Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review

Standard

Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science. / Faber Frandsen, Tove; Nicolaisen, Jeppe.

2008. Paper presented at ASIS&T 2008 Annual Meeting , Columbus, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Faber Frandsen, T & Nicolaisen, J 2008, 'Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science', Paper presented at ASIS&T 2008 Annual Meeting , Columbus, United States, 24/10/2008 - 29/10/2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2008.1450450226

APA

Faber Frandsen, T., & Nicolaisen, J. (2008). Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science. Paper presented at ASIS&T 2008 Annual Meeting , Columbus, United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2008.1450450226

Vancouver

Faber Frandsen T, Nicolaisen J. Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science. 2008. Paper presented at ASIS&T 2008 Annual Meeting , Columbus, United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2008.1450450226

Author

Faber Frandsen, Tove ; Nicolaisen, Jeppe. / Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science. Paper presented at ASIS&T 2008 Annual Meeting , Columbus, United States.10 p.

Bibtex

@conference{7c0b3e1484954ce6b6436ea97db040ac,
title = "Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science",
abstract = "The paper adds a category to the list of possible negative steering effects of bibliometric indicators with a category for changes in credit assignment. The results of a longitudinal study of credit assignment practices in the fields of economics and information science are presented. The practice of alphabetization of authorship is demonstrated to vary significantly between the two fields. A slight increase is demonstrated to have taken place in economics during the last 30 years (1978-2007). A substantial decrease is demonstrated to have taken place in information science during the same period. A possible explanation for the demonstrated difference could be that information scientists have been much more aware of the bibliometric consequences of being first author compared to their colleagues in comparable fields (e.g., economics). This and other possible reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators are presented and discussed.",
author = "{Faber Frandsen}, Tove and Jeppe Nicolaisen",
note = "Titel p{\aa} proceedings: Proceedings of the 71. ASIST Annual Meeting; null ; Conference date: 24-10-2008 Through 29-10-2008",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1002/meet.2008.1450450226",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators: Trends in the alphabetization of authorship in economics and information science

AU - Faber Frandsen, Tove

AU - Nicolaisen, Jeppe

N1 - Conference code: 71

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The paper adds a category to the list of possible negative steering effects of bibliometric indicators with a category for changes in credit assignment. The results of a longitudinal study of credit assignment practices in the fields of economics and information science are presented. The practice of alphabetization of authorship is demonstrated to vary significantly between the two fields. A slight increase is demonstrated to have taken place in economics during the last 30 years (1978-2007). A substantial decrease is demonstrated to have taken place in information science during the same period. A possible explanation for the demonstrated difference could be that information scientists have been much more aware of the bibliometric consequences of being first author compared to their colleagues in comparable fields (e.g., economics). This and other possible reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators are presented and discussed.

AB - The paper adds a category to the list of possible negative steering effects of bibliometric indicators with a category for changes in credit assignment. The results of a longitudinal study of credit assignment practices in the fields of economics and information science are presented. The practice of alphabetization of authorship is demonstrated to vary significantly between the two fields. A slight increase is demonstrated to have taken place in economics during the last 30 years (1978-2007). A substantial decrease is demonstrated to have taken place in information science during the same period. A possible explanation for the demonstrated difference could be that information scientists have been much more aware of the bibliometric consequences of being first author compared to their colleagues in comparable fields (e.g., economics). This and other possible reactive tendencies of bibliometric indicators are presented and discussed.

U2 - 10.1002/meet.2008.1450450226

DO - 10.1002/meet.2008.1450450226

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 24 October 2008 through 29 October 2008

ER -

ID: 47063211