The sound of silence: Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The sound of silence : Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience. / Mathiesen, Signe Lund; Hopia, Anu; Ojansivu, Pauliina; Byrne, Derek V.; Wang, Qian Janice.

In: Appetite, Vol. 174, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Mathiesen, SL, Hopia, A, Ojansivu, P, Byrne, DV & Wang, QJ 2022, 'The sound of silence: Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience', Appetite, vol. 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106011

APA

Mathiesen, S. L., Hopia, A., Ojansivu, P., Byrne, D. V., & Wang, Q. J. (2022). The sound of silence: Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience. Appetite, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106011

Vancouver

Mathiesen SL, Hopia A, Ojansivu P, Byrne DV, Wang QJ. The sound of silence: Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience. Appetite. 2022;174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106011

Author

Mathiesen, Signe Lund ; Hopia, Anu ; Ojansivu, Pauliina ; Byrne, Derek V. ; Wang, Qian Janice. / The sound of silence : Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience. In: Appetite. 2022 ; Vol. 174.

Bibtex

@article{9317ca79ec1a4f66802d406ce7aafb4c,
title = "The sound of silence: Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience",
abstract = "The interplay between external auditory cues in the eating environment and cognitive processes, such as distraction, may influence food intake, but how and the degree to which they do is unclear. We report an experiment designed to investigate the effects of different sonic atmospheres on meal duration, food intake and evaluations, and responses to the sonic eating environment. In a quasi-naturalistic cafeteria setting, participants (N = 248) were eating a lunch meal whilst being in one of four conditions: slow music, fast music, cafeteria noise, and silence. The results revealed that participants eating their lunch while exposed to some kind of background sound spent more time on their meal than those eating in silence. In terms of music tempo, slow music prolonged meal duration compared to fast music, but did not lead to increased intake. The appropriateness and liking of the sonic atmosphere were positively correlated with the overall pleasantness of the eating experience and liking of the food. The findings provide support for existing evidence documenting the importance of ambient sound in relation to food experiences and provide further insights into how individuals perceive and respond to sonic meal environments. Results are discussed in terms of recommendations for future design of eating environments in different contexts.",
author = "Mathiesen, {Signe Lund} and Anu Hopia and Pauliina Ojansivu and Byrne, {Derek V.} and Wang, {Qian Janice}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2022.106011",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sound of silence

T2 - Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience

AU - Mathiesen, Signe Lund

AU - Hopia, Anu

AU - Ojansivu, Pauliina

AU - Byrne, Derek V.

AU - Wang, Qian Janice

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The interplay between external auditory cues in the eating environment and cognitive processes, such as distraction, may influence food intake, but how and the degree to which they do is unclear. We report an experiment designed to investigate the effects of different sonic atmospheres on meal duration, food intake and evaluations, and responses to the sonic eating environment. In a quasi-naturalistic cafeteria setting, participants (N = 248) were eating a lunch meal whilst being in one of four conditions: slow music, fast music, cafeteria noise, and silence. The results revealed that participants eating their lunch while exposed to some kind of background sound spent more time on their meal than those eating in silence. In terms of music tempo, slow music prolonged meal duration compared to fast music, but did not lead to increased intake. The appropriateness and liking of the sonic atmosphere were positively correlated with the overall pleasantness of the eating experience and liking of the food. The findings provide support for existing evidence documenting the importance of ambient sound in relation to food experiences and provide further insights into how individuals perceive and respond to sonic meal environments. Results are discussed in terms of recommendations for future design of eating environments in different contexts.

AB - The interplay between external auditory cues in the eating environment and cognitive processes, such as distraction, may influence food intake, but how and the degree to which they do is unclear. We report an experiment designed to investigate the effects of different sonic atmospheres on meal duration, food intake and evaluations, and responses to the sonic eating environment. In a quasi-naturalistic cafeteria setting, participants (N = 248) were eating a lunch meal whilst being in one of four conditions: slow music, fast music, cafeteria noise, and silence. The results revealed that participants eating their lunch while exposed to some kind of background sound spent more time on their meal than those eating in silence. In terms of music tempo, slow music prolonged meal duration compared to fast music, but did not lead to increased intake. The appropriateness and liking of the sonic atmosphere were positively correlated with the overall pleasantness of the eating experience and liking of the food. The findings provide support for existing evidence documenting the importance of ambient sound in relation to food experiences and provide further insights into how individuals perceive and respond to sonic meal environments. Results are discussed in terms of recommendations for future design of eating environments in different contexts.

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106011

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106011

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35337885

VL - 174

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -

ID: 344448313