Collaboration in colorectal surgical research

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Surgical research has been under-powered, under-funded and under-delivered for decades. A solution may be to form large research collaborations and thereby enable implementation of successful interventional trials as well as robust international observational studies with thousands of patients. There are many such research collaborations in colorectal surgery, and in this paper we have highlighted the experiences from the West Midlands Research Collaborative (WMRC), the Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG) and the European Society of Coloproctology. With active research networks, it is possible to deliver large, high-quality studies and provide high-level evidence for solving important clinical questions in an efficient and timely manner.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftColorectal Disease
Vol/bind23
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)2741-2749
Antal sider9
ISSN1462-8910
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
In both COLOR and COLOR II, a secretariat was funded by grants to the principal investigator, and no recruitment fee was required from participating hospitals. The main grant for the central secretariat was given from a technical commercial company (Ethicon Endo‐Surgery Europe). In COLOR and COLOR II Ethicon Endo‐Surgery Europe had no influence on the trial protocol, on running the trial, on analyses, on conclusions or on publications, which is important to ascertain scientific independence. In both COLOR and COLOR II local investigators may have sought funding from local/national organizations but this was not a requirement for participation. A central secretariat collected data and was active in reminding local centres of missing case report forms (CRFs). In the Swedish part of the trials, all patient‐related outcome measures (quality of life, function, etc.) were obtained through questionnaires sent from and returned to the Swedish secretariat, a ‘third party’, in order to lessen the ‘I want to please my surgeon’ effect [ 8 ]. It is perhaps one factor explaining the high patient response rates.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

ID: 304154105