Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy. / Achiam, M P; Løgager, V; Chabanova, E; Thomsen, H S; Rosenberg, J.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 73, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 143-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Achiam, MP, Løgager, V, Chabanova, E, Thomsen, HS & Rosenberg, J 2010, 'Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy', European Journal of Radiology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 143-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.003

APA

Achiam, M. P., Løgager, V., Chabanova, E., Thomsen, H. S., & Rosenberg, J. (2010). Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy. European Journal of Radiology, 73(1), 143-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.003

Vancouver

Achiam MP, Løgager V, Chabanova E, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J. Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy. European Journal of Radiology. 2010 Jan 1;73(1):143-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.003

Author

Achiam, M P ; Løgager, V ; Chabanova, E ; Thomsen, H S ; Rosenberg, J. / Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy. In: European Journal of Radiology. 2010 ; Vol. 73, No. 1. pp. 143-7.

Bibtex

@article{2eabceeeebba4aa8a882ed6646998742,
title = "Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy",
abstract = "Conventional colonoscopy (CC) is the gold standard for colonic examinations. However, patient acceptance is not high. Patient acceptance is influenced by several factors, notably anticipation and experience. This has led to the assumption that patient acceptance would be higher in non-invasive examinations such as MR/CT colonography (MRC/CTC) and perhaps even higher without bowel preparation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient acceptance of MRC with fecal tagging versus CC.",
author = "Achiam, {M P} and V L{\o}gager and E Chabanova and Thomsen, {H S} and J Rosenberg",
note = "Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "143--7",
journal = "European Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy

AU - Achiam, M P

AU - Løgager, V

AU - Chabanova, E

AU - Thomsen, H S

AU - Rosenberg, J

N1 - Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Conventional colonoscopy (CC) is the gold standard for colonic examinations. However, patient acceptance is not high. Patient acceptance is influenced by several factors, notably anticipation and experience. This has led to the assumption that patient acceptance would be higher in non-invasive examinations such as MR/CT colonography (MRC/CTC) and perhaps even higher without bowel preparation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient acceptance of MRC with fecal tagging versus CC.

AB - Conventional colonoscopy (CC) is the gold standard for colonic examinations. However, patient acceptance is not high. Patient acceptance is influenced by several factors, notably anticipation and experience. This has led to the assumption that patient acceptance would be higher in non-invasive examinations such as MR/CT colonography (MRC/CTC) and perhaps even higher without bowel preparation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient acceptance of MRC with fecal tagging versus CC.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.003

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 73

SP - 143

EP - 147

JO - European Journal of Radiology

JF - European Journal of Radiology

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 34144678