Scripting the DSM‐5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders assessment procedure: A clinically feasible multi‐informant multi‐method approach
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Published case studies on the DSM-5 (section III) Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) gen- erally utilized unstandardized assessment procedures or mono-method approaches. We present a case from clin- ical practice to illustrate a standardized, clinically feasible procedure for assessing personality pathology according to the full AMPD model, using a multi-method approach. We aim to present a procedure that can guide and inspire clinicians that are going to work with dimensional models as presented in DSM-5 and ICD-11. Specif- ically, we show how questionnaire and interview data from multiple sources (i.e. patient and family) can be combined. The clinical case also illustrates how Criterion A (i.e. functioning) and B (i.e. traits) are interrelated, suggesting that the joint assessment of both Criterion A and B is necessary for a comprehensive and clinically relevant case formulation. It also highlights how multi-method information can enhance diagnostic formulations. Finally, we show how the AMPD model can serve treatment planning and provide suggestions for how patient feedback might be delivered.
Original language | Danish |
---|---|
Journal | Personality and Mental Health |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 304-318 |
Number of pages | 15 |
ISSN | 1932-8621 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2020 |
ID: 365596307