Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis. / Hansen, Henrik; Torre, Andre; Kallemose, Thomas; Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli; Godtfredsen, Nina Skavlan.

In: Thorax, Vol. 78, No. 10, 2023, p. 1039-1042.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hansen, H, Torre, A, Kallemose, T, Ulrik, CS & Godtfredsen, NS 2023, 'Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis', Thorax, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2023-220065

APA

Hansen, H., Torre, A., Kallemose, T., Ulrik, C. S., & Godtfredsen, N. S. (2023). Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis. Thorax, 78(10), 1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2023-220065

Vancouver

Hansen H, Torre A, Kallemose T, Ulrik CS, Godtfredsen NS. Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis. Thorax. 2023;78(10):1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2023-220065

Author

Hansen, Henrik ; Torre, Andre ; Kallemose, Thomas ; Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli ; Godtfredsen, Nina Skavlan. / Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis. In: Thorax. 2023 ; Vol. 78, No. 10. pp. 1039-1042.

Bibtex

@article{9c591540daaf42a794b6148335f0063f,
title = "Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis",
abstract = "Home-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) has been proposed to be equivalent to supervised outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) but available randomised trials have failed to reach the minimal important changes (MIC). The purpose of this study was to analyse the proportion of MIC responders and non-responders on short-term (10 weeks from baseline) and long-term (62 weeks from baseline) in total and between groups in 134 patients with COPD randomised (1:1) to either home-based PTR or traditional hospital-based outpatient PR. Difference between PTR and PR on 6MWD response proportion could not be shown at 10 (OR=0.72, CI=0.34 to 1.51, p=0.381) or 62 weeks (OR=1.12, CI=0.40 to 3.14, p=0.834). While the evidence and knowledge of PTR accumulate, outpatient supervised PR for now remains the standard of care, with home-based PTR as a strong secondary option for those unable to attend out-patient programmes. ",
keywords = "Exercise, Pulmonary Rehabilitation",
author = "Henrik Hansen and Andre Torre and Thomas Kallemose and Ulrik, {Charlotte Suppli} and Godtfredsen, {Nina Skavlan}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1136/thorax-2023-220065",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "1039--1042",
journal = "Thorax",
issn = "0040-6376",
publisher = "B M J Group",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis

AU - Hansen, Henrik

AU - Torre, Andre

AU - Kallemose, Thomas

AU - Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli

AU - Godtfredsen, Nina Skavlan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Home-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) has been proposed to be equivalent to supervised outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) but available randomised trials have failed to reach the minimal important changes (MIC). The purpose of this study was to analyse the proportion of MIC responders and non-responders on short-term (10 weeks from baseline) and long-term (62 weeks from baseline) in total and between groups in 134 patients with COPD randomised (1:1) to either home-based PTR or traditional hospital-based outpatient PR. Difference between PTR and PR on 6MWD response proportion could not be shown at 10 (OR=0.72, CI=0.34 to 1.51, p=0.381) or 62 weeks (OR=1.12, CI=0.40 to 3.14, p=0.834). While the evidence and knowledge of PTR accumulate, outpatient supervised PR for now remains the standard of care, with home-based PTR as a strong secondary option for those unable to attend out-patient programmes.

AB - Home-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) has been proposed to be equivalent to supervised outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) but available randomised trials have failed to reach the minimal important changes (MIC). The purpose of this study was to analyse the proportion of MIC responders and non-responders on short-term (10 weeks from baseline) and long-term (62 weeks from baseline) in total and between groups in 134 patients with COPD randomised (1:1) to either home-based PTR or traditional hospital-based outpatient PR. Difference between PTR and PR on 6MWD response proportion could not be shown at 10 (OR=0.72, CI=0.34 to 1.51, p=0.381) or 62 weeks (OR=1.12, CI=0.40 to 3.14, p=0.834). While the evidence and knowledge of PTR accumulate, outpatient supervised PR for now remains the standard of care, with home-based PTR as a strong secondary option for those unable to attend out-patient programmes.

KW - Exercise

KW - Pulmonary Rehabilitation

U2 - 10.1136/thorax-2023-220065

DO - 10.1136/thorax-2023-220065

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37451863

AN - SCOPUS:85166411682

VL - 78

SP - 1039

EP - 1042

JO - Thorax

JF - Thorax

SN - 0040-6376

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 371560670