Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents. / Wegener, Henrik Caspar; Baggesen, Dorte Lau.

I: Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Bind 9, Nr. 4, 1997, s. 352-356.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Wegener, HC & Baggesen, DL 1997, 'Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents', Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, bind 9, nr. 4, s. 352-356.

APA

Wegener, H. C., & Baggesen, D. L. (1997). Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 9(4), 352-356.

Vancouver

Wegener HC, Baggesen DL. Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 1997;9(4):352-356.

Author

Wegener, Henrik Caspar ; Baggesen, Dorte Lau. / Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents. I: Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 1997 ; Bind 9, Nr. 4. s. 352-356.

Bibtex

@article{7a292de430ce4c14a4df346f8a13a731,
title = "Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents",
abstract = "Two commercial enzyme immunoassays, designated EIA-1 and EIA-2, for the detection of salmonella in feces and cecal contents were compared to conventional culture methods. Out of 362 cecal content samples, 35 were positive by EIA-1 and 30 were positive by EIA-2 and conventional methods. Out of 189 fecal samples, 41 were positive by EIA-1, 30 were positive by EIA-2, and 24 were positive by conventional culture methods. The EIA-1 assay method detected more positive samples overall, although only comparison of the fecal samples was statistically significant. The results indicate that the EIA-1 method is rapid, requiring only 24 hours, and may he more sensitive than the EIA-2 assay and conventional culture techniques. Enzyme immunoassays for the detection elf salmonella in fecal samples or cecal contents provide a reasonable alternative to conventional culture techniques.",
author = "Wegener, {Henrik Caspar} and Baggesen, {Dorte Lau}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "352--356",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation",
issn = "1040-6387",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents

AU - Wegener, Henrik Caspar

AU - Baggesen, Dorte Lau

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Two commercial enzyme immunoassays, designated EIA-1 and EIA-2, for the detection of salmonella in feces and cecal contents were compared to conventional culture methods. Out of 362 cecal content samples, 35 were positive by EIA-1 and 30 were positive by EIA-2 and conventional methods. Out of 189 fecal samples, 41 were positive by EIA-1, 30 were positive by EIA-2, and 24 were positive by conventional culture methods. The EIA-1 assay method detected more positive samples overall, although only comparison of the fecal samples was statistically significant. The results indicate that the EIA-1 method is rapid, requiring only 24 hours, and may he more sensitive than the EIA-2 assay and conventional culture techniques. Enzyme immunoassays for the detection elf salmonella in fecal samples or cecal contents provide a reasonable alternative to conventional culture techniques.

AB - Two commercial enzyme immunoassays, designated EIA-1 and EIA-2, for the detection of salmonella in feces and cecal contents were compared to conventional culture methods. Out of 362 cecal content samples, 35 were positive by EIA-1 and 30 were positive by EIA-2 and conventional methods. Out of 189 fecal samples, 41 were positive by EIA-1, 30 were positive by EIA-2, and 24 were positive by conventional culture methods. The EIA-1 assay method detected more positive samples overall, although only comparison of the fecal samples was statistically significant. The results indicate that the EIA-1 method is rapid, requiring only 24 hours, and may he more sensitive than the EIA-2 assay and conventional culture techniques. Enzyme immunoassays for the detection elf salmonella in fecal samples or cecal contents provide a reasonable alternative to conventional culture techniques.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 352

EP - 356

JO - Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

JF - Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

SN - 1040-6387

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 172807998