Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries. / Rubin, Katrine Hass; Moller, Soren; Choudhury, Anup; Zorina, Olesya; Kalsekar, Sameer; Eriksen, Erik F.; Andersen, Morten; Abrahamsen, Bo.

I: Bone, Bind 134, 115296, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rubin, KH, Moller, S, Choudhury, A, Zorina, O, Kalsekar, S, Eriksen, EF, Andersen, M & Abrahamsen, B 2020, 'Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries', Bone, bind 134, 115296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296

APA

Rubin, K. H., Moller, S., Choudhury, A., Zorina, O., Kalsekar, S., Eriksen, E. F., Andersen, M., & Abrahamsen, B. (2020). Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries. Bone, 134, [115296]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296

Vancouver

Rubin KH, Moller S, Choudhury A, Zorina O, Kalsekar S, Eriksen EF o.a. Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries. Bone. 2020;134. 115296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296

Author

Rubin, Katrine Hass ; Moller, Soren ; Choudhury, Anup ; Zorina, Olesya ; Kalsekar, Sameer ; Eriksen, Erik F. ; Andersen, Morten ; Abrahamsen, Bo. / Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries. I: Bone. 2020 ; Bind 134.

Bibtex

@article{390352f589e44aedab25fac6b03936e7,
title = "Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries",
abstract = "Background: This observational safety study used national registers to compare the real world cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid (ZA) against oral bisphosphonates (oBP) and untreated population controls.Methods: Propensity score matched cohort study in Sweden and Denmark.Results: Matched cohort 1 included 8739 ZA users and 25,577 oBP users while matched cohort 2 included 8731 ZA users and 25,924 untreated subjects.In comparison to oBP users, heart failure risk was higher in ZA users, with an adjusted HR (adj) (95%CI) of 1.17 (1.04;1.32) and a higher all-cause mortality (adj HR 1.24 (1.15; 1.34)), however, there was no increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. In the comparison to untreated subjects, ZA users showed a higher risk of atrial fibrillation, adj HR 1.18 (1.05;1.32), arrhythmias adj HR 1.18 (1.06;1.31), and heart failure, adj HR 1.38 (1.24;1.54). Cardiovascular mortality was lower in ZA users (adj HR 0.87 (0.77; 0.98)) and risk of adverse skeletal outcomes was significantly higher, reflecting more severe osteoporosis in these patients. There was no association of cardiovascular risk with increasing exposure time. Sensitivity analyses produced similar findings with no substantial changes in event rates.Conclusions: We noted an increased risk of heart failure, fractures and death among ZA users compared with oral BP. The risk of cardiovascular and skeletal outcomes was higher in ZA users than in matched population controls, but there was no increase in cardiovascular mortality in ZA users compared to oral BP or untreated controls. Despite propensity score matching, it is not possible to determine with certainty whether the increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes is consistent with a true drug effect or higher baseline risk in patients who begin ZA treatment.",
keywords = "Propensity score, Matched cohorts, Observational cohort study, Cardiovascular risk, Skeletal risk, Zoledronic acid, BONE-MINERAL DENSITY, HEART-FAILURE, BISPHOSPHONATES, OSTEONECROSIS, POPULATION, JAW, CANCER, WOMEN, RISK, LINK",
author = "Rubin, {Katrine Hass} and Soren Moller and Anup Choudhury and Olesya Zorina and Sameer Kalsekar and Eriksen, {Erik F.} and Morten Andersen and Bo Abrahamsen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
journal = "Bone",
issn = "8756-3282",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries

AU - Rubin, Katrine Hass

AU - Moller, Soren

AU - Choudhury, Anup

AU - Zorina, Olesya

AU - Kalsekar, Sameer

AU - Eriksen, Erik F.

AU - Andersen, Morten

AU - Abrahamsen, Bo

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: This observational safety study used national registers to compare the real world cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid (ZA) against oral bisphosphonates (oBP) and untreated population controls.Methods: Propensity score matched cohort study in Sweden and Denmark.Results: Matched cohort 1 included 8739 ZA users and 25,577 oBP users while matched cohort 2 included 8731 ZA users and 25,924 untreated subjects.In comparison to oBP users, heart failure risk was higher in ZA users, with an adjusted HR (adj) (95%CI) of 1.17 (1.04;1.32) and a higher all-cause mortality (adj HR 1.24 (1.15; 1.34)), however, there was no increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. In the comparison to untreated subjects, ZA users showed a higher risk of atrial fibrillation, adj HR 1.18 (1.05;1.32), arrhythmias adj HR 1.18 (1.06;1.31), and heart failure, adj HR 1.38 (1.24;1.54). Cardiovascular mortality was lower in ZA users (adj HR 0.87 (0.77; 0.98)) and risk of adverse skeletal outcomes was significantly higher, reflecting more severe osteoporosis in these patients. There was no association of cardiovascular risk with increasing exposure time. Sensitivity analyses produced similar findings with no substantial changes in event rates.Conclusions: We noted an increased risk of heart failure, fractures and death among ZA users compared with oral BP. The risk of cardiovascular and skeletal outcomes was higher in ZA users than in matched population controls, but there was no increase in cardiovascular mortality in ZA users compared to oral BP or untreated controls. Despite propensity score matching, it is not possible to determine with certainty whether the increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes is consistent with a true drug effect or higher baseline risk in patients who begin ZA treatment.

AB - Background: This observational safety study used national registers to compare the real world cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid (ZA) against oral bisphosphonates (oBP) and untreated population controls.Methods: Propensity score matched cohort study in Sweden and Denmark.Results: Matched cohort 1 included 8739 ZA users and 25,577 oBP users while matched cohort 2 included 8731 ZA users and 25,924 untreated subjects.In comparison to oBP users, heart failure risk was higher in ZA users, with an adjusted HR (adj) (95%CI) of 1.17 (1.04;1.32) and a higher all-cause mortality (adj HR 1.24 (1.15; 1.34)), however, there was no increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. In the comparison to untreated subjects, ZA users showed a higher risk of atrial fibrillation, adj HR 1.18 (1.05;1.32), arrhythmias adj HR 1.18 (1.06;1.31), and heart failure, adj HR 1.38 (1.24;1.54). Cardiovascular mortality was lower in ZA users (adj HR 0.87 (0.77; 0.98)) and risk of adverse skeletal outcomes was significantly higher, reflecting more severe osteoporosis in these patients. There was no association of cardiovascular risk with increasing exposure time. Sensitivity analyses produced similar findings with no substantial changes in event rates.Conclusions: We noted an increased risk of heart failure, fractures and death among ZA users compared with oral BP. The risk of cardiovascular and skeletal outcomes was higher in ZA users than in matched population controls, but there was no increase in cardiovascular mortality in ZA users compared to oral BP or untreated controls. Despite propensity score matching, it is not possible to determine with certainty whether the increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes is consistent with a true drug effect or higher baseline risk in patients who begin ZA treatment.

KW - Propensity score

KW - Matched cohorts

KW - Observational cohort study

KW - Cardiovascular risk

KW - Skeletal risk

KW - Zoledronic acid

KW - BONE-MINERAL DENSITY

KW - HEART-FAILURE

KW - BISPHOSPHONATES

KW - OSTEONECROSIS

KW - POPULATION

KW - JAW

KW - CANCER

KW - WOMEN

KW - RISK

KW - LINK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296

DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32097760

VL - 134

JO - Bone

JF - Bone

SN - 8756-3282

M1 - 115296

ER -

ID: 246093088