Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences. / Persons, Nicholas W.; Hosner, Peter A.; Meiklejohn, Kelly A.; Braun, Edward L.; Kimball, Rebecca T.

In: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 98, 2016, p. 123-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Persons, NW, Hosner, PA, Meiklejohn, KA, Braun, EL & Kimball, RT 2016, 'Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences', Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 98, pp. 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.003

APA

Persons, N. W., Hosner, P. A., Meiklejohn, K. A., Braun, E. L., & Kimball, R. T. (2016). Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 98, 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.003

Vancouver

Persons NW, Hosner PA, Meiklejohn KA, Braun EL, Kimball RT. Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2016;98:123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.003

Author

Persons, Nicholas W. ; Hosner, Peter A. ; Meiklejohn, Kelly A. ; Braun, Edward L. ; Kimball, Rebecca T. / Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences. In: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2016 ; Vol. 98. pp. 123-132.

Bibtex

@article{e4730242b8ef4b42af73ac9b73559c14,
title = "Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences",
abstract = "The Holarctic phasianid clade of the grouse and ptarmigan has received substantial attention in areas such as evolution of mating systems, display behavior, and population ecology related to their conservation and management as wild game species. There are multiple molecular phylogenetic studies that focus on grouse and ptarmigan. In spite of this, there is little consensus regarding historical relationships, particularly among genera, which has led to unstable and partial taxonomic revisions. We estimated the phylogeny of all currently recognized species using a combination of novel data from seven nuclear loci (largely intron sequences) and published data from one additional autosomal locus, two W-linked loci, and four mitochondrial regions. To explore relationships among genera and assess paraphyly of one genus more rigorously, we then added over 3000 ultra-conserved element (UCE) loci (over 1.7 million bp) gathered using Illumina sequencing. The UCE topology agreed with that of the combined nuclear intron and previously published sequence data with 100% bootstrap support for all relationships. These data strongly support previous studies separating Bonasa from Tetrastes and Dendragapus from Falcipennis. However, the placement of Lagopus differed from previous studies, and we found no support for Falcipennis monophyly. Biogeographic analysis suggests that the ancestors of grouse and ptarmigan were distributed in the New World and subsequently underwent at least four dispersal events between the Old and New Worlds. Divergence time estimates from maternally-inherited and autosomal markers show stark differences across this clade, with divergence time estimates from maternally-inherited markers being nearly half that of the autosomal markers at some nodes, and nearly twice that at other nodes.",
keywords = "Biogeography, Cyto-nuclear discordance, Species tree, Ultra-conserved elements",
author = "Persons, {Nicholas W.} and Hosner, {Peter A.} and Meiklejohn, {Kelly A.} and Braun, {Edward L.} and Kimball, {Rebecca T.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "123--132",
journal = "Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution",
issn = "1055-7903",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences

AU - Persons, Nicholas W.

AU - Hosner, Peter A.

AU - Meiklejohn, Kelly A.

AU - Braun, Edward L.

AU - Kimball, Rebecca T.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The Holarctic phasianid clade of the grouse and ptarmigan has received substantial attention in areas such as evolution of mating systems, display behavior, and population ecology related to their conservation and management as wild game species. There are multiple molecular phylogenetic studies that focus on grouse and ptarmigan. In spite of this, there is little consensus regarding historical relationships, particularly among genera, which has led to unstable and partial taxonomic revisions. We estimated the phylogeny of all currently recognized species using a combination of novel data from seven nuclear loci (largely intron sequences) and published data from one additional autosomal locus, two W-linked loci, and four mitochondrial regions. To explore relationships among genera and assess paraphyly of one genus more rigorously, we then added over 3000 ultra-conserved element (UCE) loci (over 1.7 million bp) gathered using Illumina sequencing. The UCE topology agreed with that of the combined nuclear intron and previously published sequence data with 100% bootstrap support for all relationships. These data strongly support previous studies separating Bonasa from Tetrastes and Dendragapus from Falcipennis. However, the placement of Lagopus differed from previous studies, and we found no support for Falcipennis monophyly. Biogeographic analysis suggests that the ancestors of grouse and ptarmigan were distributed in the New World and subsequently underwent at least four dispersal events between the Old and New Worlds. Divergence time estimates from maternally-inherited and autosomal markers show stark differences across this clade, with divergence time estimates from maternally-inherited markers being nearly half that of the autosomal markers at some nodes, and nearly twice that at other nodes.

AB - The Holarctic phasianid clade of the grouse and ptarmigan has received substantial attention in areas such as evolution of mating systems, display behavior, and population ecology related to their conservation and management as wild game species. There are multiple molecular phylogenetic studies that focus on grouse and ptarmigan. In spite of this, there is little consensus regarding historical relationships, particularly among genera, which has led to unstable and partial taxonomic revisions. We estimated the phylogeny of all currently recognized species using a combination of novel data from seven nuclear loci (largely intron sequences) and published data from one additional autosomal locus, two W-linked loci, and four mitochondrial regions. To explore relationships among genera and assess paraphyly of one genus more rigorously, we then added over 3000 ultra-conserved element (UCE) loci (over 1.7 million bp) gathered using Illumina sequencing. The UCE topology agreed with that of the combined nuclear intron and previously published sequence data with 100% bootstrap support for all relationships. These data strongly support previous studies separating Bonasa from Tetrastes and Dendragapus from Falcipennis. However, the placement of Lagopus differed from previous studies, and we found no support for Falcipennis monophyly. Biogeographic analysis suggests that the ancestors of grouse and ptarmigan were distributed in the New World and subsequently underwent at least four dispersal events between the Old and New Worlds. Divergence time estimates from maternally-inherited and autosomal markers show stark differences across this clade, with divergence time estimates from maternally-inherited markers being nearly half that of the autosomal markers at some nodes, and nearly twice that at other nodes.

KW - Biogeography

KW - Cyto-nuclear discordance

KW - Species tree

KW - Ultra-conserved elements

U2 - 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.003

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26879712

AN - SCOPUS:84958741907

VL - 98

SP - 123

EP - 132

JO - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

JF - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

SN - 1055-7903

ER -

ID: 217562035