Z-Time: Making and feeling time in the chronobiological laboratory
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Z-Time : Making and feeling time in the chronobiological laboratory. / Hussey, Kristin D.
In: Time & Society, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Z-Time
T2 - Making and feeling time in the chronobiological laboratory
AU - Hussey, Kristin D.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This article explores how scientists make and feel time in the context of the chronobiological laboratory. Like other scholars who have tracked the temporal regimes of scientific knowledge making, I am interested in the kinds of times produced in and around experiments performed by the scientists who study circadian rhythms. During gruelling ‘time point’ experiments, chronobiologists attempt to mould their own rhythmic, biological bodies to a scientific temporality that emphasises exactness and regularity to facilitate almost continuous data collection. Within this complex ‘timescape’, scientists tinker with time itself in order to navigate the multiple temporalities produced by their research. They deploy a scientific time convention known as ‘Z-Time’ or ‘zeitgeber time’ as a method of ‘time work’ that allows them to customise the temporal experience of their working lives and their experimental subjects, lab mice. I argue that a case study of the chronobiology lab questions the extent to which time can be ‘worked’ in the context of biological research. I explore what the tension between scientific and embodied times can tell us about the role of temporality in making ‘good science’ and the ‘emotional culture’ that time point experiments foster among chronobiologists.
AB - This article explores how scientists make and feel time in the context of the chronobiological laboratory. Like other scholars who have tracked the temporal regimes of scientific knowledge making, I am interested in the kinds of times produced in and around experiments performed by the scientists who study circadian rhythms. During gruelling ‘time point’ experiments, chronobiologists attempt to mould their own rhythmic, biological bodies to a scientific temporality that emphasises exactness and regularity to facilitate almost continuous data collection. Within this complex ‘timescape’, scientists tinker with time itself in order to navigate the multiple temporalities produced by their research. They deploy a scientific time convention known as ‘Z-Time’ or ‘zeitgeber time’ as a method of ‘time work’ that allows them to customise the temporal experience of their working lives and their experimental subjects, lab mice. I argue that a case study of the chronobiology lab questions the extent to which time can be ‘worked’ in the context of biological research. I explore what the tension between scientific and embodied times can tell us about the role of temporality in making ‘good science’ and the ‘emotional culture’ that time point experiments foster among chronobiologists.
U2 - 10.1177/0961463X231184083
DO - 10.1177/0961463X231184083
M3 - Journal article
JO - Time and Society
JF - Time and Society
SN - 0961-463X
ER -
ID: 358662892