Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes. / Paulsen, Aksel; Overgaard, Søren; Lauritsen, Jens Martin.

In: P L o S One, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2012, p. e35087.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Paulsen, A, Overgaard, S & Lauritsen, JM 2012, 'Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes', P L o S One, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. e35087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035087

APA

Paulsen, A., Overgaard, S., & Lauritsen, J. M. (2012). Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes. P L o S One, 7(4), e35087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035087

Vancouver

Paulsen A, Overgaard S, Lauritsen JM. Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes. P L o S One. 2012;7(4):e35087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035087

Author

Paulsen, Aksel ; Overgaard, Søren ; Lauritsen, Jens Martin. / Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes. In: P L o S One. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. e35087.

Bibtex

@article{1dc5a8ff1c5a44288fa6c0320b1278bd,
title = "Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes",
abstract = "The clinical and scientific usage of patient-reported outcome measures is increasing in the health services. Often paper forms are used. Manual double entry of data is defined as the definitive gold standard for transferring data to an electronic format, but the process is laborious. Automated forms processing may be an alternative, but further validation is warranted.",
author = "Aksel Paulsen and S{\o}ren Overgaard and Lauritsen, {Jens Martin}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0035087",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "e35087",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes

AU - Paulsen, Aksel

AU - Overgaard, Søren

AU - Lauritsen, Jens Martin

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The clinical and scientific usage of patient-reported outcome measures is increasing in the health services. Often paper forms are used. Manual double entry of data is defined as the definitive gold standard for transferring data to an electronic format, but the process is laborious. Automated forms processing may be an alternative, but further validation is warranted.

AB - The clinical and scientific usage of patient-reported outcome measures is increasing in the health services. Often paper forms are used. Manual double entry of data is defined as the definitive gold standard for transferring data to an electronic format, but the process is laborious. Automated forms processing may be an alternative, but further validation is warranted.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0035087

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0035087

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22493733

VL - 7

SP - e35087

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 252050730