Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger". / Vinther, Siri; Nielsen, Ole Haagen; Rosenberg, Jacob; Keiding, Niels; Schroeder, Torben V.

In: Danish Medical Bulletin (Online), Vol. 59, No. 8, A4479, 08.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Vinther, S, Nielsen, OH, Rosenberg, J, Keiding, N & Schroeder, TV 2012, 'Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"', Danish Medical Bulletin (Online), vol. 59, no. 8, A4479. <http://www.danmedj.dk/portal/page/portal/danmedj.dk/dmj_forside/PAST_ISSUE/2012/DMJ_2012_08/A4479>

APA

Vinther, S., Nielsen, O. H., Rosenberg, J., Keiding, N., & Schroeder, T. V. (2012). Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger". Danish Medical Bulletin (Online), 59(8), [A4479]. http://www.danmedj.dk/portal/page/portal/danmedj.dk/dmj_forside/PAST_ISSUE/2012/DMJ_2012_08/A4479

Vancouver

Vinther S, Nielsen OH, Rosenberg J, Keiding N, Schroeder TV. Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger". Danish Medical Bulletin (Online). 2012 Aug;59(8). A4479.

Author

Vinther, Siri ; Nielsen, Ole Haagen ; Rosenberg, Jacob ; Keiding, Niels ; Schroeder, Torben V. / Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger". In: Danish Medical Bulletin (Online). 2012 ; Vol. 59, No. 8.

Bibtex

@article{aecaf6799e464429900dfb70cc599f11,
title = "Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in {"}Ugeskrift for L{\ae}ger{"}",
abstract = "Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.",
author = "Siri Vinther and Nielsen, {Ole Haagen} and Jacob Rosenberg and Niels Keiding and Schroeder, {Torben V}",
year = "2012",
month = aug,
language = "English",
volume = "59",
journal = "Danish Medical Journal",
issn = "2245-1919",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

AU - Vinther, Siri

AU - Nielsen, Ole Haagen

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

AU - Keiding, Niels

AU - Schroeder, Torben V

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

AB - Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 59

JO - Danish Medical Journal

JF - Danish Medical Journal

SN - 2245-1919

IS - 8

M1 - A4479

ER -

ID: 48534891