Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer : cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety. / Westvik-Johari, Kjersti; Lawlor, Deborah A.; Romundstad, Liv Bente; Bergh, Christina; Wennerholm, Ulla Britt; Gissler, Mika; Henningsen, Anna Karina A.; Håberg, Siri E.; Tiitinen, Aila; Spangmose, Anne Lærke; Pinborg, Anja; Opdahl, Signe.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 119, No. 2, 2023, p. 265-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Westvik-Johari, K, Lawlor, DA, Romundstad, LB, Bergh, C, Wennerholm, UB, Gissler, M, Henningsen, AKA, Håberg, SE, Tiitinen, A, Spangmose, AL, Pinborg, A & Opdahl, S 2023, 'Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety', Fertility and Sterility, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020

APA

Westvik-Johari, K., Lawlor, D. A., Romundstad, L. B., Bergh, C., Wennerholm, U. B., Gissler, M., Henningsen, A. K. A., Håberg, S. E., Tiitinen, A., Spangmose, A. L., Pinborg, A., & Opdahl, S. (2023). Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety. Fertility and Sterility, 119(2), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020

Vancouver

Westvik-Johari K, Lawlor DA, Romundstad LB, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB, Gissler M et al. Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety. Fertility and Sterility. 2023;119(2):265-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020

Author

Westvik-Johari, Kjersti ; Lawlor, Deborah A. ; Romundstad, Liv Bente ; Bergh, Christina ; Wennerholm, Ulla Britt ; Gissler, Mika ; Henningsen, Anna Karina A. ; Håberg, Siri E. ; Tiitinen, Aila ; Spangmose, Anne Lærke ; Pinborg, Anja ; Opdahl, Signe. / Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer : cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2023 ; Vol. 119, No. 2. pp. 265-276.

Bibtex

@article{1b810d4308164b5e88be9ddf517b7753,
title = "Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate whether risks of stillbirth and neonatal death differ after fresh embryo transfers (fresh-ETs) and frozen embryo transfers (frozen-ETs) compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance. Design: A population-based cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Data linkage between the nationwide Medical Birth Registries in Denmark (1994–2014), Norway and Sweden (1988–2015), and national quality registries and databases on assisted reproductive technology identified a total of 4,590,853 singletons, including 78,642 conceived by fresh-ET and 18,084 by frozen-ET. Intervention(s): None Main Outcome Measure(s): Stillbirth (fetal death before and during delivery) and neonatal death (live born with death 0–27 days postpartum). Result(s): Overall, 17,123 (0.37%) singletons were stillborn and 7,685 (0.17%) died neonatally. Compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, the odds of stillbirth were similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET, whereas the odds of neonatal death were high after fresh-ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–1.95) and frozen-ET (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.08–2.10). Preterm birth (<37 gestational weeks) was more common after fresh-ET (8.0%) and frozen-ET (6.6%) compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance (5.0%), and strongly associated with neonatal mortality across all conception methods. Within gestational age categories, risk of stillbirth and neonatal death was similar for all conception methods, except that singletons from fresh-ET had a higher risk of stillbirth during gestational week 22–27 (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51–2.26). Conclusion(s): Overall, the risk of stillbirth was similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, whereas neonatal mortality was high, possibly mediated by the high risk of preterm birth when compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance. Our results gave no clear support for choosing one treatment over the other.",
keywords = "ART, assisted conception, IVF, Neonatal death, stillbirth",
author = "Kjersti Westvik-Johari and Lawlor, {Deborah A.} and Romundstad, {Liv Bente} and Christina Bergh and Wennerholm, {Ulla Britt} and Mika Gissler and Henningsen, {Anna Karina A.} and H{\aa}berg, {Siri E.} and Aila Tiitinen and Spangmose, {Anne L{\ae}rke} and Anja Pinborg and Signe Opdahl",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "265--276",
journal = "Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause",
issn = "1546-2501",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer

T2 - cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety

AU - Westvik-Johari, Kjersti

AU - Lawlor, Deborah A.

AU - Romundstad, Liv Bente

AU - Bergh, Christina

AU - Wennerholm, Ulla Britt

AU - Gissler, Mika

AU - Henningsen, Anna Karina A.

AU - Håberg, Siri E.

AU - Tiitinen, Aila

AU - Spangmose, Anne Lærke

AU - Pinborg, Anja

AU - Opdahl, Signe

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Objectives: To investigate whether risks of stillbirth and neonatal death differ after fresh embryo transfers (fresh-ETs) and frozen embryo transfers (frozen-ETs) compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance. Design: A population-based cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Data linkage between the nationwide Medical Birth Registries in Denmark (1994–2014), Norway and Sweden (1988–2015), and national quality registries and databases on assisted reproductive technology identified a total of 4,590,853 singletons, including 78,642 conceived by fresh-ET and 18,084 by frozen-ET. Intervention(s): None Main Outcome Measure(s): Stillbirth (fetal death before and during delivery) and neonatal death (live born with death 0–27 days postpartum). Result(s): Overall, 17,123 (0.37%) singletons were stillborn and 7,685 (0.17%) died neonatally. Compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, the odds of stillbirth were similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET, whereas the odds of neonatal death were high after fresh-ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–1.95) and frozen-ET (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.08–2.10). Preterm birth (<37 gestational weeks) was more common after fresh-ET (8.0%) and frozen-ET (6.6%) compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance (5.0%), and strongly associated with neonatal mortality across all conception methods. Within gestational age categories, risk of stillbirth and neonatal death was similar for all conception methods, except that singletons from fresh-ET had a higher risk of stillbirth during gestational week 22–27 (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51–2.26). Conclusion(s): Overall, the risk of stillbirth was similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, whereas neonatal mortality was high, possibly mediated by the high risk of preterm birth when compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance. Our results gave no clear support for choosing one treatment over the other.

AB - Objectives: To investigate whether risks of stillbirth and neonatal death differ after fresh embryo transfers (fresh-ETs) and frozen embryo transfers (frozen-ETs) compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance. Design: A population-based cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Data linkage between the nationwide Medical Birth Registries in Denmark (1994–2014), Norway and Sweden (1988–2015), and national quality registries and databases on assisted reproductive technology identified a total of 4,590,853 singletons, including 78,642 conceived by fresh-ET and 18,084 by frozen-ET. Intervention(s): None Main Outcome Measure(s): Stillbirth (fetal death before and during delivery) and neonatal death (live born with death 0–27 days postpartum). Result(s): Overall, 17,123 (0.37%) singletons were stillborn and 7,685 (0.17%) died neonatally. Compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, the odds of stillbirth were similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET, whereas the odds of neonatal death were high after fresh-ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–1.95) and frozen-ET (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.08–2.10). Preterm birth (<37 gestational weeks) was more common after fresh-ET (8.0%) and frozen-ET (6.6%) compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance (5.0%), and strongly associated with neonatal mortality across all conception methods. Within gestational age categories, risk of stillbirth and neonatal death was similar for all conception methods, except that singletons from fresh-ET had a higher risk of stillbirth during gestational week 22–27 (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51–2.26). Conclusion(s): Overall, the risk of stillbirth was similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, whereas neonatal mortality was high, possibly mediated by the high risk of preterm birth when compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance. Our results gave no clear support for choosing one treatment over the other.

KW - ART

KW - assisted conception

KW - IVF

KW - Neonatal death

KW - stillbirth

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36567207

AN - SCOPUS:85146982954

VL - 119

SP - 265

EP - 276

JO - Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause

JF - Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause

SN - 1546-2501

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 363019192