Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers : A multicenter study. / Zwan, Marissa D; Rinne, Juha O; Hasselbalch, Steen G; Nordberg, Agneta; Lleó, Alberto; Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa; Soininen, Hilkka; Law, Ian; Bahl, Justyna M. C.; Carter, Stephen F; Fortea, Juan; Blesa, Rafael; Teunissen, Charlotte E; Bouwman, Femke H; van Berckel, Bart N M; Visser, Pieter J.

In: Neurology, Vol. 86, No. 1, 05.01.2016, p. 50-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Zwan, MD, Rinne, JO, Hasselbalch, SG, Nordberg, A, Lleó, A, Herukka, S-K, Soininen, H, Law, I, Bahl, JMC, Carter, SF, Fortea, J, Blesa, R, Teunissen, CE, Bouwman, FH, van Berckel, BNM & Visser, PJ 2016, 'Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study', Neurology, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081

APA

Zwan, M. D., Rinne, J. O., Hasselbalch, S. G., Nordberg, A., Lleó, A., Herukka, S-K., Soininen, H., Law, I., Bahl, J. M. C., Carter, S. F., Fortea, J., Blesa, R., Teunissen, C. E., Bouwman, F. H., van Berckel, B. N. M., & Visser, P. J. (2016). Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study. Neurology, 86(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081

Vancouver

Zwan MD, Rinne JO, Hasselbalch SG, Nordberg A, Lleó A, Herukka S-K et al. Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study. Neurology. 2016 Jan 5;86(1):50-58. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081

Author

Zwan, Marissa D ; Rinne, Juha O ; Hasselbalch, Steen G ; Nordberg, Agneta ; Lleó, Alberto ; Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa ; Soininen, Hilkka ; Law, Ian ; Bahl, Justyna M. C. ; Carter, Stephen F ; Fortea, Juan ; Blesa, Rafael ; Teunissen, Charlotte E ; Bouwman, Femke H ; van Berckel, Bart N M ; Visser, Pieter J. / Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers : A multicenter study. In: Neurology. 2016 ; Vol. 86, No. 1. pp. 50-58.

Bibtex

@article{22df0b8062854e37b967b56bf618a3fa,
title = "Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice.METHODS: We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images.RESULTS: Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels.CONCLUSIONS: Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET.CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.",
keywords = "Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Biomarkers, Cohort Studies, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Peptide Fragments, Plaque, Amyloid, Positron-Emission Tomography, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Zwan, {Marissa D} and Rinne, {Juha O} and Hasselbalch, {Steen G} and Agneta Nordberg and Alberto Lle{\'o} and Sanna-Kaisa Herukka and Hilkka Soininen and Ian Law and Bahl, {Justyna M. C.} and Carter, {Stephen F} and Juan Fortea and Rafael Blesa and Teunissen, {Charlotte E} and Bouwman, {Femke H} and {van Berckel}, {Bart N M} and Visser, {Pieter J}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 American Academy of Neurology.",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "50--58",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers

T2 - A multicenter study

AU - Zwan, Marissa D

AU - Rinne, Juha O

AU - Hasselbalch, Steen G

AU - Nordberg, Agneta

AU - Lleó, Alberto

AU - Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa

AU - Soininen, Hilkka

AU - Law, Ian

AU - Bahl, Justyna M. C.

AU - Carter, Stephen F

AU - Fortea, Juan

AU - Blesa, Rafael

AU - Teunissen, Charlotte E

AU - Bouwman, Femke H

AU - van Berckel, Bart N M

AU - Visser, Pieter J

N1 - © 2015 American Academy of Neurology.

PY - 2016/1/5

Y1 - 2016/1/5

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice.METHODS: We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images.RESULTS: Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels.CONCLUSIONS: Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET.CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice.METHODS: We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images.RESULTS: Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels.CONCLUSIONS: Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET.CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.

KW - Aged

KW - Alzheimer Disease

KW - Amyloid beta-Peptides

KW - Biomarkers

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Dementia

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Mild Cognitive Impairment

KW - Peptide Fragments

KW - Plaque, Amyloid

KW - Positron-Emission Tomography

KW - Journal Article

KW - Multicenter Study

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26468410

VL - 86

SP - 50

EP - 58

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 164451454