Reasons for non-participation in cancer rehabilitation: a scoping literature review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
Reasons for non-participation in cancer rehabilitation : a scoping literature review. / Erlik, Mikala; Timm, Helle; Larsen, Anders Thyge Steen; Quist, Morten.
In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 32, No. 6, 346, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reasons for non-participation in cancer rehabilitation
T2 - a scoping literature review
AU - Erlik, Mikala
AU - Timm, Helle
AU - Larsen, Anders Thyge Steen
AU - Quist, Morten
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Rehabilitation plays an important role in addressing the many challenges of living with cancer, but a large proportion of people with cancer do not participate in available cancer rehabilitation. Hence, reasons for non-participation in cancer rehabilitation need to be explored. Objective: The present study undertakes a scoping review of research examining reasons for non-participation in cancer rehabilitation among people with cancer. Design: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL for articles published until July 2023. Included studies were hand searched for relevant references and citations. Eligibility criteria: Method: Studies with qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method design. Population: Studies targeting adults (> 18) living with cancer, not participating in rehabilitation. Program type: The review included all studies defining program as rehabilitation but excluded clinical trials. Outcome: Studies examining reasons for non-participation in available rehabilitation. Data extraction: The extracted data included author(s)/year of publication, aim, population, information, rehabilitation type and main reasons for non-participation. Results: A total of nine studies were included (n = 3 quantitative, n = 2 qualitative, n = 4 mixed methods). Reasons for non-participation included physical, psychosocial and practical aspects. The main reason across studies was ‘no need for public support’ related to receiving sufficient support from family and friends. All studies focused on individual reasons, and structural conditions were rarely present. Conclusion: Research within this field is sparse. Future research should explore how individual reasons for non-participation relate to structural conditions, especially among people in socially disadvantaged positions living with cancer.
AB - Background: Rehabilitation plays an important role in addressing the many challenges of living with cancer, but a large proportion of people with cancer do not participate in available cancer rehabilitation. Hence, reasons for non-participation in cancer rehabilitation need to be explored. Objective: The present study undertakes a scoping review of research examining reasons for non-participation in cancer rehabilitation among people with cancer. Design: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL for articles published until July 2023. Included studies were hand searched for relevant references and citations. Eligibility criteria: Method: Studies with qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method design. Population: Studies targeting adults (> 18) living with cancer, not participating in rehabilitation. Program type: The review included all studies defining program as rehabilitation but excluded clinical trials. Outcome: Studies examining reasons for non-participation in available rehabilitation. Data extraction: The extracted data included author(s)/year of publication, aim, population, information, rehabilitation type and main reasons for non-participation. Results: A total of nine studies were included (n = 3 quantitative, n = 2 qualitative, n = 4 mixed methods). Reasons for non-participation included physical, psychosocial and practical aspects. The main reason across studies was ‘no need for public support’ related to receiving sufficient support from family and friends. All studies focused on individual reasons, and structural conditions were rarely present. Conclusion: Research within this field is sparse. Future research should explore how individual reasons for non-participation relate to structural conditions, especially among people in socially disadvantaged positions living with cancer.
KW - Health inequities
KW - Patient acceptance of health care
KW - Patient participation
KW - Refusal to participate
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Social support
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-024-08553-9
DO - 10.1007/s00520-024-08553-9
M3 - Review
C2 - 38743121
AN - SCOPUS:85193206845
VL - 32
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
SN - 0941-4355
IS - 6
M1 - 346
ER -
ID: 392698696