Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. / Benetti, Ana Raquel; Michou, Stavroula; Larsen, Liselotte; Peutzfeldt, Anne; Pallesen, Ulla; van Dijken, Jan Willem Viator.

I: Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, Bind 6, Nr. 1, 2019, s. 90-98.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Benetti, AR, Michou, S, Larsen, L, Peutzfeldt, A, Pallesen, U & van Dijken, JWV 2019, 'Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material', Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, bind 6, nr. 1, s. 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202

APA

Benetti, A. R., Michou, S., Larsen, L., Peutzfeldt, A., Pallesen, U., & van Dijken, J. W. V. (2019). Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 6(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202

Vancouver

Benetti AR, Michou S, Larsen L, Peutzfeldt A, Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. Biomaterial investigations in dentistry. 2019;6(1):90-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202

Author

Benetti, Ana Raquel ; Michou, Stavroula ; Larsen, Liselotte ; Peutzfeldt, Anne ; Pallesen, Ulla ; van Dijken, Jan Willem Viator. / Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. I: Biomaterial investigations in dentistry. 2019 ; Bind 6, Nr. 1. s. 90-98.

Bibtex

@article{9730f1ca0736496686fe56af483ce287,
title = "Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material",
abstract = "Objectives: Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative) to human teeth were compared with those of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) and a control resin composite (Ceram X Mono). Material and Methods: Shear bond strength and marginal adaptation to enamel and dentine were assessed after no pretreatment of the hard tissues or after etching with phosphoric acid (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative and Ceram X Mono) or polyacrylic acid (Fuji II LC). For ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, the effect of applying a self-etch adhesive (Xeno Select, Dentsply Sirona) was also investigated. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (α = 0.05). Results: Bond strength and marginal adaptation in enamel and dentine were significantly different among the investigated materials (p<.05). Due to loss of restorations, it was not possible to measure bond strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative if no pretreatment was performed or if dentine was etched; however, use of the self-etch adhesive resulted in similar bond strength as Ceram X Mono. Etching improved adhesion of Fuji II LC to enamel and dentine. Regarding marginal adaptation, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the highest wall-to-wall contraction to enamel in all pretreatment groups and the overall highest wall-to-wall contraction to dentine after etching. Due to loss of restorations, no marginal assessment was possible on cavities with margins in dentine when no pretreatment was used. The use of a self-etch adhesive with ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative resulted in similar adaptation to dentine compared to the other materials. Conclusion: The self-adhesive property of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative is nonexistent.",
author = "Benetti, {Ana Raquel} and Stavroula Michou and Liselotte Larsen and Anne Peutzfeldt and Ulla Pallesen and {van Dijken}, {Jan Willem Viator}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "90--98",
journal = "Biomaterial investigations in dentistry",
issn = "2641-5275",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material

AU - Benetti, Ana Raquel

AU - Michou, Stavroula

AU - Larsen, Liselotte

AU - Peutzfeldt, Anne

AU - Pallesen, Ulla

AU - van Dijken, Jan Willem Viator

N1 - © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objectives: Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative) to human teeth were compared with those of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) and a control resin composite (Ceram X Mono). Material and Methods: Shear bond strength and marginal adaptation to enamel and dentine were assessed after no pretreatment of the hard tissues or after etching with phosphoric acid (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative and Ceram X Mono) or polyacrylic acid (Fuji II LC). For ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, the effect of applying a self-etch adhesive (Xeno Select, Dentsply Sirona) was also investigated. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (α = 0.05). Results: Bond strength and marginal adaptation in enamel and dentine were significantly different among the investigated materials (p<.05). Due to loss of restorations, it was not possible to measure bond strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative if no pretreatment was performed or if dentine was etched; however, use of the self-etch adhesive resulted in similar bond strength as Ceram X Mono. Etching improved adhesion of Fuji II LC to enamel and dentine. Regarding marginal adaptation, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the highest wall-to-wall contraction to enamel in all pretreatment groups and the overall highest wall-to-wall contraction to dentine after etching. Due to loss of restorations, no marginal assessment was possible on cavities with margins in dentine when no pretreatment was used. The use of a self-etch adhesive with ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative resulted in similar adaptation to dentine compared to the other materials. Conclusion: The self-adhesive property of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative is nonexistent.

AB - Objectives: Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative) to human teeth were compared with those of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) and a control resin composite (Ceram X Mono). Material and Methods: Shear bond strength and marginal adaptation to enamel and dentine were assessed after no pretreatment of the hard tissues or after etching with phosphoric acid (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative and Ceram X Mono) or polyacrylic acid (Fuji II LC). For ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, the effect of applying a self-etch adhesive (Xeno Select, Dentsply Sirona) was also investigated. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (α = 0.05). Results: Bond strength and marginal adaptation in enamel and dentine were significantly different among the investigated materials (p<.05). Due to loss of restorations, it was not possible to measure bond strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative if no pretreatment was performed or if dentine was etched; however, use of the self-etch adhesive resulted in similar bond strength as Ceram X Mono. Etching improved adhesion of Fuji II LC to enamel and dentine. Regarding marginal adaptation, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the highest wall-to-wall contraction to enamel in all pretreatment groups and the overall highest wall-to-wall contraction to dentine after etching. Due to loss of restorations, no marginal assessment was possible on cavities with margins in dentine when no pretreatment was used. The use of a self-etch adhesive with ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative resulted in similar adaptation to dentine compared to the other materials. Conclusion: The self-adhesive property of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative is nonexistent.

U2 - 10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202

DO - 10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31998876

VL - 6

SP - 90

EP - 98

JO - Biomaterial investigations in dentistry

JF - Biomaterial investigations in dentistry

SN - 2641-5275

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 235542190