Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair : results from a randomized clinical trial. / Andresen, K; Burcharth, J.; Fonnes, S; Hupfeld, L; Rothman, J P; Deigaard, S; Winther, D; Errebo, M B; Therkildsen, R; Hauge, D; Sørensen, F. S.; Bjerg, J; Rosenberg, J.

In: Hernia, Vol. 19, No. 6, 12.2015, p. 871-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Andresen, K, Burcharth, J, Fonnes, S, Hupfeld, L, Rothman, JP, Deigaard, S, Winther, D, Errebo, MB, Therkildsen, R, Hauge, D, Sørensen, FS, Bjerg, J & Rosenberg, J 2015, 'Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial', Hernia, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 871-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8

APA

Andresen, K., Burcharth, J., Fonnes, S., Hupfeld, L., Rothman, J. P., Deigaard, S., Winther, D., Errebo, M. B., Therkildsen, R., Hauge, D., Sørensen, F. S., Bjerg, J., & Rosenberg, J. (2015). Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial. Hernia, 19(6), 871-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8

Vancouver

Andresen K, Burcharth J, Fonnes S, Hupfeld L, Rothman JP, Deigaard S et al. Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial. Hernia. 2015 Dec;19(6):871-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8

Author

Andresen, K ; Burcharth, J. ; Fonnes, S ; Hupfeld, L ; Rothman, J P ; Deigaard, S ; Winther, D ; Errebo, M B ; Therkildsen, R ; Hauge, D ; Sørensen, F. S. ; Bjerg, J ; Rosenberg, J. / Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair : results from a randomized clinical trial. In: Hernia. 2015 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 871-7.

Bibtex

@article{d8ccada5298b4c8093a3c6ba240594cb,
title = "Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Because of the high number of patients with chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair, a new, simple and safe method of repair is needed. Onstep is a new type of inguinal hernia repair that might be able to reduce postoperative acute and chronic pain. The aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences in early postoperative pain during the first 10 days between the Onstep and the Lichtenstein technique.METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in five surgical departments in Denmark, from April 2013 to June 2014. Eligible participants for this study were male patients, >18 years, with a primary inguinal hernia. Experimental treatment in this study was the Onstep technique, which was compared with the Lichtenstein repair. Primary outcome was postoperative pain during the first 10 days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, period for return to normal daily activities (days), and recurrence. Randomization was done in blocks and stratified on centers. Participants and study personnel handling questionnaires and analysis were blinded to the allocation.RESULTS: In total, 290 participants were randomized. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding early postoperative pain or minor postoperative complications. Four patients had a recurrence within the first 10 days of follow-up, one patient in the Lichtenstein group and three patients in the Onstep group, p = 0.30.CONCLUSION: The Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair was safe and had comparable results to the Lichtenstein repair regarding short-term pain and postoperative complications.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01753219).",
author = "K Andresen and J. Burcharth and S Fonnes and L Hupfeld and Rothman, {J P} and S Deigaard and D Winther and Errebo, {M B} and R Therkildsen and D Hauge and S{\o}rensen, {F. S.} and J Bjerg and J Rosenberg",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "871--7",
journal = "Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery",
issn = "1265-4906",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag France",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair

T2 - results from a randomized clinical trial

AU - Andresen, K

AU - Burcharth, J.

AU - Fonnes, S

AU - Hupfeld, L

AU - Rothman, J P

AU - Deigaard, S

AU - Winther, D

AU - Errebo, M B

AU - Therkildsen, R

AU - Hauge, D

AU - Sørensen, F. S.

AU - Bjerg, J

AU - Rosenberg, J

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - PURPOSE: Because of the high number of patients with chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair, a new, simple and safe method of repair is needed. Onstep is a new type of inguinal hernia repair that might be able to reduce postoperative acute and chronic pain. The aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences in early postoperative pain during the first 10 days between the Onstep and the Lichtenstein technique.METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in five surgical departments in Denmark, from April 2013 to June 2014. Eligible participants for this study were male patients, >18 years, with a primary inguinal hernia. Experimental treatment in this study was the Onstep technique, which was compared with the Lichtenstein repair. Primary outcome was postoperative pain during the first 10 days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, period for return to normal daily activities (days), and recurrence. Randomization was done in blocks and stratified on centers. Participants and study personnel handling questionnaires and analysis were blinded to the allocation.RESULTS: In total, 290 participants were randomized. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding early postoperative pain or minor postoperative complications. Four patients had a recurrence within the first 10 days of follow-up, one patient in the Lichtenstein group and three patients in the Onstep group, p = 0.30.CONCLUSION: The Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair was safe and had comparable results to the Lichtenstein repair regarding short-term pain and postoperative complications.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01753219).

AB - PURPOSE: Because of the high number of patients with chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair, a new, simple and safe method of repair is needed. Onstep is a new type of inguinal hernia repair that might be able to reduce postoperative acute and chronic pain. The aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences in early postoperative pain during the first 10 days between the Onstep and the Lichtenstein technique.METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in five surgical departments in Denmark, from April 2013 to June 2014. Eligible participants for this study were male patients, >18 years, with a primary inguinal hernia. Experimental treatment in this study was the Onstep technique, which was compared with the Lichtenstein repair. Primary outcome was postoperative pain during the first 10 days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, period for return to normal daily activities (days), and recurrence. Randomization was done in blocks and stratified on centers. Participants and study personnel handling questionnaires and analysis were blinded to the allocation.RESULTS: In total, 290 participants were randomized. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding early postoperative pain or minor postoperative complications. Four patients had a recurrence within the first 10 days of follow-up, one patient in the Lichtenstein group and three patients in the Onstep group, p = 0.30.CONCLUSION: The Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair was safe and had comparable results to the Lichtenstein repair regarding short-term pain and postoperative complications.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01753219).

U2 - 10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8

DO - 10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26445862

VL - 19

SP - 871

EP - 877

JO - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

JF - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

SN - 1265-4906

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 162754533