cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System: Nationwide Cohort Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System : Nationwide Cohort Study. / Frydenlund, Juliane; Mackenhauer, Julie; Christensen, Erika F.; Christensen, Helle Collatz; Væggemose, Ulla; Steinmetz, Jacob; Johnsen, Søren Paaske.

I: Clinical Epidemiology, Bind 14, 2022, s. 555-565.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Frydenlund, J, Mackenhauer, J, Christensen, EF, Christensen, HC, Væggemose, U, Steinmetz, J & Johnsen, SP 2022, 'cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System: Nationwide Cohort Study', Clinical Epidemiology, bind 14, s. 555-565. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S358801

APA

Frydenlund, J., Mackenhauer, J., Christensen, E. F., Christensen, H. C., Væggemose, U., Steinmetz, J., & Johnsen, S. P. (2022). cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System: Nationwide Cohort Study. Clinical Epidemiology, 14, 555-565. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S358801

Vancouver

Frydenlund J, Mackenhauer J, Christensen EF, Christensen HC, Væggemose U, Steinmetz J o.a. cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System: Nationwide Cohort Study. Clinical Epidemiology. 2022;14:555-565. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S358801

Author

Frydenlund, Juliane ; Mackenhauer, Julie ; Christensen, Erika F. ; Christensen, Helle Collatz ; Væggemose, Ulla ; Steinmetz, Jacob ; Johnsen, Søren Paaske. / cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System : Nationwide Cohort Study. I: Clinical Epidemiology. 2022 ; Bind 14. s. 555-565.

Bibtex

@article{f21cad662da04831be42e0d1b2887c39,
title = "cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System: Nationwide Cohort Study",
abstract = "Background: Differences related to socioeconomic status (SES) in use of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) have been reported. However, detailed data on potential disparities in the quality of the EMS according to SES are lacking. Methods: A nationwide cohort study of medical emergency calls made to the Danish emergency number 1-1-2 in the period 2016–2017. To measure quality of care, performance indicators from the Danish Quality Registry for Prehospital Emergency Medical Services were used. SES was based on income, education and adherence to workforce. Poisson regression was used to measure relative risk (RR). Results: We included 388,378 medical 1-1-2 calls, of which 261,771 were unique individuals; 42% of the calls concerned patients with low education, 5% concerned patients living in relative poverty and 23% concerned patients receiving social subsidy. There were no significant differences between the SES regarding time span for arrival of first EMS units. However, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to be released at scene and to call again within 24 hours: Adjusted RRs were 2.79 [2.20; 3.54] and 2.08 [1.58; 2.75], respectively, compared with patients having a job. In addition, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to call again within 24 hours after receiving telephone advice only: Adjusted RRs 2.35 [1.95; 2.82] and 1.88 [1.51; 2.35], respectively compared with patients having a job. Adjusted RRs for unplanned hospital contact after being treated and released at scene were higher for patients receiving social subsidy and retired people, respectively, relative to patients having a job. Conclusion: Patients with low SES were significantly more likely to contact the hospital or EMS again after their first call or after treatment and release at scene compared with patients with high SES. This indicates that callers with low SES did not receive the appropriate help.",
keywords = "Denmark, EMS, prehospital, register study, socioeconomic",
author = "Juliane Frydenlund and Julie Mackenhauer and Christensen, {Erika F.} and Christensen, {Helle Collatz} and Ulla V{\ae}ggemose and Jacob Steinmetz and Johnsen, {S{\o}ren Paaske}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Frydenlund et al.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.2147/CLEP.S358801",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "555--565",
journal = "Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "1179-1349",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - cSocioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System

T2 - Nationwide Cohort Study

AU - Frydenlund, Juliane

AU - Mackenhauer, Julie

AU - Christensen, Erika F.

AU - Christensen, Helle Collatz

AU - Væggemose, Ulla

AU - Steinmetz, Jacob

AU - Johnsen, Søren Paaske

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Frydenlund et al.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: Differences related to socioeconomic status (SES) in use of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) have been reported. However, detailed data on potential disparities in the quality of the EMS according to SES are lacking. Methods: A nationwide cohort study of medical emergency calls made to the Danish emergency number 1-1-2 in the period 2016–2017. To measure quality of care, performance indicators from the Danish Quality Registry for Prehospital Emergency Medical Services were used. SES was based on income, education and adherence to workforce. Poisson regression was used to measure relative risk (RR). Results: We included 388,378 medical 1-1-2 calls, of which 261,771 were unique individuals; 42% of the calls concerned patients with low education, 5% concerned patients living in relative poverty and 23% concerned patients receiving social subsidy. There were no significant differences between the SES regarding time span for arrival of first EMS units. However, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to be released at scene and to call again within 24 hours: Adjusted RRs were 2.79 [2.20; 3.54] and 2.08 [1.58; 2.75], respectively, compared with patients having a job. In addition, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to call again within 24 hours after receiving telephone advice only: Adjusted RRs 2.35 [1.95; 2.82] and 1.88 [1.51; 2.35], respectively compared with patients having a job. Adjusted RRs for unplanned hospital contact after being treated and released at scene were higher for patients receiving social subsidy and retired people, respectively, relative to patients having a job. Conclusion: Patients with low SES were significantly more likely to contact the hospital or EMS again after their first call or after treatment and release at scene compared with patients with high SES. This indicates that callers with low SES did not receive the appropriate help.

AB - Background: Differences related to socioeconomic status (SES) in use of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) have been reported. However, detailed data on potential disparities in the quality of the EMS according to SES are lacking. Methods: A nationwide cohort study of medical emergency calls made to the Danish emergency number 1-1-2 in the period 2016–2017. To measure quality of care, performance indicators from the Danish Quality Registry for Prehospital Emergency Medical Services were used. SES was based on income, education and adherence to workforce. Poisson regression was used to measure relative risk (RR). Results: We included 388,378 medical 1-1-2 calls, of which 261,771 were unique individuals; 42% of the calls concerned patients with low education, 5% concerned patients living in relative poverty and 23% concerned patients receiving social subsidy. There were no significant differences between the SES regarding time span for arrival of first EMS units. However, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to be released at scene and to call again within 24 hours: Adjusted RRs were 2.79 [2.20; 3.54] and 2.08 [1.58; 2.75], respectively, compared with patients having a job. In addition, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to call again within 24 hours after receiving telephone advice only: Adjusted RRs 2.35 [1.95; 2.82] and 1.88 [1.51; 2.35], respectively compared with patients having a job. Adjusted RRs for unplanned hospital contact after being treated and released at scene were higher for patients receiving social subsidy and retired people, respectively, relative to patients having a job. Conclusion: Patients with low SES were significantly more likely to contact the hospital or EMS again after their first call or after treatment and release at scene compared with patients with high SES. This indicates that callers with low SES did not receive the appropriate help.

KW - Denmark

KW - EMS

KW - prehospital

KW - register study

KW - socioeconomic

U2 - 10.2147/CLEP.S358801

DO - 10.2147/CLEP.S358801

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35509522

AN - SCOPUS:85129847731

VL - 14

SP - 555

EP - 565

JO - Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 1179-1349

ER -

ID: 314146724