Pre-colonial centralisation, traditional indirect rule, and state capacity in Africa

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

What explains contemporary variation in state capacity across African states? Recent research has focused on the possible role played by colonial and pre-colonial institutions. This paper investigates the way in which colonial and pre-colonial institutions interacted to affect the public legitimacy and coercive capacity of African states on independence. A coherent configuration of historical institutions, pre-colonial centralisation combined with colonial indirect rule through traditionally legitimate rulers, contrasts with the incoherent and comparatively illegitimate configurations of pre-colonial decentralisation with traditional rule and pre-colonial centralisation with colonial non-traditional or direct rule. The paper tests the theoretical expectations in a historical instrumental-variables framework.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCommonwealth and Comparative Politics
Volume56
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)195-215
ISSN1466-2043
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • State-building, state capacity, colonialism, economic history, political development

ID: 210197791