Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care. / Rasmussen, Peter Vibe; Skov, Morten Wagner; Ghouse, Jonas; Pietersen, Adrian; Hansen, Steen Moller; Torp-Pedersen, Christian; Kober, Lars; Haunso, Stig; Olesen, Morten Salling; Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup; Melgaard, Jacob; Graff, Claus; Holst, Anders Gaardsdal; Nielsen, Jonas Bille.

I: Heart, Bind 105, Nr. 15, 2019, s. 1160-1167.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rasmussen, PV, Skov, MW, Ghouse, J, Pietersen, A, Hansen, SM, Torp-Pedersen, C, Kober, L, Haunso, S, Olesen, MS, Svendsen, JH, Melgaard, J, Graff, C, Holst, AG & Nielsen, JB 2019, 'Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care', Heart, bind 105, nr. 15, s. 1160-1167. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314295

APA

Rasmussen, P. V., Skov, M. W., Ghouse, J., Pietersen, A., Hansen, S. M., Torp-Pedersen, C., Kober, L., Haunso, S., Olesen, M. S., Svendsen, J. H., Melgaard, J., Graff, C., Holst, A. G., & Nielsen, J. B. (2019). Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care. Heart, 105(15), 1160-1167. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314295

Vancouver

Rasmussen PV, Skov MW, Ghouse J, Pietersen A, Hansen SM, Torp-Pedersen C o.a. Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care. Heart. 2019;105(15):1160-1167. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314295

Author

Rasmussen, Peter Vibe ; Skov, Morten Wagner ; Ghouse, Jonas ; Pietersen, Adrian ; Hansen, Steen Moller ; Torp-Pedersen, Christian ; Kober, Lars ; Haunso, Stig ; Olesen, Morten Salling ; Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup ; Melgaard, Jacob ; Graff, Claus ; Holst, Anders Gaardsdal ; Nielsen, Jonas Bille. / Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care. I: Heart. 2019 ; Bind 105, Nr. 15. s. 1160-1167.

Bibtex

@article{26b0ff3ed78d451fabbfe469099c7595,
title = "Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care",
abstract = "Objectives Electrocardiographic bundle branch block (BBB) is common but the prognostic implications in primary care are unclear. We sought to investigate the relationship between electrocardiographic BBB subtypes and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a primary care population free of major CV disease. Methods Retrospective cohort study of primary care patients referred for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording between 2001 and 2011. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) as well as absolute risks of CV outcomes based on various BBB subtypes. Results We included 202 268 individuals with a median follow-up period of 7.8 years (Inter-quartile range [IQR] 4.9-10.6). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was associated with heart failure (HF) in both men (HR 3.96, 95% CI 3.30 to 4.76) and women (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.15 to 2.94) and with CV death in men (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.35). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was associated with pacemaker implantation in both men (HR 3.26, 95% CI 2.74 to 3.89) and women (HR 3.69, 95% CI 2.91 to 4.67), HF in both sexes and weakly associated with CV death in men. Regarding LBBB, we found an increasing hazard of HF with increasing QRS-interval duration (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42 per 10 ms increase in men and HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40 per 10 ms increase in women). Absolute 10-year risk predictions across age-specific and sex-specific subgroups revealed clinically relevant differences between having various BBB subtypes. Conclusions Opportunistic findings of BBB subtypes in primary care patients without major CV disease should be considered warnings of future HF and pacemaker implantation",
keywords = "electrocardiography, heart failure, pacemakers, cardiac risk factors and prevention",
author = "Rasmussen, {Peter Vibe} and Skov, {Morten Wagner} and Jonas Ghouse and Adrian Pietersen and Hansen, {Steen Moller} and Christian Torp-Pedersen and Lars Kober and Stig Haunso and Olesen, {Morten Salling} and Svendsen, {Jesper Hastrup} and Jacob Melgaard and Claus Graff and Holst, {Anders Gaardsdal} and Nielsen, {Jonas Bille}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314295",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "1160--1167",
journal = "Heart",
issn = "1355-6037",
publisher = "B M J Group",
number = "15",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care

AU - Rasmussen, Peter Vibe

AU - Skov, Morten Wagner

AU - Ghouse, Jonas

AU - Pietersen, Adrian

AU - Hansen, Steen Moller

AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian

AU - Kober, Lars

AU - Haunso, Stig

AU - Olesen, Morten Salling

AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup

AU - Melgaard, Jacob

AU - Graff, Claus

AU - Holst, Anders Gaardsdal

AU - Nielsen, Jonas Bille

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objectives Electrocardiographic bundle branch block (BBB) is common but the prognostic implications in primary care are unclear. We sought to investigate the relationship between electrocardiographic BBB subtypes and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a primary care population free of major CV disease. Methods Retrospective cohort study of primary care patients referred for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording between 2001 and 2011. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) as well as absolute risks of CV outcomes based on various BBB subtypes. Results We included 202 268 individuals with a median follow-up period of 7.8 years (Inter-quartile range [IQR] 4.9-10.6). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was associated with heart failure (HF) in both men (HR 3.96, 95% CI 3.30 to 4.76) and women (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.15 to 2.94) and with CV death in men (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.35). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was associated with pacemaker implantation in both men (HR 3.26, 95% CI 2.74 to 3.89) and women (HR 3.69, 95% CI 2.91 to 4.67), HF in both sexes and weakly associated with CV death in men. Regarding LBBB, we found an increasing hazard of HF with increasing QRS-interval duration (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42 per 10 ms increase in men and HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40 per 10 ms increase in women). Absolute 10-year risk predictions across age-specific and sex-specific subgroups revealed clinically relevant differences between having various BBB subtypes. Conclusions Opportunistic findings of BBB subtypes in primary care patients without major CV disease should be considered warnings of future HF and pacemaker implantation

AB - Objectives Electrocardiographic bundle branch block (BBB) is common but the prognostic implications in primary care are unclear. We sought to investigate the relationship between electrocardiographic BBB subtypes and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a primary care population free of major CV disease. Methods Retrospective cohort study of primary care patients referred for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording between 2001 and 2011. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) as well as absolute risks of CV outcomes based on various BBB subtypes. Results We included 202 268 individuals with a median follow-up period of 7.8 years (Inter-quartile range [IQR] 4.9-10.6). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was associated with heart failure (HF) in both men (HR 3.96, 95% CI 3.30 to 4.76) and women (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.15 to 2.94) and with CV death in men (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.35). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was associated with pacemaker implantation in both men (HR 3.26, 95% CI 2.74 to 3.89) and women (HR 3.69, 95% CI 2.91 to 4.67), HF in both sexes and weakly associated with CV death in men. Regarding LBBB, we found an increasing hazard of HF with increasing QRS-interval duration (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42 per 10 ms increase in men and HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40 per 10 ms increase in women). Absolute 10-year risk predictions across age-specific and sex-specific subgroups revealed clinically relevant differences between having various BBB subtypes. Conclusions Opportunistic findings of BBB subtypes in primary care patients without major CV disease should be considered warnings of future HF and pacemaker implantation

KW - electrocardiography

KW - heart failure

KW - pacemakers

KW - cardiac risk factors and prevention

U2 - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314295

DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314295

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31129608

VL - 105

SP - 1160

EP - 1167

JO - Heart

JF - Heart

SN - 1355-6037

IS - 15

ER -

ID: 225476959