Reducing invasiveness, duration, and cost of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis by omitting intravenous contrast injection -- Does it change the assessment of inflammatory and destructive joint changes by the OMERACT RAMRIS?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Reducing invasiveness, duration, and cost of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis by omitting intravenous contrast injection -- Does it change the assessment of inflammatory and destructive joint changes by the OMERACT RAMRIS? / Østergaard, Mikkel; Conaghan, Philip G; O'Connor, Philip; Szkudlarek, Marcin; Klarlund, Mette; Emery, Paul; Peterfy, Charles; Genant, Harry; McQueen, Fiona M; Bird, Paul; Lassere, Marissa; Ejbjerg, Bo; Ostergaard, Mikkel; Conaghan, Philip G; O'Connor, Philip; Szkudlarek, Marcin; Klarlund, Mette; Emery, Paul; Peterfy, Charles; Genant, Harry; McQueen, Fiona M; Bird, Paul; Lassere, Marissa; Ejbjerg, Bo.
In: Journal of Rheumatology, Vol. 36, No. 8, 2009, p. 1806-10.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing invasiveness, duration, and cost of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis by omitting intravenous contrast injection -- Does it change the assessment of inflammatory and destructive joint changes by the OMERACT RAMRIS?
AU - Østergaard, Mikkel
AU - Conaghan, Philip G
AU - O'Connor, Philip
AU - Szkudlarek, Marcin
AU - Klarlund, Mette
AU - Emery, Paul
AU - Peterfy, Charles
AU - Genant, Harry
AU - McQueen, Fiona M
AU - Bird, Paul
AU - Lassere, Marissa
AU - Ejbjerg, Bo
AU - Ostergaard, Mikkel
AU - Conaghan, Philip G
AU - O'Connor, Philip
AU - Szkudlarek, Marcin
AU - Klarlund, Mette
AU - Emery, Paul
AU - Peterfy, Charles
AU - Genant, Harry
AU - McQueen, Fiona M
AU - Bird, Paul
AU - Lassere, Marissa
AU - Ejbjerg, Bo
N1 - Keywords: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Contrast Media; Cost Savings; Databases, Factual; Gadolinium; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Metacarpophalangeal Joint; Reference Standards; Reproducibility of Results; Wrist Joint
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides highly sensitive assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) joints, but intravenous (IV) Gd injection prolongs examination time and increases cost, invasiveness, and patient discomfort. We explored to what extent RA joint pathologies in wrists and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints can be reliably assessed by unenhanced MRI images compared with Gd-enhanced MRI as the reference method. METHODS: MRI data sets from 2 RA substudies were scored according to preliminary OMERACT RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS): Substudy A included 1.0 T/1.5 T MR images from 40 RA patients, which were scored twice by 2 experienced readers. Substudy B included 0.2 T dedicated extremity MRI (E-MRI) images from 55 patients, scored twice by one experienced reader. The first reading included only unenhanced images, whereas complete image sets were available for the second reading. RESULTS: Gd contrast injection appeared unimportant to MRI scores of bone erosions and bone edema in RA wrist and MCP joints. However, when post-Gd MRI was considered the standard reference, MRI without Gd provided only moderate to high agreement concerning assessment of synovitis, and omitting the post-Gd acquisitions increased the interreader variation on synovitis scores. Low-field (0.2 T) E-MRI in these exercises provided a lower sensitivity of unenhanced imaging for synovitis than MRI using higher-field strengths. CONCLUSION: Omitting IV contrast injection did not change scores of bone erosions and bone edema, but decreased the reliability of synovitis scores. However, this disadvantage may for some purposes be outweighed by the possibility to assess more joints and/or greater feasibility.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides highly sensitive assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) joints, but intravenous (IV) Gd injection prolongs examination time and increases cost, invasiveness, and patient discomfort. We explored to what extent RA joint pathologies in wrists and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints can be reliably assessed by unenhanced MRI images compared with Gd-enhanced MRI as the reference method. METHODS: MRI data sets from 2 RA substudies were scored according to preliminary OMERACT RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS): Substudy A included 1.0 T/1.5 T MR images from 40 RA patients, which were scored twice by 2 experienced readers. Substudy B included 0.2 T dedicated extremity MRI (E-MRI) images from 55 patients, scored twice by one experienced reader. The first reading included only unenhanced images, whereas complete image sets were available for the second reading. RESULTS: Gd contrast injection appeared unimportant to MRI scores of bone erosions and bone edema in RA wrist and MCP joints. However, when post-Gd MRI was considered the standard reference, MRI without Gd provided only moderate to high agreement concerning assessment of synovitis, and omitting the post-Gd acquisitions increased the interreader variation on synovitis scores. Low-field (0.2 T) E-MRI in these exercises provided a lower sensitivity of unenhanced imaging for synovitis than MRI using higher-field strengths. CONCLUSION: Omitting IV contrast injection did not change scores of bone erosions and bone edema, but decreased the reliability of synovitis scores. However, this disadvantage may for some purposes be outweighed by the possibility to assess more joints and/or greater feasibility.
U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.090350
DO - 10.3899/jrheum.090350
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19671817
VL - 36
SP - 1806
EP - 1810
JO - Journal of Rheumatology
JF - Journal of Rheumatology
SN - 0315-162X
IS - 8
ER -
ID: 20621243