ha−1. These benefits though come at a cost of 3,375 and 6,206 € ha−1 from timber production, respectively. This means that the economic value of use values of recreation and water benefits outweighs the loss of timber on good soil conditions but not on poor soil conditions.

AB - The present study is a cost-benefit analysis of converting the current rotational forestry (RF) of Norway spruce stand into near-natural forestry (NNF) of beech, based on two representative soil conditions and visitors popular case areas in Denmark, considering welfare economic values of timber, recreation provision, and groundwater recharge. The study answers the major research question of how large the welfare economic values of recreation and groundwater benefits of the conversion are as compared with timber benefits. The net present values (NPV) of the benefits were calculated for an infinite time horizon at a 3 % discount rate. The results reveal that converting into NNF would result in a NPV of at least 6,832 € ha−1 from use values of recreation and water benefit on a site with good soil and a high visitor frequency, as is typical in the eastern part of Denmark. On a site in the west of the country, with poor growth conditions and a lower visitor frequency, the gain is still substantial, namely 5,581 € ha−1. These benefits though come at a cost of 3,375 and 6,206 € ha−1 from timber production, respectively. This means that the economic value of use values of recreation and water benefits outweighs the loss of timber on good soil conditions but not on poor soil conditions.

U2 - 10.1007/s10342-014-0789-3

DO - 10.1007/s10342-014-0789-3

M3 - Journal article

VL - 133

SP - 611

EP - 622

JO - European Journal of Forest Research

JF - European Journal of Forest Research

SN - 1612-4669

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 134782864