What is Impact? Humanities PhD Supervisors Negotiating the Imperative of Impact in Danish Doctoral Education.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference abstract in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Standard
What is Impact? Humanities PhD Supervisors Negotiating the Imperative of Impact in Danish Doctoral Education. / Skov, Signe.
Society for Research into Higher Education. 2022.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference abstract in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - ABST
T1 - What is Impact? Humanities PhD Supervisors Negotiating the Imperative of Impact in Danish Doctoral Education.
AU - Skov, Signe
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Pavel Zgaga (2018) writes about how a growing instrumentalization of higher education has implications for the notion of mobility in risk of being pursued primarily for economic reasons, overlooking the meaning and purpose with mobility, i.e. why we should enhance mobility, not just how. The same tendency might also apply to another neoliberal imperative these years within doctoral education besides mobility (Balaban & Wright, 2018), that is impact. In Denmark researchers and doctoral education are met with an increased political expectation of impact, most often conceptualized in terms of returns on investments difficult for the humanities to account directly for. Drawing on interviews with humanities doctoral supervisors, this paper illustrates and articulates how dominant public discourses of impact are both transformed, resisted, and reproduced, locally, displaying the possibilities and barriers for challenging public discourses of impact as de-contextualized, timeless, and immediately transferable, outcomes, and with implications for doctoral supervision practices.
AB - Pavel Zgaga (2018) writes about how a growing instrumentalization of higher education has implications for the notion of mobility in risk of being pursued primarily for economic reasons, overlooking the meaning and purpose with mobility, i.e. why we should enhance mobility, not just how. The same tendency might also apply to another neoliberal imperative these years within doctoral education besides mobility (Balaban & Wright, 2018), that is impact. In Denmark researchers and doctoral education are met with an increased political expectation of impact, most often conceptualized in terms of returns on investments difficult for the humanities to account directly for. Drawing on interviews with humanities doctoral supervisors, this paper illustrates and articulates how dominant public discourses of impact are both transformed, resisted, and reproduced, locally, displaying the possibilities and barriers for challenging public discourses of impact as de-contextualized, timeless, and immediately transferable, outcomes, and with implications for doctoral supervision practices.
M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings
BT - Society for Research into Higher Education
Y2 - 5 December 2022 through 9 December 2022
ER -
ID: 370803778