Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system. / Wiesener, Cornelius; Olsen, Henrik Palmer.

I: Law, Innovation and Technology, Bind 13, Nr. 2, 14.09.2021, s. 398-421.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Wiesener, C & Olsen, HP 2021, 'Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system', Law, Innovation and Technology, bind 13, nr. 2, s. 398-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221

APA

Wiesener, C., & Olsen, H. P. (2021). Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(2), 398-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221

Vancouver

Wiesener C, Olsen HP. Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system. Law, Innovation and Technology. 2021 sep. 14;13(2):398-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221

Author

Wiesener, Cornelius ; Olsen, Henrik Palmer. / Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system. I: Law, Innovation and Technology. 2021 ; Bind 13, Nr. 2. s. 398-421.

Bibtex

@article{115a4d35d45340c183ce5c8d634b9a83,
title = "Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system",
abstract = "In this article, we examine the European framework of collecting and analysingflight passenger name record (PNR) data for the purpose of combating terrorism and serious crime. The focus is mainly on the EU PNR Directive of 2016, but we also consider the specific legislative framework in Germany and Denmark. In light of the recent review of the Directive, the article aims at exploring the policy-related, legal and technological challenges. In doing so, it goes beyond established data protection concerns. In particular, we debunk the popular claim that PNR analysis in and of itself entails the risk of discrimination of certain groups – a claim commonly levelled against algorithmic analysis. We also provide useful insights into the specific legal safeguards vis-{\`a}-vis automated profiling and decision-making through human review.",
author = "Cornelius Wiesener and Olsen, {Henrik Palmer}",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "398--421",
journal = "Law, Innovation and Technology",
issn = "1757-9961",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system

AU - Wiesener, Cornelius

AU - Olsen, Henrik Palmer

PY - 2021/9/14

Y1 - 2021/9/14

N2 - In this article, we examine the European framework of collecting and analysingflight passenger name record (PNR) data for the purpose of combating terrorism and serious crime. The focus is mainly on the EU PNR Directive of 2016, but we also consider the specific legislative framework in Germany and Denmark. In light of the recent review of the Directive, the article aims at exploring the policy-related, legal and technological challenges. In doing so, it goes beyond established data protection concerns. In particular, we debunk the popular claim that PNR analysis in and of itself entails the risk of discrimination of certain groups – a claim commonly levelled against algorithmic analysis. We also provide useful insights into the specific legal safeguards vis-à-vis automated profiling and decision-making through human review.

AB - In this article, we examine the European framework of collecting and analysingflight passenger name record (PNR) data for the purpose of combating terrorism and serious crime. The focus is mainly on the EU PNR Directive of 2016, but we also consider the specific legislative framework in Germany and Denmark. In light of the recent review of the Directive, the article aims at exploring the policy-related, legal and technological challenges. In doing so, it goes beyond established data protection concerns. In particular, we debunk the popular claim that PNR analysis in and of itself entails the risk of discrimination of certain groups – a claim commonly levelled against algorithmic analysis. We also provide useful insights into the specific legal safeguards vis-à-vis automated profiling and decision-making through human review.

U2 - 10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221

DO - 10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 398

EP - 421

JO - Law, Innovation and Technology

JF - Law, Innovation and Technology

SN - 1757-9961

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 286276176