Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa. / Ring, Hans Christian; Maul, Julia-Tatjana; Yao, Yiqiu; Wu, Jashin J.; Thyssen, Jacob P.; Thomsen, Simon F.; Egeberg, Alexander.

I: JAMA Dermatology, Bind 158, Nr. 2, 2022, s. 184-188.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ring, HC, Maul, J-T, Yao, Y, Wu, JJ, Thyssen, JP, Thomsen, SF & Egeberg, A 2022, 'Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa', JAMA Dermatology, bind 158, nr. 2, s. 184-188. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4805

APA

Ring, H. C., Maul, J-T., Yao, Y., Wu, J. J., Thyssen, J. P., Thomsen, S. F., & Egeberg, A. (2022). Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa. JAMA Dermatology, 158(2), 184-188. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4805

Vancouver

Ring HC, Maul J-T, Yao Y, Wu JJ, Thyssen JP, Thomsen SF o.a. Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa. JAMA Dermatology. 2022;158(2):184-188. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4805

Author

Ring, Hans Christian ; Maul, Julia-Tatjana ; Yao, Yiqiu ; Wu, Jashin J. ; Thyssen, Jacob P. ; Thomsen, Simon F. ; Egeberg, Alexander. / Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa. I: JAMA Dermatology. 2022 ; Bind 158, Nr. 2. s. 184-188.

Bibtex

@article{2861709cf01a4fbcb5aa3fdfc111642b,
title = "Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE Biologics are important in treating patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, to our knowledge, data on their real-life performance and treatment patterns in HS are limited.OBJECTIVE To examine the drug survival of biologic therapies for HS in a real-world setting.DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included all patients with HS between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, who were treated with biologics at the 5 academic hospital clinics where all biologic treatment for HS is conducted in Denmark. Biologics included adalimumab, anakinra, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab. Data were analyzed between June 1, 2021, and June 20, 2021.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Drug survival was depicted through Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression models were used to calculate adjusted (age, sex, previous number of biologic treatment series) hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for the risk of treatment discontinuation. Switching patterns were visualized through a Sankey diagram.RESULTS The study comprised 241 patients (176 women [61.8%]; total of 386 treatment series) with a mean (SD) age of 41.8 (12.6) years at initiation of first biologic therapy. There were a total of 256 (189 [73.8%] biologic naive), 66 (32 [48.5%] biologic naive), 23 (9 [39.1%] biologic naive), and 22 (9 [40.9%] biologic naive) treatment series with adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, and ustekinumab, respectively. The median time to discontinuation was 36.0 (IQR, 21.9-63.0), 28.7 (IQR, 15.1-62.9), 26.0 (IQR, 16.9-155.9), and 17.9 weeks (IQR, 12.9-41.0) for adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and etanercept, respectively. The risk of drug discontinuation was significantly higher for etanercept compared with adalimumab (aHR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.16-2.82), infliximab (aHR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.03-3.05), and ustekinumab (aHR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.52), whereas no difference was observed when comparing these 3 therapies with each other. We found no significant differences in drug survival for biologic-naive vs nonnaive treatment series. Increasing C-reactive protein levels (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03) and concomitant antibiotic treatment (aHR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.36-5.86) were associated with the risk of discontinuing infliximab therapy. Men (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91) had a reduced risk of discontinuing use of adalimumab.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, drug survival was comparable between adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab but significantly lower for etanercept. There were no differences in drug survival among biologic-naive and nonnaive patients.",
keywords = "TNF-ALPHA, ADALIMUMAB, MODERATE, SKIN",
author = "Ring, {Hans Christian} and Julia-Tatjana Maul and Yiqiu Yao and Wu, {Jashin J.} and Thyssen, {Jacob P.} and Thomsen, {Simon F.} and Alexander Egeberg",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4805",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "184--188",
journal = "JAMA Dermatology",
issn = "2168-6068",
publisher = "The JAMA Network",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

AU - Ring, Hans Christian

AU - Maul, Julia-Tatjana

AU - Yao, Yiqiu

AU - Wu, Jashin J.

AU - Thyssen, Jacob P.

AU - Thomsen, Simon F.

AU - Egeberg, Alexander

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - IMPORTANCE Biologics are important in treating patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, to our knowledge, data on their real-life performance and treatment patterns in HS are limited.OBJECTIVE To examine the drug survival of biologic therapies for HS in a real-world setting.DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included all patients with HS between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, who were treated with biologics at the 5 academic hospital clinics where all biologic treatment for HS is conducted in Denmark. Biologics included adalimumab, anakinra, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab. Data were analyzed between June 1, 2021, and June 20, 2021.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Drug survival was depicted through Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression models were used to calculate adjusted (age, sex, previous number of biologic treatment series) hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for the risk of treatment discontinuation. Switching patterns were visualized through a Sankey diagram.RESULTS The study comprised 241 patients (176 women [61.8%]; total of 386 treatment series) with a mean (SD) age of 41.8 (12.6) years at initiation of first biologic therapy. There were a total of 256 (189 [73.8%] biologic naive), 66 (32 [48.5%] biologic naive), 23 (9 [39.1%] biologic naive), and 22 (9 [40.9%] biologic naive) treatment series with adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, and ustekinumab, respectively. The median time to discontinuation was 36.0 (IQR, 21.9-63.0), 28.7 (IQR, 15.1-62.9), 26.0 (IQR, 16.9-155.9), and 17.9 weeks (IQR, 12.9-41.0) for adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and etanercept, respectively. The risk of drug discontinuation was significantly higher for etanercept compared with adalimumab (aHR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.16-2.82), infliximab (aHR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.03-3.05), and ustekinumab (aHR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.52), whereas no difference was observed when comparing these 3 therapies with each other. We found no significant differences in drug survival for biologic-naive vs nonnaive treatment series. Increasing C-reactive protein levels (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03) and concomitant antibiotic treatment (aHR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.36-5.86) were associated with the risk of discontinuing infliximab therapy. Men (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91) had a reduced risk of discontinuing use of adalimumab.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, drug survival was comparable between adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab but significantly lower for etanercept. There were no differences in drug survival among biologic-naive and nonnaive patients.

AB - IMPORTANCE Biologics are important in treating patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, to our knowledge, data on their real-life performance and treatment patterns in HS are limited.OBJECTIVE To examine the drug survival of biologic therapies for HS in a real-world setting.DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included all patients with HS between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, who were treated with biologics at the 5 academic hospital clinics where all biologic treatment for HS is conducted in Denmark. Biologics included adalimumab, anakinra, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab. Data were analyzed between June 1, 2021, and June 20, 2021.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Drug survival was depicted through Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression models were used to calculate adjusted (age, sex, previous number of biologic treatment series) hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for the risk of treatment discontinuation. Switching patterns were visualized through a Sankey diagram.RESULTS The study comprised 241 patients (176 women [61.8%]; total of 386 treatment series) with a mean (SD) age of 41.8 (12.6) years at initiation of first biologic therapy. There were a total of 256 (189 [73.8%] biologic naive), 66 (32 [48.5%] biologic naive), 23 (9 [39.1%] biologic naive), and 22 (9 [40.9%] biologic naive) treatment series with adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, and ustekinumab, respectively. The median time to discontinuation was 36.0 (IQR, 21.9-63.0), 28.7 (IQR, 15.1-62.9), 26.0 (IQR, 16.9-155.9), and 17.9 weeks (IQR, 12.9-41.0) for adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and etanercept, respectively. The risk of drug discontinuation was significantly higher for etanercept compared with adalimumab (aHR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.16-2.82), infliximab (aHR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.03-3.05), and ustekinumab (aHR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.52), whereas no difference was observed when comparing these 3 therapies with each other. We found no significant differences in drug survival for biologic-naive vs nonnaive treatment series. Increasing C-reactive protein levels (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03) and concomitant antibiotic treatment (aHR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.36-5.86) were associated with the risk of discontinuing infliximab therapy. Men (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91) had a reduced risk of discontinuing use of adalimumab.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, drug survival was comparable between adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab but significantly lower for etanercept. There were no differences in drug survival among biologic-naive and nonnaive patients.

KW - TNF-ALPHA

KW - ADALIMUMAB

KW - MODERATE

KW - SKIN

U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4805

DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4805

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34851360

VL - 158

SP - 184

EP - 188

JO - JAMA Dermatology

JF - JAMA Dermatology

SN - 2168-6068

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 286858933