Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: agential realism and poststructural analysess

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity : agential realism and poststructural analysess. / Højgaard, Lis; Søndergaard, Dorte Marie.

In: Theory & Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 338-354.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Højgaard, L & Søndergaard, DM 2011, 'Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: agential realism and poststructural analysess', Theory & Psychology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 338-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309359965

APA

Højgaard, L., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: agential realism and poststructural analysess. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 338-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309359965

Vancouver

Højgaard L, Søndergaard DM. Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: agential realism and poststructural analysess. Theory & Psychology. 2011 Jun;21(3):338-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309359965

Author

Højgaard, Lis ; Søndergaard, Dorte Marie. / Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity : agential realism and poststructural analysess. In: Theory & Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 338-354.

Bibtex

@article{a8a2a1f23f554eaa8a5bc7b1b5737305,
title = "Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: agential realism and poststructural analysess",
abstract = "This article seeks to address the theoretical foundations of subjectivity as co-constituted by discursive and material/technological forces. Our ambition is to develop a conceptual framework that draws from Science and Technology Studies and related “new materialist” frameworks and poststructuralist analyses in order to develop analytics that embrace the complexities we face in our empirical work. We discuss the potentialities and weaknesses of the two theoretical frameworks at a conceptual level as well as through an empirical case on peer bullying in schools. The discussion leads us to a redefinition of the concept of subjectivity that emphasizes the multiplicity of enacting forces including human as well as non-human, material/technological actors; and that underlines the importance of a conceptualization of all actors as simultaneously enacting and enacted forces. ",
author = "Lis H{\o}jgaard and S{\o}ndergaard, {Dorte Marie}",
year = "2011",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/0959354309359965",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "338--354",
journal = "Theory & Psychology",
issn = "0959-3543",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity

T2 - agential realism and poststructural analysess

AU - Højgaard, Lis

AU - Søndergaard, Dorte Marie

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - This article seeks to address the theoretical foundations of subjectivity as co-constituted by discursive and material/technological forces. Our ambition is to develop a conceptual framework that draws from Science and Technology Studies and related “new materialist” frameworks and poststructuralist analyses in order to develop analytics that embrace the complexities we face in our empirical work. We discuss the potentialities and weaknesses of the two theoretical frameworks at a conceptual level as well as through an empirical case on peer bullying in schools. The discussion leads us to a redefinition of the concept of subjectivity that emphasizes the multiplicity of enacting forces including human as well as non-human, material/technological actors; and that underlines the importance of a conceptualization of all actors as simultaneously enacting and enacted forces.

AB - This article seeks to address the theoretical foundations of subjectivity as co-constituted by discursive and material/technological forces. Our ambition is to develop a conceptual framework that draws from Science and Technology Studies and related “new materialist” frameworks and poststructuralist analyses in order to develop analytics that embrace the complexities we face in our empirical work. We discuss the potentialities and weaknesses of the two theoretical frameworks at a conceptual level as well as through an empirical case on peer bullying in schools. The discussion leads us to a redefinition of the concept of subjectivity that emphasizes the multiplicity of enacting forces including human as well as non-human, material/technological actors; and that underlines the importance of a conceptualization of all actors as simultaneously enacting and enacted forces.

U2 - 10.1177/0959354309359965

DO - 10.1177/0959354309359965

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 338

EP - 354

JO - Theory & Psychology

JF - Theory & Psychology

SN - 0959-3543

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 33462969